Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Preservice teacher learning experiences of entrepreneurial thinking in a STEM investigation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Entrepreneurship Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Connections between innovation policy and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education practices are poorly defined across a variety of national and international contexts. This disconnect is particularly evident in countries such as Australia that are not traditionally associated with an entrepreneurial culture. This study explores connections between entrepreneurial thinking and STEM education in the context of a preservice teaching course where learning is experienced through an integrated STEM investigation project. An entrepreneurial problem-validation technique is applied by preservice teachers as the starting point for their investigation, and it is the performance and experience of learning through that technique, which is the focus of this paper. My research question is: How do preservice teachers perform and experience entrepreneurial validated learning as part of a STEM investigation? To address this question, the study is informed by a phenomenological orientation drawing upon preservice teachers’ investigation reports and reflective journals. Data were analyzed using a phenomenological form of inductive analysis to develop key themes that describe learning experiences when generating and validating ideas and problems for a STEM investigation. Findings from this study point to the emotional experiences of learning through entrepreneurial thinking, how these experiences challenge learner values, and the need to explore further the connections between entrepreneurial thinking and STEM education in naturalistic contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aulet, B. (2013). Disciplined entrepreneurship: 24 steps to a successful startup. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aziz, A. A. A., & Rowland, S. (2018). The entrepreneurship skills that biotechnology graduates need: Findings from entrepreneurial employees in a developing economy. Entrepreneurship Education, 1, 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41959-018-0006-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellocchi, A. (2018). Negative emotional events during science inquiry. In S. M. Ritchie & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), Eventful learning: Learner emotions (pp. 87–104). Leiden: Brill/Sense. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004377912_005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellocchi, A., & Ritchie, S. M. (2015). “I was proud of myself that I didn’t give up and I did it”: Experiences of pride and triumph in learning science. Science Education, 99, 638–668. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blank, S. G. (2013). The four steps to the epiphany: Successful strategies for products that win. New York: Steve G. Blank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, S. G. (2018, August 20). New TV is the antithesis of a lean startup. Can it work? Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2018/08/newtv-is-the-antithesis-of-a-lean-startup-can-it-work. Accessed 1 Dec 2018.

  • Chirema, K. D. (2006). The use of reflective journals in the promotion of reflection and learning in post-registration nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 27, 192–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. P., & Bellocchi, A. (2018). Objectivity, subjectivity, and emotion in school science inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55, 1419–1447. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. P., Chandra, V., & Bellocchi, A. (in press). Integrated STEM in initial teacher education: Tackling diverse epistemologies. In P. Sengupta, M.-C. Shanahan & B. Kim (Eds.), Critical, transdisciplinary and embodied approaches in STEM education. Springer: The Netherlands.

  • Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2006). Complexity and Education: Inquiries into learning, teaching, and research. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhart, M. (2009). Generalization from qualitative inquiry. In K. Ercikan & W.-M. Roth (Eds.), Generalizing from education research: Beyond qualitative and quantitative polarization (pp. 51–66). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. (2007). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62, 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, L. D. (2016). STEM Education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. (2011). Teaching entrepreneurship to undergraduates. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, M. E., Kleinsasser, R. C., & Roe, M. F. (2014). Wicked problems: inescapable wickedity. Journal of Education for Teaching, 40, 415–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2014.929381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, D., Ritchie, S. M., Sandhu, M., Henderson, S., & Boland, B. (2017). Temporality of emotion: Antecedent and successive variants of frustration when learning chemistry. Science Education, 101, 639–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lean Startup Machine. (2018). Validation board. Retrieved from https://www.leanstartupmachine.com/validationboard/ on 24 August 2018.

  • Nadelson, L. S., & Seifert, A. L. (2017). Integrated STEM defined: Contexts, challenges, and the future. The Journal of Educational Research, 110, 221–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2017.1289775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Chief Scientist. (2015). Boosting high-impact entrepreneurship in Australia: A role for universities. Canberra: Australian Government, Office of the Chief Scientist.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterwald, A., & Pigneur, V. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers and challengers. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panizzon, D., & Corrigan, D. (2017). Innovation and entrepreneurship as economic change agents: The role of STEM Education in Australia. Conexao, 12, 199–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quality Assurance Agency. (2018). Enterprise and entrepreneurship education: Guidance for UK higher education providers. Retrieved from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaas/enhancement-and-development/enterprise-and-entrpreneurship-education-2018.pdf?sfvrsn=15f1f981_8 on 30 August 2018

  • Ries, E. (2014). The lean startup: How today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. New York: Crown Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. (2009). Phenomenological and dialectical perspective on the relation between the general and the particular. In K. Ercikan & W.-M. Roth (Eds.), Generalizing from education research: Beyond qualitative and quantitative polarization (pp. 235–260). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shernoff, D. J., Sinha, S., Bressler, D. M., & Ginsburg, L. (2017). Assessing teacher education and professional development needs for the implementation of integrated approaches to STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 4, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0068-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, A., & Maltese, A. (2016). Failure is a major component of learning anything: The role of failure in the development of STEM professionals. Journal of Science Education and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9674-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • STEM Task Force Report. (2014). Innovate: a blueprint for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics in California public education. Dublin, California: Californians Dedicated to Education Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valiela, I. (2001). Doing science: Design, analysis, and communication of scientific research. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Manen, M. (1997). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Walnut Creek CA: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by the STEM Education Research Group and the School of Teacher Education and Leadership of the Faculty of Education, Queensland University of Technology (AU). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Queensland University of Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Queensland University of Technology, Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia

    James P. Davis

Authors
  1. James P. Davis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James P. Davis.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 20 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Davis, J.P. Preservice teacher learning experiences of entrepreneurial thinking in a STEM investigation. Entrep Educ 2, 1–17 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41959-019-00009-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41959-019-00009-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation