Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of Existing Empirical Equations for Blast Peak Positive Overpressure from Spherical Free Air and Hemispherical Surface Bursts

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The blast-induced impulsive loads due to unabated accidental and man-made explosions on structures are receiving attention from structural designers. Recent devastating Beirut ammonium nitrate explosion and very recent blast at a chemical factory on the outskirts of Bangkok are examples of the accidental explosions. Such loading applies a high-intensity pressure over a very short duration (microsecond to the millisecond), is generally more damaging than quasi-static and other less intense dynamic loadings induced by wind, wave, or earthquake. The positive phase of the blast load is generally considered in the analysis neglecting the negative phase being less impulsive to cause significant damage to the structure. A number of available empirical relations predict blast wave parameters and each relation validates its experimental results, however, the proposed relations had not been vetted with different available experimental data. In this paper, several existing empirical equations proposed by various researchers for blast peak positive overpressure of spherical free-air and hemispherical surface-bursts, the arrival time of air-blast shockwave, and positive phase duration of the blast are presented and compared with the available experimental results and predictions of blast design manuals UFC 3–340-02(2008) and IS 4991:1968 for a span of scaled distances. The phenomenon of the blast is explained and a list of technical documents and required accessories to measure the experimental response is provided. The limitations of the empirical relationships are explored. This study is useful to structural engineers and researchers for the blast-resistant design of structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Ca :

Speed of sound in air (340 m/sec)

POP :

Peak overpressure or incident blast pressure (MPa)

PO :

Ambient air-pressure (≈0.10 MPa)

Ps :

Maximum negative overpressure (MPa)

P(t):

Time-dependent blast pressure or air-blast wave pressure (MPa)

S:

Standoff or detonation distance (m)

H:

Height of burst (m)

TNT:

Tri-nitro toluene

TATP:

Tri-acetone tri-peroxide

t A :

Time of arrival of shock wave (ms)

t 1 :

Rising time duration (ms)

t 2 :

Decreasing time duration (ms)

t d :

Duration of positive phase (ms)

W:

Weight of explosive or Explosive charge or Yield of explosive (kg-TNT)

WE :

Effective charge weight (kg-TNT)

WX :

Weight of particular explosive (kg)

Z:

Scaled distance or Proximity factor (m/kg1/3)

ρ :

Density (kg/m3)

u :

Particle velocity (m/sec)

References

  • Adushkin VV, Korotkov AI (1961) Parameters of a shock wave near to HE charge at explosion in air. PMTF, 5

  • Ahmad S, Taseer M, Pervaiz H (2012) Effects of impulsive loading on reinforced concrete structures. University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila, Pakistan, Technical Journal

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad S, Elahi A, Pervaiz H, Rahman AG, Barbhuiya S (2014) Experimental study of masonry wall exposed to blast loading. Materiales de Construccion, 64

  • American Society of Civil Engineers (1997) Design of blast-resistant buildings in petrochemical facilities. ASCE, Reston, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • American Society of Civil Engineers (1999) Structural design for physical security: state of the practice. ASCE, Reston, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • American Society of Civil Engineers (2011) Blast protection of buildings. ASCE/SEI 59–11

  • Anas MS, Ansari MdI, Alam M (2020b) Performance of masonry heritage building under air-blast pressure without and with ground shock. Aust J Struct Eng 21(4):329–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anas MS, Alam M, Umair M (2021b) Experimental and numerical investigations on performance of reinforced concrete slabs under explosive-induced air-blast loading: a state-of-the-art review. Structu Elsevier 31:428–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Anas M S, Alam M, and Umair M (2020) Performance of one-way composite reinforced concrete slabs under explosiveinduced blast loading. IOP conference series: earth and environmental science, Vol. 614, 1st International conference on energetics, civil and agricultural engineering 2020, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

  • Anas MS, Alam M, Umair M (2021) Performance of one-way concrete slabs reinforced with conventional and polymer re-bars under air-blast loading. In: Chandrasekaran S, Kumar S, Madhuri S (eds) Recent advances in structural engineering, lecture notes in civil engineering, 135, pp. 179–191

  • Anas MS, Ansari Md I, Alam M, A study on existing masonry heritage building to explosive-induced blast loading and its response. Int J Struct Eng, (Article in press)

  • Bajic Z (2007) Determination of TNT equivalent for various explosives. University of Belgrade, Sebria

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker W, Cox PA, Westine PS, Kulesz JJ, Strehlow RA (1983) Explosion hazards and evaluation. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Beshara ABF (1994) Modelling of blast loading on aboveground structures – I. General phenomenology and external blast. Comput Struct, 51

  • Bureau of Indian Standards (1968) Criteria for blast resistant design of structures for explosions above ground. IS 4991

  • Bureau of Indian Standards (1973) Criteria for safety and design of structures subject to underground blasts. IS 6922

  • Chang DB, Young CS (2010) Probabilistic estimates of vulnerability to explosive overpressures and impulses. J Phys Sec, 4

  • Edward DE (1992) Spherical equivalency of cylindrical charges in free-air. 25th department of defense explosives safety seminar

  • Gelfand B, Silnikov M (2004) Blast effects caused by explosions. DTIC Document, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Goel DM, Matsagar AV (2014) Blast-resistant design of structures. ASCE, Practice periodical on structural design and construction

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goel DM, Matsagar AV, Gupta KA, Marburg S (2012) An abridged review of blast wave parameters. Def Sci J 62(5):300–306

  • Hao H, Hao Y, Li J, Chen W (2016) Review of the current practices in blast-resistant analysis and design of concrete structures. Adv Struct Eng, SAGE 19(8):1–31

  • Harold LB (1955) Numerical solutions of spherical blast waves. J Appl Phys 26(6):766–775

  • Held M (1983) Blast waves in free air. Propell Explos Pyrotech 8(1):1–7

  • Hopkins BM, Bailey A (1998) Chapter 2, explosion effects (Part -1). AASTP-4 royal military college of science, Cranfield University

  • Iqbal J, Ahmad S (2011) Improving safety provisions of structural design of containment against external explosion. In: Proceeding international conference on opportunities and challenges for water cooled reactors in the 21st Century, IAEA

  • Izadifard RA, Foroutan M (2010) Blast wave parameters assessment at different altitude using numerical simulation. Turkish J Eng Environ Sci 34(1):25–42

  • Izadifard R. A. and Maheri M. R. Ductility effects on the behavior of steel structures under blast loading. Iranian J. of Science and Technology, Transaction B Engineering, Vol. 34, No. B1, pp. 49–62 (2010).

  • Izadifard RA, Maheri MR (2010a) Application of displacement-based design method to assess the level of structural damage due to blast loads. J Mech Sci Technol 24(3):649–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeremic R. and Bajic Z (2006) An approach to determining the TNT equivalent of high explosives. Sci Technol 56(1):58–62

  • Joint Department of the Army (1990) The Navy and the Air Force. Structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions. Technical Manual TM 5–1300, Department of Defence Explosives Safety Board, Alexandria, Virginia

  • Josef H, Rudolph M (1979) The dynamics of explosion and its use. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadid A, Nezzar B, Dorra Y (2012) Nonlinear dynamic analysis of reinforced concrete slabs subjected to blast loading. Asian J Civ Eng 13(5):617–634

  • Kangarlou K (2013) Mechanics of blast loading on the head models in the study of traumatic brain injury. Nationalpark-Forschung In Der Schweiz 102(11):1571–1581

  • Katselis G, Anderson GJ (2001) Estimation of blast overpressure from a cylindrical charge using time of arrival sensors. In: 14th Australian fluid mechanics conference, Adelaide, Australia

  • Kingery CN, Bulmash G (1984) Air blast parameters from TNT spherical air burst and hemispherical surface burst. Ballistic Research Laboratories

  • Kinney G, Graham KJ (1985) Explosive shocks in air. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Larcher M (2008) Pressure-time functions for the description of air blast waves. Technical Report, Joint Research Center, Ispra, Italy

  • Li Y, Ma S (1992) Explosion mechanics. Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Low HY, Hao H (2001) Reliability analysis of reinforced concrete slabs under explosive loading. Struct Saf 23(2):157–178

  • Mills CA (1987) The design of concrete structure to resist explosions and weapon effects. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on concrete for hazard protections

  • Mitalas R, Harvey RB (1958) Peak pressures from distance/time data of an expanding spherical shock wave. Suffield Technical Paper No. 130, Suffield Experimental Station

  • National Research Council (1995) Protecting buildings from bomb damage. NRCNational Academy Press, Washington, DC

  • Nemati M, Abdollahzadeh G (2013) Risk assessment of structures subjected to blast. Int J Damag Mech 23(1):3–24

  • Newmark NM, Hansen RJ (1961) Design of blast resistant structures. Shock and Vibration handbook, Mc Graw-Hill, New York

  • Pachman J, Matyas R, Kunzel M (2014) Study of TATP: blast characteristics and TNT equivalency of small charges. Springer, Shock Waves

    Google Scholar 

  • Pannill F, Kingery NC (1964) Peak overpressure vs scaled distance for TNT surface bursts (hemispherical charges). Ballistic Research Laboratories, Defense Documentation Center, Alexandria, Virginia

  • American Society of Civil Engineers (1985). Design of structures to resist nuclear weapons effects. ASCE Manual No. 42, Reston, VA

  • Rigby ES, Lodge JT, Alotaibi S, Barr DA, Clarke DS, Langdon SG, Tyas A (2020) Preliminary yield estimation of the 2020 Beirut explosion using video footage from social media. Shock Waves 30:671–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadovskyi MA (2004) Mechanical effects of air shock waves from explosions according to experiments. Nauka Press, Moscow, Geophysics and physics of explosion

    Google Scholar 

  • Saska P, Krzystala E, Mezyk A (2011) An analysis of an explosive shock wave impact onto military vehicles of contemporary warfare. J Kones Powertrain Transp 18(1):515–524

  • Siddiqui IJ, Ahmad S (2007) Impulsive loading on a concrete structure. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Structures and Buildings 160

  • Smith PD, Hetherington JG (1994) Blast and ballistic loading of structures. Butterworth Heinemann Oxford, UK

  • Smith PD, Mays GC (1995) Blast effects on buildings: design of buildings to optimize resistance to blast loading. Thomas Telford, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Swisdak MM (1994) Simplified kingery air-blast calculations. Minutes of the Twenty Sixth DoD Explosives Safety Seminar, Maryland

  • U.S. Department of the Army (1986) Design & analysis of hardened structures to conventional weapons effects. Technical Manual, TM 5–855–1

  • U.S. Air Force Engineering and Services Center (1989) Protective construction design manual. ESL-TR 87–57, Air Force Base, Florida

  • U.S. Department of Energy (1992) Manual for the prediction of blast and fragment loading for structures. DOE/TIC-11268, Washington

  • U.S. Army Corporations of Engineers (2008) Structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions. Unified Facilities Criteria, UFC (3–340–02)

  • Vijayaraghavan C, Thirumalaivasan D, Venkatesan R (2012) A study on nuclear blast overpressure on buildings and other infrastructures using geospatial technology. J Comput Sci 8(9):1520–1530

  • Wu C, Hao H (2005) Modelling of simultaneous ground shock and airblast pressure on nearby structures from surface explosions. Int J Impact Eng 31(6):699–717

  • Wu C, Whittaker A (2010) Investigation of air-blast effects from spherical and cylindrical-shaped charges. Int J Protect Struct 1

  • Yin X, Gu X, Lin F, Kuang X (2009) Numerical analysis of blast loads inside buildings. Springer, Computational Structural Engineering

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. M. Anas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. None of the authors of this paper has a financial or personal relationship with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anas, S.M., Alam, M. Comparison of Existing Empirical Equations for Blast Peak Positive Overpressure from Spherical Free Air and Hemispherical Surface Bursts. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 46, 965–984 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-021-00718-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-021-00718-4

Keywords

Navigation