Skip to main content

A Comparative Analysis of Three Modes of Collaborative Learning in Fisheries Governance: Hierarchy, Networks and Community

  • Chapter
Participation in Fisheries Governance

Abstract

This chapter discusses three different ways of using collaborative learning in fisheries governance, all of which have been applied in the Coasts Under Stress (CUS) project in Canada. The three modes are: hierarchy; networks; and community. The hierarchical mode entails top-down computer modelling techniques, in which the experiential knowledge that is gathered from fishers’ haul data is integrated with scientists’ survey data into management plans. The networks mode entails developing an understanding of complex marine ecosystems by sharing knowledge between individuals and groups interacting in discussions about ecosystem structures and recovery strategies. The community mode entails the involvement of local communities in knowledge sharing. Our finding is that, in whatever mode it occurs, collaborative learning is of inestimable value in improving fisheries governance, especially by removing mutual misunderstandings. But techniques of collaborative learning cost time and money, and governments must be willing to devote the necessary resources to make them work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ainsworth, C, Heymans, J, Pitcher, T and Vasconcellos, M (2002) ‘Ecosystem models of northern British Columbia for the time periods 2000, 1950, 1900 and 1750’ Fisheries Center Research Reports 10(4):41pp, Vancouver BC, University of British Columbia Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth, C and Pitcher, T (2004) ‘Back to the future in Northern BC: Evaluating historic goals for restoration’, presented at the 4thth World Fisheries Congress, American Fisheries Society, 2–6 May

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth, CH and Sumaila, UR (2003) ‘Intergenerational discounting and the conservation of fisheries resources: a case study in Canadian Atlantic cod’ Fisheries Center Research Reports 11(3):26–33, Vancouver BC, University of British Columbia Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C and Schön, DA (1974) Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C and Schön, DA (1978) Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Reading Massachusetts, Addison-Wesley

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, K (2003) Potential Sites for Marine Protected Areas in Canada’s North Atlantic, MES Thesis, Department of Environmental Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland and Labrador, St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartunek, J and Moch, M (1987) ‘First-order, second-order, and third-order change and organizational development interventions: a cognitive approach’ Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 23:483–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F (1996) ‘Social systems, ecological systems, and property rights’ in S Hanna, C Folke, and KG Maler (eds) Rights to Nature, Washington DC, Island Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouder, F (2002) Improving Policy Coherence and Integration for Sustainable Development: A Checklist, Paris, OECD Policy Brief

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H (2000) Formal Knowledge Networks: A Study of Canadian Experiences, Winnipeg, International Institute for Sustainable Development

    Google Scholar 

  • Creech, H (2001) Form Follows Function: Management and Governance of a Knowledge Network, Winnipeg, International Institute for Sustainable Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • DFO manager (2004) Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, personal communication

    Google Scholar 

  • Environment Canada (1999) ‘The New World of environment policy making: theory and practice’ presented the ESAC Annual Meeting, Sherbrooke, Quebec

    Google Scholar 

  • FRB [Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City], OECD [Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development], Rural Policy Research Institute and The Countryside Agency (2004) International Conference on New Approaches to Rural Policy: Lessons from Around the World, Washington DC, 25–26 March

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersick, CJG (1991) ‘Revolutionary change theories: a multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm’ Academy of Management Review 16:10–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J, Haedrich, R, Kennedy, J, Vodden, K and Wernerheim, M (forthcoming) ‘Barriers and diversions to knowledge flow’ in J Lutz and B Neis (eds) Making and Moving Knowledge, Montreal, McGill-Queen’s Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggan, N (2000) ‘Back to the future and creative justice: recalling and restoring forgotten abundance in Canada’s marine ecosystems’ in H Coward, R Ommer and T Pitcher (eds) Just Fish: Ethics in the Canadian Coastal Fisheries, St. Johns Newfoundland, ISER Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggan, N (2004) personal communication

    Google Scholar 

  • Heymans, JJ and Pitcher, TJ (2002) ‘A model of the marine ecosystem of Newfoundland and Southern Labrador (2J3KLNO) in the time periods 1985–1987 and 1995–1997’ Fisheries Center Research Reports, 10(5):5–43, Vancouver BC, University of British Columbia Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, GP (1991) ‘Organizational learning: the contributing process and the literatures’ Organizational Science 2:88–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, J, Walters, C and Haedrich, R (1997) ‘Is scientific inquiry incompatible with government information control?’ Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54:1998–1210

    Google Scholar 

  • IBEC [Indian Bay Ecosystem Corporation] (2003) Phase I Feasibility Study, Indian Bay, Newfoundland, Indian Bay, NL Centre for Terrestrial and Aquatic Field Studies

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J (1992) Notes on the Theory of the Actor Network: Ordering, Strategy and Heterogeneity, Lancaster University Centre for Science Studies, Cartmel College

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippard, L (1997) The Lure of the Local: Sense of Place in a Multi-centred Society, New York, The New York Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowndes V and Wilson, D (2001) ‘Social capital and local governance: exploring the institutional design variable’ Political Studies 49:629–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, B, Hollis, T, Roach, C, Blanchard, K, Chaurette E and Bavington, D (forthcoming) ‘Knowledge flows, conservation values and municipal wetlands stewardship’, in J Lutz and B Neis (eds) Making and Moving Knowledge, Montreal, McGill-Queen’s Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D (2001) ‘The lure of the local: landscape studies at the end of a troubled century’ Progress in Human Geography 25(2):269–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ommer, R, Coward, H and Parrish, C (forthcoming) ‘Knowledge, uncertainty and wisdom’ in J Lutz and B Neis (eds) Making and Moving Knowledge, Montreal, McGill-Queen’s Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ommer, R and Sinclair, P (forthcoming) ‘Introduction’ in R Ommer and P Sinclair (eds) Power, Agency and Nature: Shaping Coastal Society and Environment, St. John’s Newfoundland, ISER Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, D, Christensen, V, Dalsgaard, J, Froese, R and Torres, FJR (1998) ‘Fishing down marine food webs’ Science 279:860–863

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, S and Orsini, M (2002) Mapping the Links: Citizen Involvement in Policy Processes, Ottawa, Canadian Policy Research Network Discussion Paper No. F21

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkerton, E and Weinstein, M (1995) Fisheries That Work: Sustainability Through Community-based Management, a Report to the David Suzuki Foundation, Vancouver BC, David Suzuki Foundation

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, W (1997) ‘Rebuilding trouters’ heaven’ Newfoundland Sportsman 7(4-July/August):26–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, G (1993) Feminism and Geography: the Limits of Geographical Knowledge, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, London, Temple Smith

    Google Scholar 

  • Seamon, D (2004) ‘Grasping the dynamism of urban place: contributions from the work of Christopher Alexander, Bill Hillier, and Daniel Kemmis’ in T Mels (ed) Reanimating Places: a Geography of Rhythms, London, Ashgate

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, MK (2001) ‘Donald Schön: learning, reflection and change’ Encyclopedia of Informal Education, [online]

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenmark, M (2002) Environmental Ethics and Policy Making, Aldershot, Ashgate

    Google Scholar 

  • UBC Fisheries Center (2004) Back to the Future webpage www.fisheries.ubc.ca/projects/btf/

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Zyll de Jong, M, Lester, N, Korver, R, Norris, W, and Wicks, B (2002) ‘Managing the exploitation of brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis (Mitchill), populations in Newfoundland lakes’ in IG Cowx (ed) Ecology and Management of Lake and Reservoir Fisheries, Oxford, Fishing News Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Vodden, K and Bannister, K (forthcoming) ‘Circularising knowledge flows: institutional structures, policies and practices for community-university partnerships’, in J Lutz and B Neis (eds) Making and Moving Knowledge, Montreal, McGill-Queen’s Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Vodden, K (2004) ‘Watershed management in Canada: lessons and implications for institutional design’, paper presented to the United Nations Environment Programme Hilltops to Oceans Partnership Conference, Cairns, Australia, May

    Google Scholar 

  • Vodden, K (1999) N a nwa k ola: Co-management and Sustainable Community Economic Development in a British Columbia Fishing Village, Master’s Thesis, Department of Geography, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, L (2000) Patterns of Equivocality in Decision Making for Marine and Terrestrial Ecosystems: Towards the Design of Equivocality-Reducing Management Systems, PhD Dissertation, Simon Fraser University School of Resource and Environmental Management, Burnaby, British Columbia

    Google Scholar 

  • Yorque, R, Walker, B, Holling, CS, Gunderson, LH, Folke, C, Carpenter, S and Brock, W (2002) ‘Toward an integrative synthesis’ in LH Gunderson and CS Holling (eds) Panarchy: Understanding Transformation in Human and Natural Systems, Washington, Island Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vodden, K., Ommer, R., Schneider, D. (2005). A Comparative Analysis of Three Modes of Collaborative Learning in Fisheries Governance: Hierarchy, Networks and Community. In: Gray, T.S. (eds) Participation in Fisheries Governance. Reviews: Methods and Technologies in Fish Biology and Fisheries, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3778-3_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics