Skip to main content

Innovations in Planning for School Improvement: Problems and Potential

  • Chapter

Abstract

Mike Wallace’s purposes in this chapter are twofold: to examine the key factors influencing the design and implementation of school self evaluation and school development planning through a seletive historical account focusing on major initiatives originating outside schools; and to argue that these kinds of innovation embody intrinsic contradictions that are incapable of resolution, yet must be addressed by initiators if they are to maximise the potenial for promoting school improvement rather than contributing to the problems that inhibit it. The chapter is divided into six sections. First, concepts framing the analysis are outlined. Second, major forms taken by school self evaluation and its implementation are summarised. Third, the origin and design of school development planning are explored, with reference to the lessons learned from experience with school self evaluation. Fourth, early implementation of this innovation is examined. Fifth, development planning is located within the broader frame of planning for change in a rapidly evolving context significantly affecting implementation. Finally, three contradictions emerging from the account are highlighted and the need is suggested for a more sophisticated way of thinking about innovations in planning for school improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arnott, M. Bullock, A., & Thomas, H. (1992). The impact of local management on schools: A source book first report of the impact project. Birmingham: University of Birmingham School of Education for the National Association of Headteachers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. (1978). Federal programs supporting educational change: Implementing and sustaining innovations (Vol VIII). Santa Monica, Ca: Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolam, R. (1975). The management of educational change: Towards a conceptual framework. In V. Houghton, R. McHugh, & C. Morgan (Eds.), Management in education. London: Ward Lock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolam, R. (1982a). Strategies for school improvement report for the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Bristol: University of Bristol School of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolam, R. (Ed.). (1982b). School focused in-service training. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford Education. (1992). School development planning handbook. Bradford: Bradford Education Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, B., & Spinks, J. (1988). The self managing school. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clift, P., Nuttall, D., & McCormick, R. (Eds). (1987). Studies in school self evaluation. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constable, H., Norton, X, & Abbott, I. (1991). Case studies in school development planning. Sunderland: Centre for Post Experience and Research, Sunderland Polytechnic School of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuttance, P. (1994). The contribution of quality assurance reviews to development in school systems. In D. Hargreaves & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Development Planning for School Improvement. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B., & Ellison, L. (1992). School development planning. Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Science. (1989). Planning for school improvement. London: DES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Science. (1991). Development planning: A practical guide. London: DES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enfield. (1985). Curriculum initiatives group: Supporting institutional development. Mimeo: London Borough of Enfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. with Stiegelbauer, S. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M., Anderson, S., & Newton, E. (1986). Support systems for implementing curriculum in school boards. Toronto: OISE Press and Ontario Government Bookstore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D. (1990). Accountability and school improvement in the work of LEA inspectorates. Journal of Education Policy, 5(3), 230–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D., & Hopkins, D. (1991). The empowered school. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D, Hopkins, D., & Leask, M. (1990). The management of development planning — A paper for local education authorities. London: DES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, D. (1985). School based review for school improvement: A preliminary state of the art. Leuven, Belgium: ACCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, D. (1989). Evaluation for school development. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inner London Education Authority. (1977). Keeping the school under review. London: ILEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inner London Education Authority. (1984). Improving secondary schools. London: ILEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inner London Education Authority. (1985). Improving primary schools. London: ILEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keys, W., & Fernandes, C. (1990). A survey of school governing bodies (2 Vols.). Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K., & Miles, M. (1990). Improving the urban high school: What works and why. Columbia, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGilchrist, B., Mortimore, P., Savage, J., & Beresford, C. (1995). Planning matters: The impact of development planning in primary schools. London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, L., & Elmore, R. (1991). Getting the job done: Alternative policy instruments. In Odden, R. (Ed.), Education policy implementation. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, A., Bolam, R., Abbott, R., & Holly, P. (1984a). Guidelines for review and internal development in schools: Primary school handbook. York: Longman for Schools Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, A., Bolam, R., Abbott, R., & Holly, P. (1984b). Guidelines for review and internal development in schools: Secondary school handbook. York: Longman for Schools Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning. London: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuttall, D. (1981). School self evaluation: Accountability with a human face? London: Schools Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for Standards in Education. (1994). Improving schools. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for Standards in Education. (1996a). Making the most of inspection: A Guide to inspection for schools and governors. London: Ofsted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for Standards in Education. (1996b). Consultation on the arrangements for the inspection of maintained schools from September 1997. London: Ofsted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, X, Purkey, S., & Parker, X (1986). Productive school systems for a nonrational world. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheffield Education Department. (1991). School development planning under LMS. Sheffield: Sheffield City Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skelton, M., Reeves, G., & Playfoot, D. (1991). Development planning for primary schools. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solihull Education Committee. (1980). Evaluating the primary school — A guide for primary schools in the Metropolitan Borough of Solihull. Solihull: Solihull Education Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M. (1991a). Coping with multiple innovations in schools. School Organisation, 11(2), 187–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M. (1991b). Contradictory interests in policy implementation: The case of LEA development plans for schools. Journal of Education Policy, 6(4), 385–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M. (1992). Flexible planning: a key to the management of multiple innovations. In N. Bennett, M. Crawford, & C. Riches (Eds.), Managing change in education: Individual and institutional perspectives. London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M. (1996). Policy interaction and policy implementation. Educational Management and Administration, 24(3), 263–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M., & McMahon, A. (1994). Planning for change in turbulent times: The case of multiracial primary schools. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwickshire County Council. (1991). PRIDE (Process for the Review and Internal Development of Education) in our Schools: An Aid to Development Planning. Warwick: WCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston, P., Barrett, E., & Jamison, J. (1992). The quest for coherence: Managing the whole curriculum 5–16. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, A. (1983). Why education policies often fail: The huperrationalisation hypothesis. In V. Baldridge, & T. Deal, (Eds.), The dynamics of organisational change in education. Berkeley, Ca: McCutchan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wallace, M. (2005). Innovations in Planning for School Improvement: Problems and Potential. In: Hopkins, D. (eds) The Practice and Theory of School Improvement. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4452-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics