Skip to main content
Log in

Enhancement of photovoltaic performance by two-step dissolution processed photoactive blend in polymer solar cells

提高聚合物太阳电池性能的新方法: 两步溶解法制备电池活性层

  • Articles
  • Published:
Science China Materials Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We reported enhanced performance of polymer solar cells, based on poly(3-hexylthiophene):[6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester (P3HT:PC61BM) and polythieno[3,4-b]-thiophene-co-benzodithiophene:[6,6]-phenyl-C71-butyric acid methyl ester (PTB7:PC71BM) photovoltaic systems, by a two-step dissolution treatment of photoactive blends. Optical and morphological characterization revealed that the composition of the ordered polymer and donor/acceptor phase structure in the photoactive layer can be optimized using a two-step dissolution treatment. In addition, time-resolved photoluminescence indicated that exciton dissociation efficiency could be increased using this method. Current density-voltage (J-V) measurements showed that power conversion efficiencies (PCE) of the two-step dissolution treated devices were higher than those of one-step treated devices by 24% and 8% for P3HT:PC61BM and PTB7:PC71BM systems, respectively. Therefore, this two-step dissolution treatment further optimizes the performance of polymer solar cells.

摘要

本文以P3HT:PC61BM和PTB7:PC71BM两种有机光伏体系为研究对象, 探讨了光伏材料的“两步”溶解处理对聚合物太阳电池性能的影响. P3HT:PC61BM光活性层的光学与形貌表征揭示了P3HT的有序相结构和给/受体相分离结构可以被“两步”溶解处理进一步优化; 瞬态荧光数据表明, P3HT:PC61BM光活性材料经“两步”溶解处理后, 激子的分离能力得到增强. 经“两步”溶解处理后的器件性能较“一步”溶解处理的器件性能提高了24%. 此外, 同样的处理方式应用于PTB7:PC71BM体系, 可使器件的光伏性能提高8%. 因此, 光活性材料的“两步”溶解处理是一种简单、有效的提高聚合物光伏性能的优化方法.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leonat L, White MS, Głowacki ED, et al. 4% Efficient polymer solar cells on paper substrates. J Phys Chem C, 2014, 118: 16813–16817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tipnis R, Bernkopf J, Jia S, et al. Large-area organic photovoltaic module—fabrication and performance. Solar Energy Mater Solar Cells, 2009, 93: 442–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang JC, Weng WT, Tsai MY, et al. Highly efficient flexible inverted organic solar cells using atomic layer deposited ZnO as electron selective layer. J Mater Chem, 2010, 20: 862–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gaudiana R. Third-generation photovoltaic technology−the potential for low-cost solar energy conversion. J Phys Chem Lett, 2010, 1: 1288–1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen JD, Cui C, Li YQ, et al. Single-junction polymer solar cells exceeding 10% power conversion efficiency. Adv Mater, 2015, 27: 1035–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen CC, Chang WH, Yoshimura K, et al. An efficient triple-junction polymer solar cell having a power conversion efficiency exceeding 11%. Adv Mater, 2014, 26: 5670–5677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang J, Li CZ, Chueh CC, et al. 10.4% power conversion efficiency of ITO-free organic photovoltaics through enhanced light trapping configuration. Adv Energy Mater, 2015, 5: 1500406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang S, Ye L, Zhao W, et al. Realizing over 10% efficiency in polymer solar cell by device optimization. Sci China Chem, 2015, 58: 248–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yao H, Ye L, Fan B, et al. Influence of the alkyl substitution position on photovoltaic properties of 2D-BDT-based conjugated polymers. Sci China Mater, 2015, 58: 213–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Po R, Maggini M, Camaioni N. Polymer solar cells: recent approaches and achievements. J Phys Chem C, 2010, 114: 695–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lu L, Yu L. Understanding low bandgap polymer PTB7 and optimizing polymer solar cells based on it. Adv Mater, 2014, 26: 4413–4430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang W, Hu R, Li D, et al. Primary dynamics of exciton and charge photogeneration in solvent vapor annealed P3HT/PCBM films. J Phys Chem C, 2012, 116: 4298–4310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hu R, Zhang W, Fu LM, et al. Spectroelectrochemical characterization of anionic and cationic polarons in poly(3-hexylthiophene)/ fullerene blend. Effects of morphology and interface. Synth Met, 2013, 169: 41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Clarke TM, Durrant JR. Charge photogeneration in organic solar cells. Chem Rev, 2010, 110: 6736–6767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Guo F, Kubis P, Li N, et al. Solution-processed parallel tandem polymer solar cells using silver nanowires as intermediate electrode. ACS Nano, 2014, 8: 12632–12640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yim JH, Joe S, Pang C, et al. Fully solution-processed semitransparent organic solar cells with a silver nanowire cathode and a conducting polymer anode. ACS Nano, 2014, 8: 2857–2863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Son SK, Kim YS, Son HJ, et al. Correlation between polymer structure and polymer:fullerene blend morphology and its implications for high performance polymer solar cells. J Phys Chem C, 2014, 118: 2237–2244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Constantinou I, Lai TH, Klump ED, et al. Effect of polymer side chains on charge generation and disorder in PBDTTPD solar cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2015, 7: 26999–27005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li G, Shrotriya V, Huang J, et al. High-efficiency solution processable polymer photovoltaic cells by self-organization of polymer blends. Nat Mater, 2005, 4: 864–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chang JF, Sun B, Breiby DW, et al. Enhanced mobility of poly(3-hexylthiophene) transistors by spin-coating from high-boiling-point solvents. Chem Mater, 2004, 16: 4772–4776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yao Y, Hou J, Xu Z, et al. Effects of solvent mixtures on the nanoscale phase separation in polymer solar cells. Adv Funct Mater, 2008, 18: 1783–1789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang F, Jespersen KG, Björström C, et al. Influence of solvent mixing on themorphology and performance of solar cells based on polyfluorene copolymer/fullerene blends. Adv Funct Mater, 2006, 16: 667–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ye L, Zhang S, Ma W, et al. From binary to ternary solvent: morphology fine-tuning of D/A blends in PDPP3T-based polymer solar cells. Adv Mater, 2012, 24: 6335–6341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Agostinelli T, Ferenczi TAM, Pires E, et al. The role of alkane dithiols in controlling polymer crystallization in small band gap polymer:fullerene solar cells. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys, 2011, 49: 1345–1345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. McDonald SA, Konstantatos G, Zhang S, et al. Solution-processed PbS quantum dot infrared photodetectors and photovoltaics. Nat Mater, 2005, 4: 138–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Huang PT, Chang YS, Chou CW. Preparation of porous poly(3-hexylthiophene) by freeze-dry method and its application to organic photovoltaics. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011, 122: 233–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Li L, Lu G, Yang X. Improving performance of polymer photovoltaic devices using an annealing-free approach via construction of ordered aggregates in solution. J Mater Chem, 2008, 18: 1984–1990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Huo MM, Liang R, Xing YD, et al. Side-chain effects on the solution-phase conformations and charge photogeneration dynamics of low-bandgap copolymers. J Chem Phys, 2013, 139: 124904–124904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Huo MM, Hu R, Xing YD, et al. Impacts of side chain and excess energy on the charge photogeneration dynamics of low-bandgap copolymer-fullerene blends. J Chem Phys, 2014, 140: 084903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhao NJ, Lin ZH, Zhang W, et al. Charge photogeneration dynamics of poly(3-hexylthiophene) blend with covalently-linked fullerene derivative in low fraction. J Phys Chem C, 2014, 118: 21377–21384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Spano FC. Modeling disorder in polymer aggregates: the optical spectroscopy of regioregular poly(3-hexylthiophene) thin films. J Chem Phys, 2005, 122: 234701–234701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chien CH, Kung LR, Wu CH, et al. A solution-processable bipolar molecular glass as a host material for white electrophosphorescent devices. J Mater Chem, 2008, 18: 3461–3466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Li D, Liang R, Yue H, Wang P, Fu LM, Zhang JP, Ai XC. Influence of donor and acceptormass ratios on P3HT:PCBM film structure and device performance. Acta Phys-Chim Sin, 2012, 28: 1373–1379

    Google Scholar 

  34. Shrotriya V, Yao Y, Li G, et al. Effect of self-organization in polymer/fullerene bulk heterojunctions on solar cell performance. Appl Phys Lett, 2006, 89: 063505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Scharber MC, Mühlbacher D, Koppe M, et al. Design rules for donors in bulk-heterojunction solar cells—towards 10 % energyconversion efficiency. Adv Mater, 2006, 18: 789–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tsoi WC, Spencer SJ, Yang L, et al. Effect of crystallization on the electronic energy levels and thin film morphology of P3HT:PCBM blends. Macromolecules, 2011, 44: 2944–2952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Guo J, Ohkita H, Yokoya S, et al. Bimodal polarons and hole transport in poly(3-hexylthiophene):fullerene blend films. J Am Chem Soc, 2010, 132: 9631–9637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ohzeki M, Fujii S, Arai Y, et al. Performance improvement of flexible bulk heterojunction solar cells using PTB7:PC71 BM by optimizing spin coating and drying processes. Jpn J Appl Phys, 2014, 53: 02BE04

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Guo S, Ning J, Körstgens V, et al. The effect of fluorination in manipulating the nanomorphology in PTB7:PC71 BM bulk heterojunction systems. Adv Energy Mater, 2015, 5: 1401315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yang T, Wang M, Duan C, et al. Inverted polymer solar cells with 8.4% efficiency by conjugated polyelectrolyte. Energy Environ Sci, 2012, 5: 8208–8214

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wei Zhang  (张伟), Chaozhong Guo  (郭朝中) or Kaibo Zheng  (郑凯波).

Additional information

These authors contributed equally to this work.

Rong Hu received his PhD degree from Renmin University of China in 2014. He is a lecturer at the Research Institute for New Materials Technology of Chongqing University of Arts and Science. His current research interests are the fabrication of organic photovoltaic devices.

Jiang Cheng received his PhD degree from Sichuan University in 2012. He is a lecturer at the Research Institute for New Materials Technology of Chongqing University of Arts and Science. His current research interests are earth abundant photovoltaic materials and organic photovoltaic devices.

Wei Zhang received his PhD degree in optics from the Department of Physics, Harbin Institute of Technology in 2013. He is currently a postdoctoral researcher at the Division of Chemical Physics, Lund University. His research interest includes charge photogeneration and recombination process in polymer solar cells and group III-V nanowires.

Chaozhong Guo received his PhD degree at Chongqing University in 2013. He is an associate professor of chemical engineering and top-notch talent at Chongqing University. His research focuses on green synthesis of graphdiyne-based nanomaterials, including composites derived from conductive nanopolymers and applications in energy conversion and storage.

Kaibo Zheng received his PhD degree from the Department of Material Science, Fudan University in 2010. He is now a senior researcher at the Department of Chemical Physics at Lund University, Sweden. His research interests include design, structural characterization, and ultrafast photo-induced dynamics of nanostructured optoelectronicmaterials such as semiconductor quantum dots, nanowires, and perovskite materials.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, R., Cheng, J., Ni, H. et al. Enhancement of photovoltaic performance by two-step dissolution processed photoactive blend in polymer solar cells. Sci. China Mater. 59, 842–850 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-016-5128-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-016-5128-0

Keywords

Navigation