Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Old Wine in New Bottles? Does Climate Policy Determine Bilateral Development Aid for Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency?

  • Chapter
International Development Policy: Energy and Development

Part of the book series: International Development Policy ((IDP))

Abstract

Since the UN Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 bilateral and multilateral donors have stressed that development assistance has increasingly been oriented towards climate-friendly interventions. With respect to energy aid, this should lead to a substantial increase in projects related to renewable energy and energy efficiency. Given a new database of hundreds of thousands of bilateral development assistance projects, we can assess whether such a reorientation has indeed taken place. We find that, contrary to expectations, the share of bilaterally-funded renewable energy and energy efficiency projects did not increase over the period from 1980 to 2008. This share fluctuated greatly, following the price of oil, peaking with the second oil crisis of the early 1980s. The impacts of global climate policy treaties are minor or inexistent. ‘Traditional’ renewable energies such as hydro and geothermal declined, while ‘new’ renewables showed two peaks in the early 1980s and late 1990s. Differences between donor countries are huge. Several countries, including climate sceptics such as the US and Australia, but also the UK and Switzerland, saw a consistent decline. The self-proclaimed climate pioneers such as Germany, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden show peaks related to both the oil crises and international climate policy. Only in Austria, Denmark, Finland and Spain can ‘new’ climate mitigation development assistance be found.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 60.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  • AidData (2010) PLAID 1.9: Final Development Release of the PLAID Database, http://www.AidData.org, date accessed 15 February 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Wind Energy Association (1999) Global Wind Energy Market Report (Washington).

    Google Scholar 

  • Amici de la Terra (2008) La Risorsa Geotermica per Usi Elettrici in Italia: Energia, Ambiente e Accettabilita Sociale (Florence).

    Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, K., P. Potolidis, M. Gerber and P. Leimgruber (2008) Comparative Political Dataset I (CPDS I) 1960-2007, University of Bern, http://www.nsd.uib.no/macrodataguide/set.html?id=6&sub=2, date accessed 15 March 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailis, R., A. Cowan, V. Berrueta and O. Masera (2009) ‘Arresting the Killer in the Kitchen: The Promises and Pitfalls of Commercializing Improved Cookstoves’, World Development, 37, pp. 1694-705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertani, R. (2007) ‘World Geothermal Generation in 2007’, GRC Bulletin, September 2007, pp. 8-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanke, A. (2002) ‘Ecological Tax Reform in Germany and Interest Groups’, International Review for Environmental Strategies, 3(1), pp. 81-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabegas, R., J. Martins Carvalho and J.C. Nunes ‘Portugal Country Geothermal Update’, Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2010, pp. 1-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calzada, G. (2009) Study of the Effects on Employment of Public Aid to Renewable Energy Sources, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (Madrid).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappetti, G., G. Passaleva and F. Sabatelli (2000) ‘Italy Country Update Report 1995-99’, Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2000, pp. 109-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre for International Sustainable Development Law (2002) The Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibilities: Origins and Scope (Montreal).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinese Renewable Energy Industries Association (2007) China Wind Power Report 2007 (Beijing: China Environmental Science Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelho, S. and M. Bolognini (1999) ‘Policies to Improve Biomass-Electricity Generation in Brazil’, Renewable Energy, 16, pp. 996-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cusack, T. and L. Engelhardt (2002) The PGL File Collection: File Structures and Procedures, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (WZB), http://www.wzberlin.de/mp/ism/people/misc/cusack/d_sets.en.htm#data, date accessed 2 May 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danish Energy Agency (2001) Danish Energy Sector Exports: Products and Consulting Services 2000 (Copenhagen).

    Google Scholar 

  • Darden Graduate School of Business Administration, University of Virginia (1999) The Volta River Project, UVA-E-0161 (Charlottesville).

    Google Scholar 

  • Energy Information Administration (2010a) Oil Prices, http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/steo/pub/fsheets/petroleumprices.xls, date accessed 30 March 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Energy Information Administration (2010b) World Hydroelectricity Installed Capacity, http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/international/iealf/table64h.xls, date accessed 30 May 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faber, M. (1990) ‘The Volta River Project: For Whom the Smelter Tolled’, in Pickett, J. and H. Singer (eds) Towards Economic Recovery in Sub-Saharan Africa (London: Routledge), pp. 65-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fearnside, P. (2002) ‘Greenhouse Gas Emissions from a Hydroelectric Reservoir (Brazil’s Tucurul Dam) and the Energy Policy Implications’, Water, Air & Soil Pollution, 133, pp. 69-96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geothermal Energy Association (2008) Update on US Geothermal Power Production and Development (Washington).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geothermal Energy Association (2010) Geothermal Energy: International Market Update (Washington).

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Wind Energy Council (2009) Global Installed Wind Power Capacity 2008-2009 (Brussels).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, R., B. Parks, T. Roberts and M. Tierney (2008) Greening Aid? Understanding the Environmental Impact of Development Assistance (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, E. (1987) ‘The Strategy of Production and Distribution of Improved Charcoal Stoves in Kenya’, World Development, 15, pp. 375-86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEA (various years) Trends in Photovoltaic Applications (Paris).

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA and NEA (2005) Projected Costs of Generating Electricity: Update 2005 (Paris).

    Google Scholar 

  • International Geothermal Association (2010) Installed Generating Capacity, http://iga.igg.cnr.it/geoworld/geoworld.php?sub=elgen, date accessed 30 May 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A. and S. Jacobsson (2000) The Emergence of a Growth Industry: A Comparative Analysis of the German, Dutch and Swedish Wind Turbine Industries, http://www.druid.dk/conferences/winter2002/gallery/jacobsson.pdf, date accessed 15 May 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawazoe, S. and J. Combs (2004) ‘Geothermal Japan’, GRC Bulletin, pp. 58-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knill, C., M. Debus and S. Heichel (2010) ‘Do Parties Matter in Internationalised Policy Areas? The Impact of Political Parties on Environmental Policy Outputs in 18 OECD Countries’, European Journal of Political Research, 49(3), pp. 301-36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozloff, K. and O. Shobowale (1994) Rethinking Development Assistance for Renewable Electricity (Washington: World Resources Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • List, J. and D. Sturm (2006) ‘How Elections Matter: Theory and Evidence from Environmental Policy’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(4), pp. 1249-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, J. (2004) ‘100 Years of Geothermal Power Production’, Geo-Heat Center Bulletin, 25(3), pp. 11-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelowa, A. and K. Michaelowa (2007) ‘Climate or Development: Is ODA Diverted from Its Original Purpose?’, Climatic Change, 84(1), pp. 5-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelowa, A. and K. Michaelowa (2010a) Coding Error or Statistical Embellishment? The Political Economy of Reporting Climate Aid, CIS Working Paper No. 56 (Zurich: Center for Comparative and International Studies, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich).

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelowa, A. and K. Michaelowa (2010b) Climate Business for Poverty Reduction? The Role of the World Bank, CIS Working Paper No. 59 (Zurich: Center for Comparative and International Studies, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD-DAC (1998) Definition of the Rio Marker on Climate Change (Mitigation), http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/18/31/44188001.pdf, date accessed 7 March 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD-DAC (2002a) Aid Targeting the Objectives of the Rio Conventions 1998-2000: A Contribution by the DAC Secretariat for the Information of Participants at the World Summit for Sustainable Development in Johannesburg (Paris: OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD-DAC (2002b) Reporting Directives for the Creditor Reporting System: Addendum Rio Markers, DCD/DAC (2002) 21/ADD (Paris: OECD).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD-DAC (2009a) OECD Development Assistance Committee Tracks Aid in Support of Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation, Information Note (Paris: OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD-DAC (2009b) Measuring Aid Targeting the Objective of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, http://www.oecd.org/dac/stats/rioconventions, date accessed 15 February 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD-DAC (2010) Reporting Directives for the Creditor Reporting System: Addendum on the Climate Change Adaptation Marker, DCD/DAC (2007) 39/FINAL/ADD3 (Paris: OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prometheus Institute (2007) ‘23rd Annual Data Collection - Final’, PV News, 26(4), pp. 8-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prometheus Institute and Greentech Media (2009) ‘25th Annual Data Collection Results: PV Production Explodes in 2008’, PV News, 28(4), pp. 15-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purohit, P. and A. Michaelowa (2007) ‘CDM Potential of Bagasse Cogeneration in India’, Energy Policy, 35, pp. 4779-98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, T., K. Starr, T. Jones and D. Abdel-Fattah (2008) The Reality of Official Climate Aid (Oxford: Oxford Energy and Environment Comment).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, T., M. Weissberger and C. Peratsakis (2010) Trends in Official Climate Finance: Evidence from Human and Machine Coding, Mimeo, Brown University/College of William and Mary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M.G. (1992) ‘Regierungen: Parteipolitische Zusammensetzung’, in Schmidt, M.G. (ed.) Lexikon der Politik, Vol. 3: Die westlichen Lander, (Munich: C.H. Beck), pp. 393-400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sifford, A. and G. Bloomquist (2000) ‘Geothermal Electric Power Production in the United States: A Survey and Update for 1995-99’, Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2000, pp. 441-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theuri, D. (2005) Rural Energy, Stoves and Indoor Air Quality: The Kenyan Experience, http://ehs.sph.berkeley.edu/HEM/hem/China%20Stoves/Presentations/19_Kenya_Daniel_Theuri/Rural%20Enenrgy,%20stoves%20and%20IAP%20final_report_Eng.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP Riso Centre (2010) CDM Pipeline, http://www.cdmpipeline.org, date accessed 5 February 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Energy (1997) Geothermal Progress Monitor, Report No. 19 (Washington).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, J. (2009) ‘Rich Nations Failing to Meet Climate Aid Pledges’, The Guardian, 20 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, P. and J. Solomon (1998) ‘Wasted Energy: How US Companies and Suharto’s Circle Electrified Indonesia: Power Deals That Cut in First Family and Friends are now Under Attack: Mission-GE Sets the Tone’, Wall Street Journal, 23 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Dams (2000) Dams and Development: A New Framework for Decision-Making (London: Earthscan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Worldwatch Institute (2001) Signposts 2001 (Washington).

    Google Scholar 

  • Worldwatch Institute (2004) Signposts 2004 (Washington).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Axel Michaelowa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Katharina Michaelowa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. The Graduate Institute, Geneva, Switzerland

    Gilles Carbonnier (Professor of Development Economics) (Professor of Development Economics)

Copyright information

© 2011 Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Michaelowa, A., Michaelowa, K. (2011). Old Wine in New Bottles? Does Climate Policy Determine Bilateral Development Aid for Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency?. In: Carbonnier, G. (eds) International Development Policy: Energy and Development. International Development Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-31401-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation