Skip to main content
Log in

Transmission Simulator Based MIMO Response Reconstruction

  • Research paper
  • Published:
Experimental Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current industry standard environmental verification testing methods typically employ a single shaker to subject a component to a desired environment in one axis at a time, which has been shown to result in over- or under-testing on the various axes and hence a poor representation of the desired environment. This paper explores a new verification testing methodology based on a combination of the Transmission Simulator Substructuring Method (TSM) with the Impedance Matched Multi Axis Testing (IMMAT) method. The new method seeks to verify the survival of a subcomponent in a given environment using only environmental measurements on the structure to which the subcomponent is attached. A Transmission Simulator (TS) is used to maintain the same connection geometry between the subcomponent and the rest of the vehicle such that the dynamics of the subcomponent are better matched. Impedance Matched Multi Axis Testing is then used to recreate the full environment on the Transmission Simulator in all axes at once. If the impedance between the Transmission Simulator and the subcomponent is sufficiently similar and if the control is successful in reproducing the response on the Transmission Simulator, the motion of the subcomponent of interest should match its motion in the desired environment and produce an accurate reconstruction test. To evaluate this new methodology, simulations were performed using roving hammer data both to optimize the test design and to evaluate the best possible performance. Multi-input-multi-output (MIMO) tests were then performed using a commercial control system to assess the accuracy of the method. These cases showed that the proposed approach was able to reconstruct the desired environment with moderate accuracy, but the response away from the Transmission Simulator was found to be very sensitive to the design of the Transmission Simulator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The flight campaign is described in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-3GDmBZeEg

References

  1. Piersol AG (1965) The development of vibration test specifications for flight vehicle components. J Sound Vibr 4:88–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beale D, Owens B, Schultz RA (2020) Analysis of full-field response from a multi-shaker test. In: Proceedings of the international modal analysis conference (IMAC XXXVIII). Houston

  3. Michael T, Hale A (2018) Technique to develop a spectral density matrix with synthesized rotational degrees-of-freedom. In: Proceedings of the shock and vibration symposium. Dallas

  4. Hale MT (2017) Spectral density matrix transformations. J IEST 60(1):21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Allen MS, Mayes RL, Bergman EJ (2010) Experimental modal substructuring to couple and uncouple substructures with flexible fixtures and multi-point connections. J Sound Vibr 329:4891–4906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mayes RL, Arviso M (2010) Design studies for the transmission simulator method of experimental dynamic substructuring. In: International seminar on modal analysis. Lueven

  7. Mayes RL, Ankers L, Daborn PM (2020) Predicting system response at unmeasured locations. Exp Tech 44:457–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Daborn PM, Roberts C, Ewins DJ, Ind PR (2014) Next-generation random vibration tests. In: Proceedings of the international modal analysis conference (IMAC XXXII). Orlando

  9. Daborn PM, Ind PR, Ewins DJ (2014) Enhanced ground-based vibration testing for aerodynamic environments. Mech Syst Signal Process 49:165–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. van der Seijs MV, van den Bosch DD, Rixen DJ, de Klerk D (2013) An improved methodology for the virtual point transformation of measured frequency response functions in dynamic substructuring. In: 4th ECCOMAS thematic conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering, p 4

  11. van der Seijs MV, de Klerk D, Rixen DJ (2016) General framework for transfer path analysis: history, theory and classification of techniques. Mech Syst Signal Process 68–69:217–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Allen MS, Rixen DJ, van der Seijs MV, Tiso P, Abrahamsson T, Mayes RL (2020) Substructuring in engineering dynamics. Springer International Publishing

  13. Mayes RL, Rohe DP (2016) Physical vibration simulation of an acoustic environment with six shakers on an industrial structure. Shock Vib Aircr Aerosp Energy Harvest Acoust Opt 9:29–41

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schumann CA (2020) Response reconstruction of unmeasured subcomponents using impedance matched multi axis testing. Master’s thesis, University of Wisconsin - Madison

  15. Rohe DP, Nelson GD, Schultz RA (2019) Strategies for shaker placement for impedance-matched multi-axis testing. In: Proceedings of the international modal analysis conference (IMAC XXXVII). Orlando

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M.S. Allen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The Department of Energy’s Kansas City National Security Campus is operated and managed by Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, LLC under contract number DE-NA0002839.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schumann, C., Allen, M., Tuman, M. et al. Transmission Simulator Based MIMO Response Reconstruction. Exp Tech 46, 287–297 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-021-00454-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-021-00454-4

Keywords

Navigation