Skip to main content

Content‐Based Instruction

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Language and Education

Introduction

Content‐based instruction (CBI) is an umbrella term referring to instructional approaches that make a dual, though not necessarily equal, commitment to language and content‐learning objectives. CBI has been translated into practice in diverse ways in response to student needs at primary, secondary, tertiary, and adult education levels, in foreign, second, and multiple language contexts. Unlike other language instruction approaches that define primary content in terms of grammatical structures, communicative language functions, or language skills, in CBI, content refers to the use of nonlanguage subject matter that is closely aligned with traditional school subjects, themes of interest to students, or vocational and occupational areas. Most content‐based settings have strong academic orientations, emphasizing the linguistic, cognitive, and metacognitive skills as well as subject matter that students need to succeed in future educational endeavors. In highly diversified...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brinton, D., Snow, M.A., and Wesche, M.: 1989, Content‐Based Second Language Instruction, Newbury House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cenoz, J. and Genesee, F. (eds.): 1998, Beyond Bilingualism: Multilingualism and Multilingual Education, Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamot, A.U. and O'Malley, J.M.: 1987, ‘The cognitive academic language learning approach: A bridge to the mainstream’, TESOL Quarterly 21, 227–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, J.A. (ed.): 1987, ESL through Content‐Area Instruction; Mathematics, Science, Social Studies, Prentice Hall Regents, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creese, A.: 2002, ‘The discursive construction of power in teacher partnerships: Language and subject specialists in mainstream schools’, TESOL Quarterly 36, 597–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J.: 2000, Language Power and Pedagogy: Bilingual Children in the Crossfire, Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Echevarria, J. and Graves, A.: 2007, Sheltered Content Instruction: Teaching English‐Language Learners with Diverse Abilities (third edition), Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Echevarria, J., Vogt, M.E., and Short, D.J.: 2004, Making Content Comprehensible for English Language Learners: The SIOP Model (second edition), Pearson, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enright, D.S. and McCloskey, M.: 1988, Integrating English, Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esbcobar Urmeneta, C. and Perez‐Vidal, C.: 2004, ‘Teacher education for the implementation of a content and language learning approach (CLIL) in the school system’, in R. Wilkinson (ed.), Integrating Content and Language: Meeting the Challenge of a Multilingual Higher Education, Maastricht University Press, Maastricht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fruhauf, G., Coyle, D., and Christ, I. (eds.): 1996, Teaching Content in a Foreign Language: Practice and Perspectives in European Bilingual Education, European Platform for Dutch Education, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, M.: 1999, ‘Assessing ESOL adolescents: Balancing accessibility to learn with accountability for learning’, in C.J. Faltis and P. Wolfe (eds.), So Much to Say: Adolescents, Bilingualism, & ESL in the Secondary School, Teachers College Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabe, W. and Stoller, F.L.: 1997, ‘Content‐based instruction: Research foundations’, in M.A. Snow and D.M. Brinton (eds.), The Content‐Based Classroom: Perspectives on Integrating Language and Content, Longman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenfell, M. (ed.): 2002, Modern Languages Across the Curriculum, Routledge Falmer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R.K. and Swain, M. (eds.): 1997, Immersion Education: International Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jourdenais, R.M. and Springer, S.E. (eds.): 2005, Content, Tasks and Projects in the Language Classroom. 2004 Conference Proceedings. Monterey Institute of International Studies, Monterey, CA [see also http://ciin.miis.edu/proceedings.html].

  • Kaufman, D. and Crandall, J. (eds.): 2005, Content‐Based Instruction in Primary and Secondary School Settings, TESOL, Alexandria, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, M. and Ryan, F. (eds.): 1993, Language and Content: Discipline‐ and Content‐Based Approach to Language Study, D.C. Heath, Lexington, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, D. and Langé, G. (eds.): 1999, Implementing Content and Language Integrated Learning: A Research Driven TIE‐CLIL Foundation Course Reader, Continuing Education Centre, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, D., Maljers, A., and Hartiala, A.: 2001, The CLIL Compendium: Profiling European CLIL Classrooms, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Met, M.: 1998, ‘Curriculum decision‐making in content‐based language teaching’, in J. Cenoz and F. Genesee (eds.), Beyond Bilingualism: Multilingualism and Multilingual Education, Multilingual Matters, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, B.: 1986, Language and Content, Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, B., Leung, C., and Davison, C. (eds.): 2001, English as a Second Language in the Mainstream: Teaching Learning and Identity, Longman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J. and Stoller, F.L. (eds.): 2001, TESOL Journal 10(2/3) (Special topics issue).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pally, M. (ed.): 2000, Sustained Content Teaching in Academic ESL/EFL: A Practical Approach, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez‐Vidal, C.: 1999, ‘Teacher education: The path towards CLIL’, in D. Marsh and B. Marsland (eds.), CLIL Initiatives for the Millenium. Report on the CEILINK Think Tank, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pica, T.: 2002, ‘Subject‐matter content: How does it assist the interactional and linguistic needs of classroom language learners?’ The Modern Language Journal 86, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short, D.J.: 1993, ‘Assessing integrated language and content instruction’, TESOL Quarterly 27, 627–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short, D.J.: 1994, ‘Expanding middle school horizons: Integrating language, culture, and social studies’, TESOL Quarterly 28, 581–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short, D.J.: 2002, ‘Language learning in sheltered social studies classes’, TESOL Journal 11(1), 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, M.A.: 1997, ‘Teaching academic literacy skills: Discipline faculty take responsibility’, in M.A. Snow and D.M. Brinton (eds.), The Content‐Based Classroom: Perspectives on Integrating Language and Content, Longman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, M.A. and Brinton, D. (eds.): 1997, The Content‐Based Classroom: Perspectives on Integrating Language and Content, Longman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, M.A., Met, M., and Genesee, F.: 1989, ‘A conceptual framework for the integration of language and content in second/foreign language instruction’, TESOL Quarterly 23, 201–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoller, F.L.: 2004, ‘Content‐based instruction: Perspectives on curriculum planning’, in M. McGroarty (ed.), Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoller, F.L. and Grabe, W.: 1997, ‘A six‐Ts approach to content‐based instruction’, in M.A. Snow and D.M. Brinton (eds.), The Content‐Based Classroom: Perspectives on Integrating Language and Content, Longman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S.B. and Leaver, B.L. (eds.): 1997, Content‐Based Instruction in Foreign Language Education: Models and Methods, Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M.: 2000, ‘French immersion research in Canada: Recent contributions to SLA and applied linguistics’, in W. Grabe (ed.), Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M. and Lapkin, S.: 1982, Evaluating Bilingual Education: A Canadian Case Study, Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, Avon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesche, M.B. (ed.): 2001, ‘Special issue: French immersion and content‐based language teaching in Canada/Immersion et apprentissage axe sur le contenu au Canada’, The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes 58(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R. (ed.): 2004, Integrating Content and Language: Meeting the Challenge of a Multilingual Higher Education, Maastricht University Press, Maastricht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, D.: 2002, ‘Content and language integrated learning: An evaluation of the German approach’, in D.W.C. So and G.J. Jones (eds.), Education and Society in Plurilingual Contexts, Vrije Universiteit Brussel University, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Stoller, F.L. (2008). Content‐Based Instruction. In: Hornberger, N.H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_89

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_89

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-32875-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-30424-3

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics