Abstract
Timbre has been an important concept for scientific exploration of music at least since the time of Helmholtz ([1877] 1954). Since Helmholtz’s time, a number of studies have defined and investigated acoustical features of musical instrument tones to determine their perceptual importance, or salience (e.g., Grey, 1975, 1977; Kendall, 1986; Kendall et al., 1999; Luce and Clark, 1965; McAdams et al., 1995, 1999; Saldanha and Corso, 1964; Wedin and Goude, 1972). Most of these studies have considered only nonpercussive, or continuant, tones of Western orchestral instruments (or emulations thereof). In the past few years, advances in computing power and programming have made possible and affordable the definition and control of new acoustical variables. This chapter gives an overview of past and current research, with a special emphasis on the time-variant aspects of musical timbre. According to common observation, “music is made of tones in time” (Spaeth, 1933). We will also consider the fact that music is made of “time in tones.”
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arabie, P., Carroll, J. D., and DeSarbo, W. S. (1987). Three-Way Scaling and Clustering. Sage university papers. Quantitative applications in the social sciences; no. 07–065. (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills and London).
Beauchamp, J. W. (1982). “Synthesis by spectral amplitude and ‘brightness’ matching of analyzed musical instrument tones,” J. Audio Eng. Soc. 30(6), 396–406.
Beauchamp, J. W. (1993). “Unix workstation software for analysis, graphics, modification, and synthesis of musical sounds,” 94th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society, Berlin, Audio Eng. Soc. Preprint 3479.
Beauchamp, J. W. (1998). “Methods for measurement and manipulation of timbral physical correlates,” Proc. 16th International Congress on Acoustics and 135th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, 1998, Seattle, Vol. 3, P. K. Kuhl and L. A. Crum, eds. (Acoustical Society of America, Woodbury, NY), pp. 1883–1884.
Berger, K. W. (1964). “Some factors in the recognition of timbre,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 36(10), 1888–1891.
Britten, B. (1946). Variations and Fugue on a Theme of Henry Purcell (The Young Person's Guide to the Orchestra) (Boosey & Hawkes, London and New York).
Campbell, W. C. and Heller, J. J. (1978). “The contribution of the legato transient to instrument identification,” Proc. Research Symposium on the Psychology and Acoustics of Music, 1978, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, pp. 30–44.
Campbell, W. and Heller, J. (1979). “Convergence procedures for investigating music listening tasks,” Bull. Council for Res. Music Educ. 59, 18–23.
Clark, M., Jr., Luce, D., Abrams, R., Schlossberg, H., and Rome, J. (1963). “Preliminary experiments on the aural significance of parts of tones of orchestral instruments and on choral tones,” J. Audio Eng. Soc. 11(1), 45–54.
Clark, M., Jr., Robertson, P. T., and Luce, D. (1964). “A preliminary experiment on the perceptual basis for musical instrument families,” J. Audio Eng. Soc. 12(3), 199–203.
Ehresman, D., and Wessel, D. (1978). Perception of Timbral Analogies, IRCAM Technical Report 13/78 (IRCAM, Centre Georges Pompidou, Paris).
Ekman, G. (1965). “Two methods for the analysis of perceptual dimensionality,” Perceptual and Motor Skills 20, 557–572.
Elliott, C. A. (1975). “Attacks and releases as factors in instrument identification,” J. Res. Music Educ. 23(1), 35–40.
Estes, W. K. (1994). Classification and Cognition (Oxford University Press, New York).
Faure, A., McAdams, S., and Nosulenko, V. (1996). “Verbal correlates of perceptual dimensions of timbre,” Proc. 1996 Int. Conf. on Music Perception and Cognition, Montreal (Faculty of Music, McGill University, Montreal), pp. 79–84.
Freed, D. J. (1990). “Auditory correlates of perceived mallet hardness for a set of recorded percussive sound events,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87(1), 311–322.
Grey, J. M. (1975). An Exploration of Musical Timbre (Report STAN-M-2, CCRMA, Dept. of Music, Stanford University, Stanford, CA).
Grey, J. M. (1977). “Multidimensional perceptual scaling of musical timbres,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 61(5), 1270–177.
Grey, J. M., and Gordon, J. W. (1978). “Perceptual effects of spectral modifications on musical timbres,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63(5), 1493–1500.
Guyot, F. (1992). “Etude de la pertinence de deux critères acoustiques pour caractériser la sonorité des sons à spectre reduits,” Unpublished D.E.A. thesis, Université du Maine, Le Mans, France.
Hajda, J. M. (1995). “The relationship between perceptual and acoustical analyses of natural and synthetic impulse signals,” masters thesis, University of California, Los Angeles, 1995, Masters Abstracts International, 33(6). (University Microfilms International Publications No. 13–61, 681)
Hajda, J. (1996). “A new model for segmenting the envelope of musical signals: The relative salience of steady state versus attack, revisited,” 101st Convention of the Audio Engineering Society, Los Angeles, Audio Eng. Soc. Preprint 4391.
Hajda, J. M. (1997). “Relevant acoustical cues in the identification of Western orchestral instrument tones” (abstract), J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102(5), pt. 2, 3085.
Hajda, J. M., Kendall, R. A., Carterette, E. C., and Harshberger, M. L. (1997). “Methodological issues in timbre research,” in Perception and Cognition of Music, I. Deliège and J. Sloboda, eds. (Psychology Press, Hove, UK), pp. 253–306.
Hajda, J. M. (1998). “The effect of amplitude and centroid trajectories on the timbre of percussive and nonpercussive orchestral instruments,” Proc. 16th International Congress on Acoustics and 135th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 3, Seattle (Acoustical Society of America, Woodbury, NY), pp. 1887–1888.
Hajda, J. M. (1999). “The Effect of Time-Variant Acoustical Properties on Orchestral Instrument Timbres,” doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles. UMI number 9947018.
Helmholtz, H. L. F. ([1877], 1954). On the Sensations of Tone as a Psychological Basis for the Theory of Music (Dover, New York).
Iverson, P., and Krumhansl, C. L. (1993). “Isolating the dynamic attributes of musical timbre,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94(5), 2595–2603.
Jeong, D., and Fricke, F. R. (1998). “The dependence of timbre perception on the acoustics of the listening environment,” Proc. 16th Int. Congress on Acoustics and 135th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 3, Seattle (Acoustical Society of America, Woodbury, NY), pp. 2225–2226.
Kendall, R. A. (1986). “The role of acoustic signal partitions in listener categorization of musical phrases,” Music Perception 4, 185–214.
Kendall, R. A. and Carterette, E. C. (1992). “Convergent methods in psychomusical research based on integrated, interactive computer control,” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 24(2), 116–131.
Kendall, R. A. and Carterette, E. C. (1993a). “Verbal attributes of simultaneous wind instrument timbres: I. von Bismarck's adjectives,” Music Perception 10(4), 445–468.
Kendall, R. A. and Carterette, E. C. (1993b). “Verbal attributes of simultaneous wind instrument timbres: II. Adjectives induced from Piston's ‘Orchestration’,” Music Perception 10, 469–502.
Kendall, R. A. and Carterette, E. C. (1993c). “Identification and blend of timbres as a basis for orchestration,” Contemp. Music Rev. 9(1/2), 51–67.
Kendall, R. A. and Carterette, E. C. (1996). “Difference thresholds for timbre related to spectral centroid,” Proc. 4th Int. Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, Montreal, Canada, (Faculty of Music, McGill University, Montreal), pp. 91–95.
Kendall, R. A., Carterette, E. C., and Hajda, J. M. (1999). “Perceptual and acoustical features of natural and synthetic orchestral instrument tones,” Music Perception 16(3), 327–363.
Knopoff, L. (1963). “An index for the relative quality among musical instruments,” Ethnomusicology 7(3), 229–233.
Krimphoff, J. (1993). “Analyse acoustique et perception du timbre,” unpublished D.E.A. thesis, Université du Maine, Le Mans, France.
Krimphoff, J., McAdams, S., and Winsberg, S. (1994). “Caractérisation du timbre des sons complexes. II. Analyses acoustiques et quantification psychophysique,” [Characterization of the timbre of complex sounds. 2. Acoustic analysis and psychophysical quantification.] J. de Physique 4(C5), 625–628.
Krumhansl, C. L. (1989). “Why is musical timbre so hard to understand?,” in Structure and Perception of Electroacoustic Sound and Music: Proceedings of the Marcus Wallenberg Symposium held in Lund, Sweden, on 21–28 August 1988, S. Nielzen and O. Olsson, eds. (Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam), pp. 43–53.
Kruskal, J. B. and Wish, M. (1978). Multidimensional Scaling, Sage university papers, Quantitative applications in the social sciences, no. 07–011 (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills and London).
Lakatos, L. (2000). “A common perceptual space for harmonic and percussive timbres,” Perception & Psychophysics 62(7), 1426–1439.
Lichte, W. H. (1941). “Attributes of complex tones,” J. Exp. Psych. 28, 455–480.
Luce, D. A. (1963). Physical Correlates of Nonpercussive Musical Instrument Tones, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Luce, D. and Clark, M. (1965). “Durations of attack transients of nonpercussive orchestral instruments,” J. Audio Eng. Soc. 13(3), 194–199.
Martens, W. L. (1985). “Palette: An environment for developing an individualized set of psychophysically scaled timbres,” Proc. 1985 International Computer Music Conference, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, (Computer Music Association, San Francisco), pp. 355–365.
McAdams, S., Winsberg, S., Donnadieu, S., De Soete, G., and Krimphoff, J. (1995). “Perceptual scaling of synthesized musical timbres: Common dimensions, specificities, and latent subject classes,” Psych. Res. 58(3), 177–192.
McAdams, S., Beauchamp, J. W., and Meneguzzi, S. (1999). “Discrimination of musical instrument sounds resynthesized with simplified spectrotemporal parameters,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105(2), 882–897.
Miller, J. R. and Carterette, E. C. (1975). “Perceptual space for musical structures,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 58, 711–720.
Opolko, F. and Wapnick, J. (1989). McGill University Master Samples User's Manual (Faculty of Music, McGill University, Montreal).
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., and Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The Measurement of Meaning (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL).
Piston, W. (1955). Orchestration (W. W. Norton, New York).
Saldanha, E. L. and Corso, J. F. (1964). “Timbre cues and the identification of musical instruments,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 36, 2021–2026.
Sandell, G. J. (1995). “Roles for spectral centroid and other factors in determining ‘blended’ instrument pairings in orchestration,” Music Perception 13, 209–246.
Sandell, G. J. (1998). “Macrotimbre: Contribution of attack and steady state,” Proc. 16th Int. Congress on Acoustics and 135th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 3, Seattle (Acoustical Society of America, Woodbury, NY), pp. 1881–1882.
Seashore, C. E. ([1938], 1967). The Psychology of Music (Dover, New York).
Serafini, S. (1995). “Timbre judgments of Javanese gamelan instruments by trained and untrained adults,” Psychomusicology 14, 137–153.
Shepard, R. N. (1982). “Structural representations of musical pitch,” in The Psychology of Music, D. Deutsch, ed. (Academic Press, New York), pp. 334–390.
Slaney, M., Covell, M., and Lassiter, B. (1995). “Automatic Audio Morphing,” Proc. 1996 IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP-96), Vol. 2 (IEEE, New York), pp. 1001–1004.
Spaeth, S. G. (1933). The Art of Enjoying Music (McGraw-Hill, New York).
von Bismarck, G. (1974). “Timbre of steady tones: A factorial investigation of its verbal attributes,” Acustica 30, 146–159.
von Helmholtz, H. L. F. (1877). Die Lehre von den Tonempfindungen als physiologische Grudlage für die Theorie der Musik. F. Vieweg and Sohn, Braunschweig. English translation by A. J. Ellis, “On the Sensations of Tone as a Physiological Basis for the Theory of Music (2nd ed., 1885),” reprinted by Dover Publications, New York, 1954.
Wedin, L. and Goude, G. (1972). “Dimension analysis of the perception of instrumental timbre,” Scandinavian J. Psych. 13(3), 228–240.
Wessel, D. L. (1973). “Psychoacoustics and music: A report from Michigan State University,” PAGE: Bulletin of the Computers Arts Soc. 30, 1–2.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
HAJDA, J.M. (2007). The Effect of Dynamic Acoustical Features on Musical Timbre. In: Beauchamp, J.W. (eds) Analysis, Synthesis, and Perception of Musical Sounds. Modern Acoustics and Signal Processing. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32576-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32576-7_7
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-32496-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-32576-7
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)