Skip to main content

Seeing Biological Motion - Is There a Role for Cognitive Strategies?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Gesture-Based Communication in Human-Computer Interaction (GW 1999)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1739))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to suggest components of a model for the processing of human movement information introducing the concept of ‘motion integrators’. Two approaches to the perception of biological motion are contrasted: the low-level and the high-level processing approach. It is suggested that conceptually-driven processes play a prominent role in motion recognition. Examples from experimental psychology and neurobiology are discussed. Our quasi-automatic perception of biological motion seems to involve resource-dependent cognitive processes and an ‘interactive-encoding’ hypothesis is elaborated further. In particular, the role of attentional mechanisms and the influence of concept use are highlighted. Finally, recent findings are interpreted in connection to specific encoding strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Johansson, G.: Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Percept. Psychophys. 14, 1973, 201–211

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dittrich, W.H.: Action categories and the perception of biological motion. Perception 22 (1993) 15–22

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Royden, C.S., Hildreth, E.C.: Human heading judgments in the presence of moving objects. Percept. Psychophys. 58 (1996) 836–856

    Google Scholar 

  4. McLeod, P., Dienes, Z.: Do fielders know where to go to catch the ball or only how to get there? J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. 22 (1996) 531–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Koenderink, J. J.: Optic flow. Vision Res. 26 (1986) 161–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hengstenberg, R.: Visual processing: How to know where to go. Nature 392 (1998) 231–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Reichardt, W.: Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system, In: Rosenblith, W.A. (Ed.) Sensory communication. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1961) 303–317

    Google Scholar 

  8. Adelson, E.H., Bergen, J.R.: Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. J. Opt. Soc. Amer. A2 (1985) 284–299

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ullman, S.: The interpretation of visual motion. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shimojo, S., Silverman, G.H., Nakayama, K.: Occlusion and the solution to the aperture problem formotion. Vision Res. 29 (1989) 619–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Adelson, E.H., Movshon, J.A.: Phenomenal coherence of moving gratings. Nature 300 (1982) 523–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nawrot, M., Sekuler, R.: Assimilation and contrast in motion perception: explorations in cooperativity. Vision Res. 30 (1990) 1439–1451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. McLeod, P., Driver, J., Crisp, J.: Visual-search for a conjunction of movement and form is parallel. Nature 332 (1988) 154–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stoner, G.R., Albright, T.D., Ramachandran, V.S.: Transparency and coherence in human motion perception. Nature 344 (1990) 153–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Braunstein, M.L.: Depth perception in rotating dot patterns: Effects of numerosity and perspective. J. Exp. Psychol. 64 (1962) 415–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schiller, P.H.: The central visual system. Vision Res. 26 (1986) 1351–1389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sparks, D.L.: Translation of sensory signals into commands for control of saccadic eye-movements-Role of primate superior colliculus. Physiol. Rev. 66 (1986) 118–171

    Google Scholar 

  18. Michotte, A.: The perception of causality. Methuen, Andover (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hemeren, P. E.: Typicality and Context Effects in Action Categories. In: Shafto, M.G., Langley, P. (eds.): Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum (1997) 949

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ille, A., Cadopi, M.: Reproducing choreographic walks from the observation of a kinematic point-light display: Effect of skill level. J. Human Movem. Stud. 29 (1995) 101–114

    Google Scholar 

  21. Runeson, S., Frykholm, G.: Visual perception of lifted weight. J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Perc. Perform. 13 (1981) 733–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bingham, G.P.: Kinematic form and scaling: Further investigations on the visual perception of lifted weight. J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Perc. Perform. 13 (1987) 155–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dittrich, W.H.: Facial motion and the recognition of emotions. Psycholog. Beitr. 33 (1991) 366–377

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dittrich, W.H., Troscianko, T., Lea, S.E.G., Morgan, D.: Perception of emotion from dynamic point-light displays represented in dance. Perception 25 (1996) 727–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Poizner, H., Bellugi, U., Lutes-Driscoll, V.: Perception of American Sign Language in dynamic point-light displays. J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. 7 (1981) 430–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dittrich, W.H., Lea, S.E.G.: Visual perception of intentional motion. Perception 23 (1994) 253–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lea, S.E.G., Dittrich, W.H.: What do birds see in moving video images? Curr. Psychol. Cognit. 18 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Johansson, G.: Spatio-temporal differentiation and integration in visual motion perception. Psychol. Res. 38 (1976) 379–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fox, R., McDaniel, C.: The perception of biological motion by human infants. Science 218 (1982) 486–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mather, G., Radford, K., West, S.: Low-level processing of biological motion. Proc. Roy. Soc. Ldn B249 (1992) 149–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Stranger, J., Hommel, B.: The perception of action and movement. In: Prinz, W., Bridgeman, B. (eds.) Handbook of Perception and Action, Vol.1. Academic, London, San Diego (1995) 397–451

    Google Scholar 

  32. Anstis, S.M.: The perception of apparent motion. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Ldn B290 (1980) 153–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Baker, C.L., Braddick, O.J.: Temporal properties of the short-range process in apparent motion. Perception 14 (1985) 181–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Johansson, G., von Hofsten, C., Jansson, G.: Event perception. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 31 (1980) 27–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Shiffrar, M., Freyd, J.J.: Apparent motion of the human body. Psychol. Sci. 1 (1990) 257–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shiffrar, M., Freyd, J.J.: Timing and apparent motion path choice with human-body photographs. Psychol. Sci. 4 (1993) 379–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Thornton, I.M., Pinto, J., Shiffrar, M.: The visual perception of human locomotion. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 15 (1998) 535–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ahlström, V., Blake, R., Ahlström, U.: Perception of biological motion. Perception 26 (1997) 1539–1548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Braddick, O.: A short-range process in apparent motion. Vision Res. 14 (1974) 519–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Gibson, J.J.: The perception of the visual world. Houghton Mifflin, New York (1950)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Nakayama, K.: James J. Gibson–An appreciation. Psychol. Rev. 101 (1994) 329–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Runeson, S., Frykholm, G.: Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person and action perception. J. Exp. Psychol.: General 112 (1983) 585–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Cutting, J.E., Proffitt, D.R., Kozlowski, L.T.: A biomechanical invariant for gait perception. J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Perc. Perform. 4 (1978) 357–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Cutting, J.E., Proffitt, D.R.: Gait perception as an example of how we may perceive events. In:Walk, R.D., Pick, H.L. (eds.) Intersensory Perception and Sensory Integration. Plenum Press, New York (1981) 249–273

    Google Scholar 

  45. Potter, M.: Meaning in visual search. Science 187 (1975) 965–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Schyns, P.G., Oliva, A.: From blobs to boundary edges: Evidence for time-and spatial-scale-dependent scene recognition. Psychol. Sci. 5 (1994) 195–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Sinha, P., Poggio, T.: Role of learning in three-dimensional form perception. Nature 384 (1996) 460–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Cavanagh, P.: Attention-based motion perception. Science 257 (1992) 1563–1565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Cutting, J.E., Moore, C., Morrison, R.: Masking the motions of human gait. Percept. Psychophys. 44 (1988) 339–347

    Google Scholar 

  50. Shiffrar, M., Lichtey, L., Heptulla-Chatterjee, S.: The perception of biological motion across apertures. Percept. Psychophys. 59 (1997) 51–59

    Google Scholar 

  51. Heptulla-Chatterjee, S., Freyd, J., Shiffrar, M.: Configurational processing in the perception of apparent biological motion. J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. 22 (1996) 916–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Hemeren, P. E.: Frequency, ordinal position and semantic distance as measures of cross-cultural stability and hierarchies for action verbs. Acta Psychol. 91 (1996) 39–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Battig, W.F., Montague, W.E.: Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. J. Exp. Psychol. Monographs 80 (1969) 1–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Verfaillie, K., Transsaccadic memory for the egocentric and allocentric position of a biological-motion walker. J.Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Memory Cogn. 23 (1997) 739–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Tulving, E.: Precis of Tulving Elements of Episodic Memory. BBS 2 (1984) 223–238

    Google Scholar 

  56. Hillis, A.E., Caramazza, A.: Cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying visual and semantic processing-Implications from optic aphasia. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 7 (1995) 457–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Riddoch, M.J., Humphreys, G.W.: Visual object processing in a case of optic aphasia: A case of semantic access agnosia. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 4 (1987) 131–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Rumiati, R.I., Humphreys, G.W.: Recognition by action: Dissociating visual and semantic routes to action in normal observers. J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. 24 (1998) 631–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Goodale, M.A., Meanan, J.P, Bulthoff, H.H, Nicolle, D.A., Murphy, K.J., Recicot, C.I.: Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension. Curr. Biol. 4 (1994) 604–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Milner, A.D., Perrett, D.I., Johnston, R.S., Benson, P.J., Jorda, T.R., Heely, D.W., Bettucci, D., Mortara, F., Mutani, R., Terazzi, E., Davidson, D.L.W.: Perception and action in “visual form agnosia”. Brain 114 (1991) 405–428

    Google Scholar 

  61. Viviani, P., Stucchi, N.: Biological movements look uniform: Evidence for motor-percpetual interactions. J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. 18 (1992) 603–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Decety, J., Grezes, J., Costes, N., Perani, D., Jeannerod, M., Procyk, E., Grassi, F, Fazio, F.: Brain activity during observation of actions. Influence of action content and subject’s strategy. Brain 120 (1997) 1763–1777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Grezes, J., Costes, N., Decety, J.: Top-down effect of strategy on the perception of human biological motion: A PET investigation. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 15 (1998) 553–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Damasio, H, Damasio, A.: Impaired recognition of emotioin in facial expressions following bilateral damage to the human amygdala. Nature 372 (1994) 669–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Young, A.W., Aggleton, J.P., Hellawell, D.J., Johnson, M., Broks, P., Hanley, J.R..: Face processing impairments after amygdalotomy. Brain 118 (1995) 15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Bonda, E., Petrides, M., Ostry, D., Evans, A.: Specific involvement of human parietal systems and the amygdala in the perception of biological motion. J. Neurosci. 16 (1996) 3737–3744

    Google Scholar 

  67. Geesaman, B.J., Andersen, R.A.: The analysis of complex motion patterns by form/cue invariant MSTd neurons. J. Neurosci. 16 (1996) 4716–4732

    Google Scholar 

  68. Vaina, L.M., Lemay, M., Bienfang, D.C., Choi, A.Y., Nakayama, K.: Intact “biological motion” and “structure from motion” perception in a patient with impaired motion mechanisms: a case study. Vis. Neurosci. 5 (1990) 353–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. McLeod, P., Dittrich, W., Driver, J., Perrett, D.,& Zihl, J.: Preserved and impaired detection of structure from motion by a “motion-blind” patient. Vis. Cognit. 3 (1996) 363–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Hoffman, D.D., Flinchbaugh, B.E.: The interpretation of biological motion. Biol. Cybern. 42 (1982) 195–204

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  71. Webb, J.A., Aggarwal, J.K.: Structure from motion of rigid and jointed objects. Artific. Intellig. 19 (1982) 107–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Bertenthal, B.I., Pinto, J.: Global processing of biological motion. Psychol. Sci. 5 (1994) 221–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Sumi, S.: Upside-down presentation of the Johansson moving light-spot pattern. Perception 13 (1984) 283–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Verfaillie, K.: Orientation-dependent priming effects in the perception of biological motion. J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. 19 (1993) 992–1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Freyd, J.J., Finke, R.A.: Representational momentum. J. Exp. Psychol: Learn. Mem. Cogn. 10 (1984) 126–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Shiffrar, M., Freyd, J.J.: Timing and apparent motion path choice with human body photographs. Psychol. Sci. 4 (1993) 379–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Cavanagh, P., Mather, G.: Motion: The long and short of it. Spatial Vis. 4 (1989) 103–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Neri, P., Morrone, M.C., Burr, D.C.: Seeing biological motion. Nature 395 (1998) 894–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dittrich, W.H. (1999). Seeing Biological Motion - Is There a Role for Cognitive Strategies?. In: Braffort, A., Gherbi, R., Gibet, S., Teil, D., Richardson, J. (eds) Gesture-Based Communication in Human-Computer Interaction. GW 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1739. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46616-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46616-9_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66935-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46616-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics