Skip to main content

Combining Intention-Oriented and State-Based Process Modeling

  • Conference paper
Conceptual Modeling – ER 2005 (ER 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 3716))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Business process modeling and design has gained importance in recent years. Consequently, a large number of modeling languages have emerged. Many of them lack formality, whereas some others support the verification of the designed process. Most of existing modeling languages adopt an operational view focusing on how the process is performed. By contrast, others follow the human intention of achieving a goal as the force that drives the process, and concentrate on what the process must do, i.e. on its rationale. The aim of this paper is to combine intention-oriented modeling with formal state-based modeling and achieve their synergy, benefiting from the advantages of both. We use the Map formalism as an example of the former and the Generic Process Model (GPM) as an example of the latter. The paper proposes a procedure for converting a Map into GPM concepts, illustrates it with the SAP Material Management Module and shows the benefits resulting from it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ASAP World Consultancy and J. Blain et al, Using SAP R/3. Prentice Hall of India (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bider, I., Johannesson, P., Perjons, E.: Goal-Oriented Patterns for Business Processes. Position paper for Workshop on Goal-Oriented Business Process Modeling, GBPM 2002 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bunge, M.: Treatise on Basic Philosophy: Ontology I: The Furniture of the World, vol. 3. Reidel, Boston (1977)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bunge, M.: Treatise on Basic Philosophy: Ontology II: A World of Systems, vol. 4. Reidel, Boston (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Dietz, J.L.G.: Basic Notions Regarding Business Processes and Supporting Information Systems. In: Proceedings of BPMDS 2004, CAiSE 2004 Workshops Proceedings, Latvia, Riga, vol. 2, pp. 160–168 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hammer, M., Champy, J.: Reengineering the Corporation – A manifesto for Business Revolution. Nicholas Brealey Publishing, London (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ould, M.A.: Business Processes: Modeling and Analysis for Reengineering and Improvement. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Paulson, D., Wand, Y.: An Automated Approach to Information Systems Decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 18(3), 174–189 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rolland, C., Prakash, N., Benjamen, A.: A Multi-Model View of Process Modelling. Requirements Engineering Journal 4(4), 169–187 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rolland, C., Prakash, N.: Bridging the gap between Organizational needs and ERP functionality. Requirements Engineering Journal 5 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Salinesi, C., Rolland, C.: Fitting Business Models to Software Functionality: Exploring the Fitness Relationship. In: Eder, J., Missikoff, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2003. LNCS, vol. 2681. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Soffer, P., Wand, Y.: On the Notion of Soft Goals in Business Process Modeling. Business Process Management Journal (2003) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Soffer, P., Wand, Y.: Goal-driven Analysis of Process Model Validity. In: Persson, A., Stirna, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3084, pp. 521–535. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Wand, Y., Weber, R.: An Ontological Model of an Information System. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 16(11), 1282–1292 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yu, E., Mylopoulos, J.: Using Goals, Rules, and Methods to Support Reasoning in Business Process Reengineering. International Journal of Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management 5, 1–13 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Soffer, P., Rolland, C. (2005). Combining Intention-Oriented and State-Based Process Modeling. In: Delcambre, L., Kop, C., Mayr, H.C., Mylopoulos, J., Pastor, O. (eds) Conceptual Modeling – ER 2005. ER 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3716. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11568322_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11568322_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-29389-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32068-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics