Skip to main content

Adaptive Query-Based Sampling of Distributed Collections

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4209))

Abstract

As part of a Distributed Information Retrieval system a description of each remote information resource, archive or repository is usually stored centrally in order to facilitate resource selection. The acquisition of precise resource descriptions is therefore an important phase in Distributed Information Retrieval, as the quality of such representations will impact on selection accuracy, and ultimately retrieval performance. While Query-Based Sampling is currently used for content discovery of uncooperative resources, the application of this technique is dependent upon heuristic guidelines to determine when a sufficiently accurate representation of each remote resource has been obtained. In this paper we address this shortcoming by using the Predictive Likelihood to provide both an indication of the quality of an acquired resource description estimate, and when a sufficiently good representation of a resource has been obtained during Query-Based Sampling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Azzopardi, L., Girolami, M., Risjbergen, C.J.: Investigating the relationship between language model perplexity and IR precision-recall measures. In: Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGIR conference, pp. 369–370 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baeza-Yates, R.: Applications of web query mining. In: Losada, D.E., Fernández-Luna, J.M. (eds.) ECIR 2005. LNCS, vol. 3408, pp. 7–22. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Baillie, M., Azzopardi, L., Crestani, F.: Towards better measures: Evaluation of estimated resource description quality for distributed IR. In: First International Conference on Scalable Information Systems. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Belkin, N.J., Croft, W.B.: Information filtering and information retrieval: two sides of the same coin. Communications of the ACM 35(12), 29–38 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Buckley, C., Voorhees, E.M.: Evaluating evaluation measure stability. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGIR conference, pp. 33–40 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Callan, J.P.: Advances in information retrieval. In: chapter Distributed information retrieval, pp. 127–150. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Callan, J.P., Connell, M.: Query-based sampling of text databases. ACM Transactions of Information Systems 19(2), 97–130 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Degroot, M.H.: Optimal Statistical Decisions (Wiley Classics Library). Wiley-Interscience, Chichester (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E., Stork, D.G.: Pattern Classification. Wiley-Interscience Publication, Chichester (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hofmann, T.: Unsupervised learning by probabilistic latent semantic analysis. Machine Learning 42(1-2), 177–196 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Ipeirotis, P.G., Gravano, L.: When one sample is not enough: improving text database selection using shrinkage. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD Conference, pp. 767–778 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kullback, S.: Information theoery and statistics. Wiley, New York (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shokouhi, M., Scholer, F., Zobel, J.: Sample sizes for query probing in uncooperative distributed information retrieval. In: Zhou, X., Li, J., Shen, H.T., Kitsuregawa, M., Zhang, Y. (eds.) APWeb 2006. LNCS, vol. 3841, pp. 63–75. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Si, L., Callan, J.P.: Modeling search engine effectiveness for federated search. In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGIR Conference, pp. 83–90 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Xu, J., Croft, W.B.: Cluster-based language models for distributed retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGIR conference, pp. 254–261 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhai, C., Lafferty, J.: A study of smoothing methods for language models applied to information retrieval. ACM Transaction of Information Systems 22(2), 179–214 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Baillie, M., Azzopardi, L., Crestani, F. (2006). Adaptive Query-Based Sampling of Distributed Collections. In: Crestani, F., Ferragina, P., Sanderson, M. (eds) String Processing and Information Retrieval. SPIRE 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4209. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11880561_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11880561_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-45774-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45775-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics