Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Learning Electromagnetism with Visualizations and Active Learning

  • Chapter
Visualization in Science Education

Part of the book series: Models and Modeling in Science Education ((MMSE,volume 1))

Abstract

This chapter describes learning electromagnetism with visualizations and focuses on the value of concrete and visual representations in teaching abstract concepts. We start with a theoretical background consisting of three subsections: visualization in science, simulations and microcomputerbased laboratory, and studies that investigated the effectiveness of simulations and real-time graphing in physics. We then present the TEAL (Technology Enabled Active Learning) project for MIT’s introductory electromagnetism course as a case in point. We demonstrate the various types of visualizations and how they are used in the TEAL classroom. A description of a large-scale study at MIT follows. In this study, we investigated the effects of introducing 2D and 3D visualizations into an active learning setting on learning outcomes in both the cognitive and affective domains. We conclude by describing an example of TEAL classroom discourse, which demonstrates the effects and benefits of the TEAL project in general, and the active learning and visualizations in particular.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • AAAS (1989). Science for All American. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adamson, G., Nakhleh, M.B. & Zimmerman, J. A (1997). Computer-interfaced O2 Probe: Instrumentation for undergraduate chemistry laboratories. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 16(4), 513–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnea, N. & Dori, Y.J. (2000). Computerized molecular modeling the new technology for enhancing model perception among chemistry educators and learners. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 1(1), 109–120. http://www.uoi.gr/conf_sem/cerapie/2000_January/pdf/16barneaf.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Beichner, R.J. (1989). The effect of simultaneous motion presentation and graph generation in a kinematics lab. Dissertation Abstracts International, 50, 06A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beichner, R.J. et al. (2002). Scale-Up Project. www.ncsu.edu/per/scaleup.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Beichner, R., Bernold, L., Burnsiton, E., Dali, P., Gastineau, J., Gjertsen, M. & Risley, J. (1999). Case study of the physics component of an integrated curriculum. Phys. Educ. Res., Am. J. Phys. Suppl., 67, 16–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belcher, J.W. (2001). Studio Physics at MIT. MIT Physics Annual. http://evangelion.mit.edu/802teal3d/visualizations/resources/PhysicsNewsLetter.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Belcher, J W. & Bessette, R. M. (2001). Using 3D animation in teaching introductory electromagnetism. Computer Graphics 35, 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belcher, J. W. & Olbert, S. (2003). Field line motion in classical electromagnetism. The American Journal of Physics 71, 220–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B. J., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (2000). Creating usable innovations in systemic reform: Scaling up technology-embedded project-based science in urban schools. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonham, S.W., Deardorff D.L. & Beichner, R.J. (2003). Comparison of student performance using web and paper-based homework in college-level physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 1050–1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulter, C. J. & Gilbert, J. K. (2000). Challenges and opportunities of developing models in science education. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing Models in Science Education (pp. 343–362). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brasell, H. (1987). The effect of real time laboratory graphing on learning graphic representation of distance and velocity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 385–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brungardt, J.B. & Zollman, D. (1995). Influence of interactive videodisc instruction using simultaneoustime analysis on Kinematics graphing skills of high school physics students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 855–869.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadmus, R.R. Jr. (1990). A video technique to facilitate the visualization of physical phenomena. American Journal of Physics, 58(4), 397–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsen, D.D., & Andre, T. (1992). Use of microcomputer simulation and conceptual change text to overcome students’ preconceptions about electric circuits. Journal of Computer-based Instruction, 19, 105–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chabay, R. (2002). Electric & Magnetic Interactions: The Movies. Available: http://www4.ncsu.edu/%7Erwchabay/emimovies/

    Google Scholar 

  • Chabay, R. & Sherwood, B. (2002). Matter & Interactions, Vol. II: Electric & Magnetic Interactions, New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M.T.H., Feltovich, P.J. & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, A.J, Belloni, M., Dancy, M. & Christian, W. (2003). Physlets in introductory physics. Physics Education, 38(5), 433–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, K., Marx, J., Thornton, R. & Kuhi, D. (1999). Evaluating innovation in studio physics. Phys. Educ. Res., Am. J. Phys. Suppl., 67, 38–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, T., Martin, E., Zamarro, J.M., Esquembre, F., Swaak, J. & van Joolingen, W. R. (1999). The integrating of computer simulation and learning support: An example from the physics domain of collisions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 597–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dori, Y.J., Barak, M. & Adir, N. (2003). A Web-based chemistry course as a means to foster freshmen learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 80, 1084–1092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dori, Y.J. & Belcher, J.W. (2004). How does technology-enabled active learning affect students’ understanding of scientific concepts? Accepted to The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dori, Y.J., Belcher, J.W., Bessette, M., Danziger, M., McKinney, A. & Hult, E. (2003). Technology for active learning. Materials Today, 6(12), 44–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dori, Y.J., Sasson, I. Kaberman, Z. & Herscovitz, O. (2004). Integrating case-based computerized laboratories into high school chemistry. The Chemical Educator, 9, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J.W. & Barbanel, J. (2000). One model for an integrated math / physics course focusing on electricity and magnetism and related calculus topics” American Journal of Physics, 68(8), 749–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunham, P.H. & Osborne, A. (1991). Learning how to see: Students’ graphing difficulties. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 13(4), 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escalada, L.T., Grabhorn, R. & Zollman, D.A. (1996). Applications of interactive digital video in a physics classroom, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 5(1), 73–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escalada, L.T., Rebello, N.S. & Zollman, D.A. (2004). Students’ explorations of quantum effects in LEDs and luminescent devices, The Physics Teacher, 42, 173–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escalanda, L.T. & Zollman, D.A. (1997). An investigation on the effects of using interactive digital video in a physics classroom on student learning and attitudes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 467–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eylon B., Ronen M. and Ganiel U. (1996). Computer simulations as a tool for teaching and learning: Using a simulation environment in optics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 5(2), 93–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, J.R., White, B.Y. & Gutwill, J. (1999). Dynamic mental models in learning science: The importance of constructing derivational linkages among models. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 806–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. K., & Boulter, C. J. (Eds.). (2000). Developing Models in Science Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, F.M. & Anderson, J.H. (1989). Student difficulties with graphical representations of negative values of velocity. The Physics Teacher, 4, 254–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hake, R.R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-students-survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, 67–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P., Chang, A., DeHaan, R., Gentile, J., Lauffer, S., Strwart, J., Tilghman, S. & Wood, W. (2004). “Scientific Teaching”, Science Magazine, 304, 521–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hestenes, D. (2003). Oersted Medal Lecture 2002: Reforming the mathematical language of physics. American Journal of Physics, 71(2), 104–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, M. J. (2004). Cognitive visualizations and the design of learning technologies. International Journal of Learning Technology, 1, 40–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kown, O.N. (2002). The effect of calculator-based ranger activities on students’ graphing ability. School Science and Mathematics, 102. 57–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R.B., Chin, E., Russell, J., & Marx, N. (2000). The role of representations and tools in the chemistry laboratory and their implications for chemistry learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(3), 105–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krajcik, J.S. (2002). The value and challenges of using learning technologies to support students in learning science. Research in Science Education, 32(4), 411–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapp, D.A. (1999). Using calculator-based laboratory technology: Insights from Research. Proc. ICTMT4-The Fourth International Conference on Technology in Mathematics Teaching, Plymouth, England. http://www.tech.plym.ac.uk/maths/CTMHOME/ictmt4/P40_Lapp.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, J.H. (1983). The role of problem representation in physics. In: Gentner, D. & Stevens, A.L. (Eds). Mental models. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London. Pg. 75–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, J., McDermon, J., Simon, D.P. & Simon, H.A. (1980). Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science, 208, 1334–1342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laws, P.W. (1991). Calculus-based physics without lectures. Physics Today, 44, 24–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K.M., Nicoll, G. & Brooks, D.W. (2004). A comparison of inquiry and worked example Web-based instruction using Physlets. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(1), 81–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M.C. (1998). The impact of technology on science instruction: Historical trends and current opportunities. In: B Fraser & K. Tobin (eds.) International handbook of science education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 265–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, D., O’Kuma, T., Hieggelke C. & Van Heuvelen, A. (2001). Surveying students’ conceptual knowledge of electricity and magnetism. Physics Education Research, American Journal of Physics Suppl. 69(7), S12–S23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Jimenez, P. & Casado, E. (2004). Electros: Development of an educational software for simulation in electrostatic. Computer Application in Engineering Education, 12, 65–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathewson, J.H. (1999). Visual-spatial thinking: An aspects of science overlooked by educators. Science Education, 83, 33–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2002). Cognitive theory and the design of multimedia instruction: An example of the two-way street between cognition and instruction. In D. F. Halpern & M. D. Hakel (Eds.), Applying the science of learning to university teaching and beyond (pp. 55–72). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, A. (1997). Peer Instruction. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, L.C. (1991). Millikan Lecture 1990: What we teach and what is learned — closing the gap. American Journal of Physics, 59, 301–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, L.C., Rosenquist, M.L. & van Zee, E.H. (1987). Student difficulties in connecting graphs and physics: Examples from kinematics. American Journal of Physics, 55(6), 503–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, L.C. & Shaffer, P.S. and the Physics Education Group (2002). Tutorials in Introductory Physics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokros, J.R. & Tinker, R.F. (1987). The impact of microcomputer-based labs on children’s ability to interpret graphs. Journal of Research in ScienceTeaching, 24(4), 369–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakhleh, M. B. & Krajcik, J. S. (1994). Influence of levels of information as presented by different technologies on students’ understanding of acid, base, and pH concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(10), 1077–1096.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, G.M., Patterson, E.T., Gavrin, A.D. & Christian, W. (1999). Just-In-Time Teaching: Blending Active Learning with Web Technology Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC-National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redish, E. F., Saul, J. M. & Steinberg, R. N. (1997). On the effectiveness of active-engagement microcomputer-based laboratories. American Journal of Physics, 65, 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieber, L.P. (2002). Supporting discovery-based learning with simulations. Invited presentation at the International Workshop on Dynamic Visualizations and Learning, Knowledge Media Research Center, Tubingen, Germany, July 18–19. Available: http://www.iwmkmrc.de/workshops/visualization/rieber.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieber, L.P., Boyce, M., & Assad, C. (1990). The effects of computer animation on adult learning and retrieval tasks. Journal of Computer-based Instruction, 17, 46–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieber, L.P., Noah, D. & Nolan, M. (1998, April). Metaphors as graphical representations within open-ended computer-based simulations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieber, L.P., & Parmley, M.W. (1995). To teach or not to teach? Comparing the use of computer-based simulation in deductive versus inductive approaches to learning with adults in science. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14, 359–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(3), 235–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, D.W., Lucas, K.B. & McRobbie, C.J. (2004). Role of the Microcomputer-based Laboratory display in supporting the construction of new understanding in thermal physics. Journal of Research in Science Education, 41, 165–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J.S. (1987). The computer as lab partner: Classroom experience gleaned from one year use of microcomputer-based laboratory. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 15, 225–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, R.N. (2000). Computers in teaching science: To simulate or not to simulate? American Association of Physics Teachers, 68, S37–S41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suwa, M. & Tversky, B. (2002). How do designers shift their focus of attention in their own sketches? In: Anderson, M., Meyer, B. & Olivier, P. (eds.) Diagrammatic Representation and Reasoning, 241–254, Springer Verlag, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadoski, M. & Paivio, A. (2001). Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokoloff, D.R., Thornton, R.K. & Laws, P.W. (1999). Real Time Physics Active Learning Laboratories. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, R.K. & Sokoloff, D.R. (1990). Learning motion concepts using real-time microcomputer-based laboratory tools. American Journal of Physics, 58, 858–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treagust, D. F., Harrison, A. G., Venville, G. J., & Dagher, Z. (1996). Using an analogical teaching approach to engender conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 18(2), 213–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trumper, R. & Gelbman, M. (2000). Investigating electromagnetic induction through a microcomputer based laboratory. Physics Education, 35, 90–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, B.Y. (1993). ThinkeTools: Casual models, conceptual change, and science education. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 1–100.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Education in Technology & Science, Technion, Israel Institute of technology, Haifa, 32000, Israel

    Yehudit Judy Dori

  2. Center for Educational Computing Initiatives, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA

    Yehudit Judy Dori & John Belcher

  3. Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA

    John Belcher

Authors
  1. Yehudit Judy Dori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John Belcher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Reading, UK

    John K. Gilbert

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dori, Y.J., Belcher, J. (2005). Learning Electromagnetism with Visualizations and Active Learning. In: Gilbert, J.K. (eds) Visualization in Science Education. Models and Modeling in Science Education, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3613-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation