Skip to main content
Log in

An Equivalent Modeling Method for Honeycomb Sandwich Structure Based on Orthogonal Anisotropic Solid Element

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An equivalent modeling method for honeycomb sandwich structure is presented in this paper. Honeycomb core is regarded as an interlayer and orthogonal anisotropic solid elements are used to model it, while the panels of honeycomb sandwich structure are represented by shell elements. This method not only controls model size and ensures computational efficiency, but also solves the problem that two-dimensional model cannot represent the internal stress distribution and local deformation. Based on the orthogonal anisotropy of honeycomb and the actual cellular size, 9 independent elastic parameters of the interlayer are given, so that the physical properties of the interlayer are described completely. In the example, the displacement errors under typical static loadcases are less than 3.12% and the frequency errors of the first six orders are less than 4.07%, compared with the precise model. A modal tapping test was carried out on a payload mounting panel with honeycomb sandwich structure. By comparing the test data with the analysis data of the equivalent model, it was shown that the frequency errors of the first six orders were all within 5%, and the analysis modes were consistent with the experimental fitting modes, which further verified the validity of the equivalent method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lim J, Lee D (2011) Development of the hybrid insert for composite sandwich satellite structures. Compos Part A 42:1040–1048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dong J, Zhu G (2016) Mechanical analysis and bionic structure design of astronautic payloads based on natural honeycomb. J Astronaut 37(3):262–267 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schafer K, Gohler C, Troltzsch J et al (2019) Textile-based surface design of thermoplastic composites for microstructural adhesion to polyurethane foams for lightweight structures. Compos Interfaces 26(4):339–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim B, Lee D (2010) Development of a satellite structure with the sandwich T-joint. Compos Struct 92:460–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Watarai H, Katayama H, Tadono T et al (2018) Current development status of the wide-swath and high-resolution optical imager onboard advanced optical satellite (ALOS-3). Proc SPIE 10785:107850P

    Google Scholar 

  6. Blecha L, Zindel D, Cottard H et al (2016) Analytical optimization and test validation of the sub-micron dimensional stability of the CHEOPS space telescope’s CFRP structure. In: Proc. of SPIE, vol 9912, p 99121G

  7. Tanimoto Y, Nishiwaki T, Shiomi T et al (2001) A numerical modeling for eigenvibration analysis of honeycomb sandwich panels. Compos Interfaces 8(6):393–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guj L, Sestieri A (2007) Dynamic modeling of honeycomb sandwich panel. Arch Appl Mech 77:779–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jiang D, Zhang D, Fei Q et al (2014) An approach on identification of equivalent properties of honeycomb core using experimental modal data. Finite Elem Anal Des 90:84–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Qin Y, Kong X, Luo W (2011) RSM-based FEM model updating for a carbon fiber honeycomb sandwich panel. J Vib Shock 30(7):71–76 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cho H, Rhee J (2011) Vibration in a satellite structure with a laminate composite hybrid sandwich panel. Compos Struct 93:2566–2574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang T (2011) Analysis of sandwich structure and research of structural design for satellite. Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, pp 15–25 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1988) Cellular solids, structure and properties. Pergamon Press, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF, Schajer GS et al (1982) The mechanics of two-dimensional cellular materials. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A 382:25–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Burton WS, Noor AK (1997) Assessment of continuum models for sandwich panel honeycomb cores. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 145:341–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fu M, Yin J (1999) Equivalent elastic parameters of the honeycomb core. Acta Mech Sin 31(1):113–118 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fu M, Xu O, Chen Y (2015) An overview of equivalent parameters of honeycomb cores. Materials Review 29(3):127–134 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kelsey S, Gellatly RA, Clark BW (1958) The shear modulus of foil honeycomb cores. In: Aircraft engineering, pp 294–302

Download references

Funding

The National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFB0500904).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lei Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yuan, J., Zhang, L. & Huo, Z. An Equivalent Modeling Method for Honeycomb Sandwich Structure Based on Orthogonal Anisotropic Solid Element. Int. J. Aeronaut. Space Sci. 21, 957–969 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-020-00259-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-020-00259-6

Keywords

Navigation