Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of the nozzle structure of the large-diameter slurry shield cutterhead on the scouring characteristics

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mud cake of the large-diameter slurry shield severely affects the tunneling efficiency and construction safety, the avoidance and elimination of which largely depends on the scouring characteristics of the nozzle. Based on the solid–liquid two-phase flow theory and dynamic mesh technology, this paper establishes a mud flow model of the nozzle on a slurry shield cutterhead and a cutterhead rotation model and builds a simulation model of the cutterhead nozzle scouring process with CFD. By verifying the simulation model with the self-developed 1 Mpa pressure-bearing scouring test bench, the paper conducts an analysis on how the convergence angle, outlet diameter, and length–diameter ratio of the 12 m large-diameter slurry shield cutterhead affect the scouring characteristics of the nozzle. The results show that when the convergence angle is 13°, the flow fields will be more uniformly distributed inside the nozzle, the average flow rate will be maximized, reaching 3.29 m/s, and the pressure loss will be minimized, thus leading to a relatively good scouring performance. With the assurance of both high flow speed and low pressure loss, the nozzle outlet diameter can be set between 30 and 60 mm for optimal flushing effect; at this point, the average mud flow rate is no less than 3 m/s, and the pressure loss is no more than 106 pa, which can help solve the caking problem to some extent. With the increase in length–diameter ratio, the loss of static pressure and total pressure witnessed a relatively high rise, as result of which a smaller long-diameter ratio will be more appropriate, also considering the mud flow rate reaches a maximum value of 3.24 m/s when the ratio is 3 and satisfying results could be achieved when the above ratio has the value of about 3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sirivachiraporn A, Phienwej N (2012) Ground movements in EPB shield tunnelling of Bangkok subway project and impacts on adjacent buildings. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 30:10–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu C, Zhang Z, Richard A (2014) Pile and pile group response to tunnelling using a large diameter slurry shield—case study in Shanghai. Comput Geotech 59:21–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zizka Z, Schoesser B, Thewes M (2018) Slurry shield tunneling: new methodology for simplified prediction of increased pore pressures resulting from slurry infiltration at the tunnel face under cyclic excavation processes. Int J Civ Eng 4:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Xu T, Bezuijen A (2018) Analytical methods in predicting excess pore water pressure in front of slurry shield in saturated sandy ground. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 73:203–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Oh J, Ziegler M (2014) Investigation on influence of tail void grouting on the surface settlements during shield tunneling using a stress-pore pressure coupled analysis. KSCE J Civ Eng 18(3):803–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lin C, Zhang Z, Wu S (2012) Case study of slurry shield driving parameters’ influences on ground surface settlements. China Civ Eng J 4:116–126

    Google Scholar 

  7. Feng H, Yu R (2019) Numerical analysis of influence of double-line tunnel shield tunneling on ground surface settlement. J Railw Eng Soc 36(3):78–83

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lu L, Sun J, Zhou G, Tan S, Liu H, Li G (2018) Research on the surface deformation prediction for curved shield construction in clay stratum. J Railw Eng Soc 35(5):99–105

    Google Scholar 

  9. Xia Y, Wang Y, Wu D (2017) Transport characteristics of shield slurry system. J Cent South Univ Sci Technol 48(11):2890–2897

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yang D, Xia Y, Wu D (2018) Numerical investigation of pipeline transport characteristics of slurry shield under gravel stratum. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 71:223–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang Q, Zou JF, Qian ZH (2019) Face stability analysis for a longitudinally inclined tunnel in anisotropic cohesive soils. J Cent South Univ 26(7):1780–1793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu W, Shi P, Chen L, Tang Q (2018) Analytical analysis of working face passive stability during shield tunneling in frictional soils. Acta Geotech 2:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  13. Anagnostou G (2012) The contribution of horizontal arching to tunnel face stability. Geotechnik 35(1):34–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen RP, Li J, Kong LG, Tang LJ (2013) Experimental study on face instability of shield tunnel in sand. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 33:12–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li Y, Emeriault F, Kastner R, Zhang Z (2009) Stability analysis of large slurry shield-driven tunnel in soft clay. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 24(4):472–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang F, Gao Y, Wu Y, Wang Z (2018) Face stability analysis of large-diameter slurry shield-driven tunnels with linearly increasing undrained strength. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 78:178–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou F, Hu X, Meng Q (2015) Model and method of permeability evaluation based on mud invasion effects. Appl Geophys 4:482–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zumsteg R, Puzrin A, Anagnostou G (2016) Effects of slurry on stickiness of excavated clays and clogging of equipment in fluid supported excavations. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 58:197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang K, Zhou J, Zhang L, Jiang T, Xia P, Wang Z (2014) Cake thickness measurement method based on formation testing. CN 104196525A (in Chinese)

  20. Thewes M, Hollmann F (2016) Assessment of clay soils and clay-rich rock for clogging of TBMs. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 57:122–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liao H, Li G, Li J (2012) Flow field study on integrating straight and swirling jets for radial horizontal drilling. J China Coal Soc 37(11):1895–1900

    Google Scholar 

  22. Li J, Song W, Xing Y (2008) Influences of geometric parameters upon nozzle performances in scramjets. Chin J Aeronaut 6:30–35

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was financially supported by the Science and Technology Major Project of Hunan Province, China (Grant No. 2014FJ1002), and the Science and Technology Project of States Grid Corporation of China (Grant No. JSJS1600326).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yimin Xia.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Daniel Onofre de Almeida Cruz, D.Sc.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiao, X., Xia, Y., Mao, X. et al. Effect of the nozzle structure of the large-diameter slurry shield cutterhead on the scouring characteristics. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 42, 157 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-2255-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-2255-0

Keywords

Navigation