Skip to main content
Log in

Discrete element simulation of charging and mixed layer formation in the ironmaking blast furnace

  • Published:
Computational Particle Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The burden distribution in the ironmaking blast furnace plays an important role for the operation as it affects the gas flow distribution, heat and mass transfer, and chemical reactions in the shaft. This work studies certain aspects of burden distribution by small-scale experiments and numerical simulation by the discrete element method (DEM). Particular attention is focused on the complex layer-formation process and the problems associated with estimating the burden layer distribution by burden profile measurements. The formation of mixed layers is studied, and a computational method for estimating the extent of the mixed layer, as well as its voidage, is proposed and applied on the results of the DEM simulations. In studying a charging program and its resulting burden distribution, the mixed layers of coke and pellets were found to show lower voidage than the individual burden layers. The dynamic evolution of the mixed layer during the charging process is also analyzed. The results of the study can be used to gain deeper insight into the complex charging process of the blast furnace, which is useful in the design of new charging programs and for mathematical models that do not consider the full behavior of the particles in the burden layers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kajiwara Y, Jimbo T, Kometani A, Shimoda Y (1984) Application of simulation model for burden distribution to actual operations. Trans ISIJ 24:379–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen J, Akiyama T, Yagi JI (1992) Effect of burden distribution pattern on gas flow in a packed bed. ISIJ Int 32(12):1259–1267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Radhakrishnan VR, Ram KM (2001) Mathematical model for predictive control of the bell-less top charging system of a blast furnace. J Process Control 11:565–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gupta PK, Rao AS, Sekhar VR, Ranjan M, Naha TK (2010) Burden distribution control and its optimisation under high pellet operation. Ironmak Steelmak 37:235–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Park JI, Jung JH, Jo MK, Oh HS, Han JW (2011) Mathematical modelling of the burden distribution in the blast furnace shaft. Met Mater Int 17(3):485–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fan Z, Natsui S, Ueda S, Yang T, Kano J, Inoue R, Ariyama T (2010) Transient behavior of burden descending and influence of cohesive zone shape on solid flow and stress distribution in blast furnace by discrete element method. ISIJ Int 50(7):946–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hattori M, Iino B, Shimomura A, Tsukiji H, Ariyama T (1993) Development of burden distribution simulation model for bell-less top in a large blast furnace and its application. ISIJ Int 33:1070–1077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mitra T, Saxén H (2014) Model for fast evaluation of charging programs in the blast furnace. Metall Mater Trans B 45(6):2382–2394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhu Q, Lu C, Yin Y, Chen X (2013) Burden distribution calculation of bell-less top of blast furnace based on multi-radar data. J Iron Steel Res Int 20(6):33–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nag S, Koranne VM (2009) Development of material trajectory simulation model for blast furnace compact bell-less top. Ironmak Steelmak 36(5):371–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hinnelä J, Saxén H (2001) Neural network model of burden layer formation dynamics in the blast furnace. ISIJ Int 41(2):142–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Saxén H, Hinnelä J (2004) Model for burden distribution tracking in the blast furnace. Miner Process Extr Metall 25:1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mio H, Komatsuki S, Akashi M, Shimosaka A, Shirakawa Y, Hidaka J, Kadowaki M, Matsuzaki S, Kunitomo K (2008) Validation of particle size segregation of sintered ore during flowing through laboratory-scale chute by discrete element method. ISIJ Int 48(12):1696–1703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yu Y, Saxén H (2010) Experimental and DEM study of segregation of ternary size particles in a blast furnace top bunker model. Chem Eng Sci 65(18):5237–5250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu SL, Kou MY, Xu J, Guo XY, Du KP, Shen W, Sun J (2013) DEM simulation of particle size segregation behavior during charging into and discharging from a Paul-Wurth type hopper. Chem Eng Sci 99:314–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ho CK, Wu SM, Zhu HP, Yu AB, Tsai ST (2009) Experimental and numerical investigations of gouge formation related to blast furnace burden distribution. Miner Eng 22:986–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ichida M, Takao M, Morizane Y, Nakayama T, Anan K, Kakiuchi K, Yamada I (2006) Inner profile and burden descent behavior in the blast furnace. Nippon Steel Technical Report No. 94, pp 80–86

  18. Yu Y, Westerlund A, Paananen T, Saxén H (2011) Inter-particle percolation segregation during burden descent in the blast furnace. ISIJ Int 51(7):1050–1056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Song Q (2013) Effect of nut coke on the performance of the ironmaking blast furnace. PhD Thesis, Delft University of Technology

  20. Yu Y, Saxén H (2013) Particle flow and behavior at bell-less charging of the blast furnace. Steel Res Int 84(10):1018–1033

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cundall PA, Strack ODL (1979) A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique 29:47–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yu Y, Saxén H (2012) Effect of DEM parameters on the simulated inter-particle percolation of pellets into coke during burden descent in the blast furnace. ISIJ Int 52(5):788–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Delaney GW, Cleary PW, Hilden M, Morrison RD (2012) Testing the validity of the spherical DEM model in simulating real granular screening processes. Chem Eng Sci 68:215–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Matsumoto M, Nishimura T (1998) Mersenne twister: a 623-dimensionally equidistributed uniform pseudo-random number generator. ACM Trans Model Comput Syst 8(1):3–30

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Propster M, Szekely J (1977) The porosity of systems consisting of layers of different particles. Powder Technnol 17(1):123–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu J, Xue Q, She X, Wang J (2013) Investigation on interface resistance between alternating layers in the upper of blast furnace. Powder Technol 246:73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wu S, Fu C, Liu C, Xu J, Kou M (2011) Coke collapse model and collapse profile variation law for bell-less top BF. J Iron Steel Res Int 18(10):8–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Matsui Y, Shibata K, Ono R (2005) The principle of blast furnace operational technology and centralized gas flow by center coke charging. Kobelco Technol Rev 26:12–20

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fu D, Chen Y, Zhou CQ (2015) Mathematical modeling of blast furnace burden distribution with non-uniform descending speed. Appl Math Model. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2015.02.054

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Graduate School in Chemical Engineering, Tekes and participating industry in the SIMP program coordinated by FIMECC Ltd. are acknowledged for financial support. The discrete element method simulations and analysis were conducted using the EDEM software provided by DEM Solutions Ltd., Edinburgh, Scotland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tamoghna Mitra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mitra, T., Saxén, H. Discrete element simulation of charging and mixed layer formation in the ironmaking blast furnace. Comp. Part. Mech. 3, 541–555 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-015-0084-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-015-0084-1

Keywords

Navigation