Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Resistance of Blast Furnace Slag- and Ferrochrome Slag-Based Geopolymer Concrete Against Acid Attack

  • Research paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, blast furnace slag- (BFS) and Elazığ ferrochrome slag (EFS)-based geopolymer concretes were produced. Samples were immersed in 5% phosphoric acid (H3PO4), hydrochloric acid (HCl), hydrofluoric acid (HF) and sulfuric acid (H2SO4) solutions for 12 weeks. The compressive strengths, ultrasonic pulse velocities, weight and length changes of the samples were determined in this process. At the same time, visual inspections of the samples were investigated. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis was performed for the microstructure analysis of the samples removed from the solutions. 5% H2SO4 solution had the most negative effect on the samples. As the EFS ratio in the geopolymer concrete mixture increased, the loss rate in the strength of the samples exposed to acid solutions decreased. H3PO4 solution caused less weight loss in samples than other acid solutions. It was seen that the samples immersed in H3PO4 and HCl solutions shrank and that the samples immersed in HF and H2SO4 solutions expanded. Softening, cracking and corruption occurred on the surfaces of the samples exposed to the acid solutions for 12 weeks. With increasing EFS ratio in the mixture, the deterioration of the samples’ surfaces exposed to acid solutions decreased. Ettringite formations were seen in the SEM images of geopolymer concretes immersed in 5% H2SO4 solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thokchom S, Ghosh P, Ghosh S (2009) Effect of Na2O content on durability of geopolymer mortars in sulphuric acid. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Science Index 27. Int J Civil Environ Struct Constr Arch Eng 3(3):193–198

    Google Scholar 

  2. Singh B, Ishwarya G, Gupta M, Bhattacharyya SK (2015) Geopolymer concrete: a review of some recent developments. Constr Build Mater 85:78–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hewayde E, Nehdi M, Allouche E, Nakhla G (2006) Effect of geopolymer cement on microstructure, compressive strength and sulphuric acid resistance of concrete. Mag Concr Res 58(5):321–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Davidovit J (1991) Geopolymers: inorganic polymeric new materials. J Therm Anal 37:1633–1656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Niemelä P, Kauppi M (2007) Production, characteristics and use of ferrochromium slags Infacon XI, February 18–21, Taj Place, New Delhi, India, pp 171–179

  6. Imbabi MS, CarriganC McKenna S (2012) Trends and developments in green cement and concrete technology. Int J Sustain Built Environ 1:194–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Monteny J, De Belie N, Vincke E, Verstraete W, Taerwe L (2001) Chemical and microbiological tests to simulate sulfuric acid corrosion of polymer-modified concrete. Cem Concr Res 31:1359–1365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bakharev T (2005) Resistance of geopolymer materials to acid attack. Cem Concr Res 35:658–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ariffin MAM, Bhutta MAR, Hussin MW, Tahir MM, Aziah N (2013) Sulfuric acid resistance of blended ash geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 43:80–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Acharya PK, Patro SK (2016) Acid resistance, sulphate resistance and strength properties of concrete containing ferrochrome ash (FA) and lime. Constr Build Mater 120:241–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nuaklong P, Sata V, Chindaprasirt P (2018) Properties of metakaolin-high calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete containing recycled aggregate from crushed concrete specimens. Constr Build Mater 161:365–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Singh M, Siddique R (2014) Compressive strength, drying shrinkage and chemical resistance of concrete incorporating coal bottom ash as partial or total replacement of sand. Constr Build Mater 68:39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ganesan N, Abraham R, Raj SD (2015) Durability characteristics of steel fibre reinforced geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 93:471–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Deb PS, Sarker PK, Barbhuiya S (2016) Sorptivity and acid resistance of ambient-cured geopolymer mortars containing nano-silica. Cement Concr Compos 72:235–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Djobo JNY, Elimbi A, Tchakouté HK, Kumar S (2016) Mechanical properties and durability of volcanic ash based geopolymer mortars. Constr Build Mater 124:606–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mehta A, Siddique R (2017) Sulfuric acid resistance of fly ash based geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 146:136–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sata V, Sathonsaowaphak A, Chindaprasirt P (2012) Resistance of lignite bottom ash geopolymer mortar to sulfate and sulfuric acid attack. Cement Concr Compos 34:700–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wei B, Zhang Y, Bao S (2017) Preparation of geopolymers from vanadium tailings by mechanical activation. Constr Build Mater 145:236–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kwasny J, Aiken TA, Soutsos MN, McIntosh JA, Cleland DJ (2018) Sulfate and acid resistance of lithomarge-based geopolymer mortars. Constr Build Mater 166:537–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. ASTM International (2012) Standard test methods for chemical resistance of mortars, grouts, and monolithic surfacings and polymer concretes. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. https://www.astm.org/

    Google Scholar 

  21. ASTM C597-16 (2016) Standard test method for pulse velocity through concrete. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. https://www.astm.org/

    Google Scholar 

  22. ASTM C39/C39M-18 (2018) Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. https://www.astm.org/

    Google Scholar 

  23. Baradan B, Yazıcı H, Ün H (2002) Durability in reinforced concrete structures. Engineering Faculty, Dokuz Eylul Univ., Izmir, pp 282

  24. Tharmaratnam K, Tan BS (1990) Attenuation of ultrasonic pulse in cement mortar. Cement Concrete Res 20:335–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Demirboga R, Türkmen İ, Karakoç MB (2004) Relationship between ultrasonic pulse velocity and compressive strength for high-volume mineral-admixtured concrete. Cement Concrete Res 34:2329–2336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Omer SA, Demirboga R, Khushefati WH (2015) Relationship between compressive strength and UPV of GGBFS based geopolymer mortars exposed to elevated temperatures. Constr Build Mater 94:189–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research work reported in this paper was supported within the research project number BAP 2016/115 by Inonu University, Scientific Research Project program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Inonu University, 44280, Malatya, Turkey

    Mehmet Burhan Karakoç

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Kütahya Dumlupınar University, Kütahya, Turkey

    Ahmet Özcan

Authors
  1. Ahmet Özcan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mehmet Burhan Karakoç
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Burhan Karakoç.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Özcan, A., Karakoç, M.B. The Resistance of Blast Furnace Slag- and Ferrochrome Slag-Based Geopolymer Concrete Against Acid Attack. Int J Civ Eng 17, 1571–1583 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-019-00425-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-019-00425-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation