This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
ACT, Inc. (1995). Work keys. Iowa City, IA: Author.
ACT, Inc. (1998). Assessing listening comprehension: A review of recent literature relevant to an LSAT Listening Component [Unpublished manuscript]. Newton, PA: Law School Admission Council.
ACT, Inc. (1999). Technical Manual for the ESL Exam. Iowa City, IA: Author.
Baker, E.L., & O’Neil, H.F., Jr. (1995). Computer technology futures for the improvement of assessment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4, 37–45.
Bejar, I. I. (1991). A methodology for scoring open-ended architectural design problems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 522–532.
Bennett, R.E. (1998). Reinventing assessment. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Bennett, R.E., & Bejar, I.I. (1999). Validity and automatedscoring: It’s not only the scoring. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 17, 9–17.
Bennett, R. E., Goodman, M., Hessinger, J., Ligget, J., Marshall, G., Kahn, H., & Zack, J. (1997). Using multimedia in large-scale computer-based testing programs. (Research Rep. No. RR-97-3). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Bennett, R. E., & Sebrechts, M. M. (1997). A computer-based task for measuring the representational component of quantitative proficiency. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 64–77.
Bennett, R.E., Steffen, M., Singley, M.K., Morley, M., & Jacquemin, D. (1997). Evaluating an automatically scorable, open-ended response type for measuring mathematical reasoning in computer-adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 162–176.
Bennett, R. E., Morley, M., & Quardt, D. (1998, April). Three response types for broadening the conception of mathematical problem solving in computerized-adaptive tests. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education, San Diego, CA.
Booth, J. (1991). The key to valid computer-based testing: The user interface. European Review of Applied Psychology, 41, 281–293.
Bosman, F., Hoogenboom, J., & Walpot, G. (1994). An interactive video test for pharmaceutical chemist’s assistants. Computers in Human Behavior, 10, 51–62.
Braun, H.I. (1994). Assessing technology in assessment. In E. L. Baker & H. F. O’Neil (Eds.), Technology assessment in education and training (pp. 231–246). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Braun, H.I., Bennett, R.E., Frye, D., & Soloway, E. (1990). Scoring constructed responses using expert systems. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 93–108.
Breland, H.M. (1998, April). Writing assessment through automated editing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, San Diego.
Bugbee, A. C., Jr., & Bernt, F. M. (1990). Testing by computer: Findings in six years of use. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 23, 87–100.
Burstein, J., Kukich, K., Wolff, S., Lu, C., & Chodorow, M. (1998, April). Computer analysis of essays. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, San Diego.
Buxton, W.A.S. (1987). There’s more to interaction than meets the eye: Some issues in manual input. In R. M. Baecker & W. A. S. Buxton (Eds.) Readings in human-computer interaction: A multidisciplinary approach (pp.366–375). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Clauser, B.E., Margolis, M.J., Clyman, S.G., & Ross, L.P. (1997). Development of automated scoring algorithms for complex performance assessments: A comparison of two approaches. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 141–161.
Clauser, B.E., Ross, L.P., Clyman, S.G., Rose, K.M., Margolis, M.J., Nungester, R.J., Piemme, T.E., Chang, L., El-Bayoumi, G., Malakoff, G.L., & Pincetl, P.S. (1997). Development of a scoring algorithm to replace expert rating for scoring a complex performance-based assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 10, 345–358.
Davey, T., Godwin, J., & Mittelholtz, D. (1997). Developing and scoring an innovative computerized writing assessment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 21–41.
Dodd, B. G., & Fitzpatrick, S.J. (1998). Alternatives for scoring computer-based tests. Paper presented at the ETS Colloquium on Computer-based testing: Building the foundation for future assessments, Philadelphia, PA.
Drasgow, F., Olson-Buchanan, J. B., & Moberg, P. J. (1999). Development of an interactive video assessment: Trials and tribulations. In F. Drasgow & J. B. Olson-Buchanan, (Eds.), Innovations in computerized assessment (pp 177–196). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
ETS. (1998). Computer-Based TOEFL Score User Guide. Princeton, NJ: Author.
Fitch, W. T., & Kramer, G. (1994). Sonifying the body electric: Superiority of an auditory over a visual display in a complex, multivariate system. In G. Kramer (Ed.), Auditory Display (pp. 307–325). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
French, A., & Godwin, J. (1996, April). Using multimedia technology to create innovative items. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New York, NY.
Gaver, W. W. (1989). The SonicFinder: An interface that uses auditory icons. Human-Computer Interaction, 4, 67–94.
Gruber, J. S. (1998, October). Groupthink [Interview with James Kramer, Head of Virtual Technologies, Inc.]. Wired, 168–169.
Godwin, J. (1999, April). Designing the ACT ESL Listening Test. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Montreal, Canada.
Koch, D. A. (1993). Testing goes graphical. Journal of Interactive Instruction Development, 5, 14–21.
Luecht, R. M., & Clauser, B. E. (1998, September). Test models for complex computer-based testing. Paper presented at the ETS Colloquium on Computer-based testing: Building the foundation for future assessments, Philadelphia, PA.
Martinez, M. E. (1991). A comparison of multiple choice and constructed figural response items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 28, 131–145.
Martinez, M. E. (1993). Item formats and mental abilities in biology assessment. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 12, 289–301.
Martinez, M.E., & Bennett, R.E. (1992). A review of automatically scorable constructed-response item types for large-scale assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 5, 151–169.
Nissan, S. (1999, April). Incorporating sound, visuals, and text for TOEFL on computer. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Montreal, Canada.
Olson-Buchanan, J. B., Drasgow, F., Moberg, P. J., Mead, A. D., Keenan, P.A., & Donovan, M.A. (1998). Interactive video assessment of conflict resolution skills. Personnel Psychology, 51, 1–24.
O’Neill, K., & Folk, V. (1996, April). Innovative CBT item formats in a teacher licensing program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New York, NY.
Page, E.B., & Petersen N.S. (1995). The computer moves into essay grading: Updating the ancient test. Phi Delta Kappa, 76, 561–565.
Parshall, C. G. (1999, February). Audio CBTs: Measuring more through the use of speech and non-speech sound. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Montreal, Canada.
Parshall, C. G., Balizet, S., & Treder, D. W. (1998, July). Using an audio computer-bastd progress exam to test the listening skills of non-native speakers. Paper presented at the Simposio Sobre Tecnologias Educativas: Enseñanza para el Siglo XXI (Symposium on Educational Technology: Teaching for the 21st Century), Mèrida, Venezuela.
Parshall, C. G., Stewart, R, & Ritter, J. (1996, April). Innovations: Sound, graphics, and alternative response modes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New York.
Perlman, M., Berger, K., & Tyler, L. (1993). An application of multimedia software to standardized testing in music. (Research Rep. No. 93-36) Princeton, NJ: EducationalTesting Service.
Shavelson, R. J., Baxter, G. P., & Pine, J. (1992). Performance assessments: Political rhetoric and measurement reality. Educational Researcher, 21, 22–27.
Shea, J. A., Norcini, J. J., Baranowski, R. A., Langdon, L. O., & Popp, R. L. (1992). A comparison of video and print formats in the assessment of skill in interpreting cardiovascular motion studies. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 15, 325–340.
Stone, B. (1998, March). Focus on technology: Are you talking to me? Newsweek, 85–86.
Taggart, W. R. (1995). Certifying pilots: Implications for medicine and for the future. In E. L. Mancall & P. G. Bashook (Eds.), Assessing clinical reasoning: The oral examination and alternative methods (pp. 175–182). Evanston, IL: American Board of Medical Specialties.
Vicino, F. L., & Moreno, K. E. (1997). Human factors in the CAT system: A pilot study. In W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, & J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 157–160). Washington, DC: APA.
Vispoel, W. P., & Coffman, D. (1992). Computerized adaptive testing of music-related skills. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 112, 29–49.
Vispoel, W. P., Wang, T., & Bleiler, T. (1997). Computerized adaptive and fixed-item testing of music listening skill: A comparison of efficiency, precision, and concurrent validity. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 43–63.
Williams, V. S. L., Sweeny, S. F., & Bethke, A. D. (1999, April). The development and cognitive laboratory evaluation of an audio-assisted computer-adaptive test for eight-grade mathematics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Montreal, Canada.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Parshall, C.G., Davey, T., Pashley, P.J. (2000). Innovative Item Types for Computerized Testing. In: van der Linden, W.J., Glas, G.A. (eds) Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47531-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47531-6_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-6425-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47531-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive