Skip to main content

Researching Corporate and White-Collar Crimeinan Eraof Neo-Liberalism

  • Chapter
International Handbook of White-Collar and Corporate Crime

Abstract

Research conducted within the discipline of criminology has been relatively blind to corporate and white-collar crime, a myopia that has remained even in the face of overwhelming evidence that in both Britain and in the United States of America the social and economic impact of corporate and white-collar crimes upon their victims massively exceeds the corresponding impact of conventional crimes.1 This last fact is acknowledged inmuch contemporary criminology, though such acknowledgment tends to appear somewhat gesturally, as if mere recognition of the existence of corporate and white-collar crimes is enough to bolster the integrity of criminological research. The truth of the matter is that, despite such token recognition of the crimes of the powerful, criminological research rarely takes these types of offenses and offenders as an object of study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alvesalo, A., and S. Tombs (2004) Evaluating Economic Crime Control? Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, November, Nashville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrigo, B. (2000) “Critical Criminology’s Discontent: The Perils of Punishing and a Call to Action.” The Critical Criminologist,http://sun.soci.niu.edu/~critcrim/~critschooUbarrigo.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J., and M. McConville (1977) Negotiated Justice, Oxford: Martin Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (1994) The Limits of Competence: Knowledge, Higher Education and Society. Buckingham, England: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, C, and M. Low (1996) Lingua Franca: International Publishing and the Academy as Public Sphere. British Sociological Association Annual Conference, University of Reading, 4 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beder, S. (1997) Global Spin. The Corporate Assault on Environmentalism. Totnes, England: Green Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, T. (1999) Romanes Lecture. Oxford, 2 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosely, S.(2000) “$2m Plot to Discredit Smoking Study Exposed.” The Guardian, 7 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A., ed. (1988) Doing Research in Organisations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S.(1981) “Foot prints on the Sand: A Further Report on Criminology and the Sociology of Deviance in Britain.” Pp. 220–247 in Crime and Society. Readings in History and Theory, Editors M. Fitzgerald, G. McLennan, and J. Pawson. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., and Taylor, L. (1977) “Talking About Prison Blues.” In Doing Sociological Research, Editors C. Bell and H. Newby London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crace, J. (2001) “Free and Fair.” The Guardian. Education Supplement, 29 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, J. (1998) “Introduction.” In Universities and Globalisation, Editors J. Currie and J. Newson. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, J., and Newson, J., eds. (1998) Universities and Globalisation. Critical perspectives, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, C. (2000) “Home Office Censors Report from Anti-Torture Group.” The Guardian, 13 January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M. (1998) “Commodification and Control in Mass Higher Education: A Double Edged Sword.” In The New Higher Education: Issues and Directions for the Post-Dearing University, Editors D. Jary and M. Parker. Stoke-on-Trent: Staffordshire University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, B. (2001) “Corporate Culture and the Academic Left.” In Market Killing: What the Free Market Does and What Social Scientists Can Do About It, Editors, G. Philo and D. Miller. London: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESRC (1999) Annual Report1998/99 www.esrc.ac.uk/esrccontent/publicationslist/ arep9899/report9899.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Freiberg, A. (1997) “Commercial Confidentiality, Criminal Justice and the Public Inter-est.” Current Issues in Criminal Justice 9:125–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, D. (1994) “Of Crimes and Criminals: the development of criminology in Britain.” in Maguire, M., Morgan, R. and Reiner, R., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 17–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, R. (1992) “The Dynamics of University Research in the United States: 1945–90.” in Whiston, T. and Geiger, R., eds., Research and Higher Education: the United Kingdom and the United States, Buckingham,England: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geis, G., and Goff, C. (1983) “Introduction.” in Sutherland, E, White Collar Crime: the uncut version, London: Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geis, G., Meier, R. and Salinger, L. (1995) “Introduction.” in Geis, G., Meier, R. and Salinger, L., eds., White Collar Crime: Classic and Contemporary Views, New York: hree Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geis, G., Mobley, A., and Shichor, D. (1999) “Private Prisons, Criminological Research,and Conflict of Interest. A Case Study.” Crime and Delinquency45. 372–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelbspan, R. (1997) “Hot Air on Global Wanning: science and academia in the service of the fossil fuel industry.” Multinational Monitor, 18(11), November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C. (1999) The Political Economy of New Labour, London: Unwin Hyraan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillyard, P and Sim, J (1997) “The Political Economy of Socio-legal Research.” in Thomas, P (ed.) Socio-legal Studies, Aldershot: Dartmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillyard, P., Sim, J., Tombs, S., and Whyte, D, “Leaving a “Stain Upon the Silence”: contemporary criminology and the politics of dissent.” British Journal of Criminology, 44, (3), 369–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, G (1996) “The Politics of Criminological Research.” in Sapsford, R (ed.) Researching Crime and Criminal Justice, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jupp, V. (1989) Methods of Criminological Research, London: Unwin Hyman.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kelsey, J (1998) “Privatizing the Universities,” Journal of Law and Society. 25, (1), 51–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kishun, R. (1998) “Internationalisation in South Africa.” in Scott, P., ed..The Meanings of Mass Higher Education, Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. (1993) Doing Research on Sensitive Topics, London, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. (1997) “Socio-Legal Research-what’s the use?.” in Thomas, P., ed., Socio-Legal Studies, Aldershot: Dartmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M. (1987) Regulating Fraud. White-Collar Crime and the Criminal Process, London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, Lord (2000) “Ruling By Research.” Social Sciences—news from the ESRC, May 2000, www.esrc.ac.uk/news 1.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S. (1974) Power. A radical view, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miliband, R. (1973) The State inCapitalist Society, London: Quartet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monbiot, G. (2000)Captive State: the corporate takeover of Britain, London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monbiot, G. (1997) “Law and the Profits of PR.” The Guardian, 21 August, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • M uttitt, G., and Lindblom, H. (2003) Degrees of Capture: an examination of the relationship between the upstream oil and gas industry and UK higher education institutions, Oxford: Corporate Watch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newson, J., and Buchbinder, H. (1988) The University Means Business, Toronto: Garamond Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaus, M. (1972) “The Professional Organisation of Sociology: a view from below.” in Blackburn, R. (ed.) Ideology and Social Science: readings in critical social science, London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, L.(1997) “Globalisation andthe Universities: toward themarketuniversity?.” Social Dynamics, 23, (1): 42–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osler, D. (2002) Labour Party PLC. New labour as a party of business, Edinburgh: Mainstream.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ovetz, R.(1996) “Turning Resistance into Rebellion: student movements and the entrepreneurialisation of the universities.” Capital and Class, 58, 113–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, F., and Tombs, S. (1990) “Ideology, Hegemony and Empiricism: compliance theories of regulation.” British Journal of Criminology, 30 (4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, F., and Tombs, S. (1991) “Policing Corporate’ skid Rows.’ Areply to Keith Hawkins.” British Journal of Criminology, 31(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, F., and Tombs, S. (1998) Toxic Capitalism: corporate crime and the chemical industry, Aldershot: Dartmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presdee, M., and Walters, R. (1998) “The Perils and Politics of Criminological Research and the treat toAcademic Freedom.” Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 10, (2), 156–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punch, M. (1996) Dirty Business: exploring corporate misconduct. Analysis and cases, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punch, M. (2000) “Suite Violence: why managers manage and corporations kill.” Crime Law and Social Change, 33, 243–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiman, J. (1998) The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivers, J. (1998) “Chomsky Warns of Corporate Secrecy Threat.” Times Higher Education Supplement, November 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock, P. (1994) “The Social Organisation of British Criminology.” in Maguire, M., Morgan, R., and Reiner, R., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 125–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock, P., and Holdaway, S. (1998) “Thinking about Criminology: ‘facts are bits of biography’.” in Holdaway, S. and Rock, P., eds., Thinking About Criminology, London: UCL Press,1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowell, A. (1996) Green Backlash: Corporate subversion of the environment movement, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffrin, A. (2000) The Business of Books, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scraton, P. (2001) “A Response to Lynch and the Schwendingers.” The Critical Criminologist, 1,2, March, 1-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scraton, P., Sim, J. and Skidmore, P. (1991) Prisons Under Protest, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, M.(1972) “TheComing Crisis of Radical Sociology.” in Blackburn, R (ed.) Ideology and Social Science: readings in critical social science, London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sim, J., Ruggiero, V, and Ryan, M (1995)“Punishment in Europe:perceptions and commonalities.” in Ruggiero, V, Ryan, M and Sim, J (eds.) Western European Prison Systems, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sim, J., Scraton, P., and Gordon, P. (1987) “Introduction: Crime, the State and Critical Analysis.” in Scraton, P (ed.) Law Order and the Authoritarian State, Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, C. (1998) “Universities, Empire and the Production of Knowledge: an introduction.” in Simpson, C, ed., Universities and Empire. Money and politicsin the social sciences during the cold war. New York: the New Press, xi–xxxiv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slapper, G., and Tombs, S. (1999) Corporate Crime, Harlow Essex: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., and Leslie, L. (1997) Academic Capitalism: politics, policies and the entrepreneurial university, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S. (1998) “National Higher EducationPolicies in a GlobalEconomy.” in Currie, J., and Newson, J., eds., Universities and Globalisation, Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snider, L.(1990) “Cooperative Models and Corporate Crime: panacea or cop-out?.” Crime and Delinquency, 36 (3), 373–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snider, L.(1997) Downsizing, Deregulation and Corporate Crime, Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, 19–22 November, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snider, L. (2000) “The Sociology of Corporate Crime: an obituary (or: whose knowledge claims havelegs?).” Theoretical Criminology, 4 (2), 166–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snider, L.(2003) “No Funding, No Access, Then You Get Sued: methodological obstacles to studying corporate crime.” in Tombs, S., and Whyte, D. (eds.), Researching the Crimes of the Powerful, Peter Lang: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soley, L. (1998) “The New Corporate Yen for Scholarship.” in Simpson, C, ed., Universities and Empire. Money and politics in the social sciences during the cold war, New York: the New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankiewicz, R (1986) Academics and Entrepreneurs: developing university-industry relations, London: Frances Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E (1983) White Collar Crime: the uncut version, London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E.P. (1970)Warwick University Ltd, Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. P. (1980) Writing by Candlelight, London: Merlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tombs, S.(1990) “Industrial Injuries in British Manufacturing.” Sociological Review, 38, 2, May, 324–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tombs, S. (1996) “Injury, Death and the Deregulation Fetish: the of occupational safety regulation in United Kingdom manufacturing industries.” International Journal of Health Services, 26 (2), 327–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tombs, S.(2001)“Thinking About ‘White-Collar’ Crime.” in Lindgren, S-Å.,ed., White-Collar Crime Research. Old Views and Future Potentials. Lectures and Papers from a ScandinavianSeminar. (BRÅ-Rapport 2001:1), Stockholm: Brottsförebyggande rådet/Fritzes, 13–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tombs, S., and Whyte, D., eds. (2003a) Unmasking the Crimes of the Powerful: Scrutinising States and Corporations?, New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tombs, S., and Whyte, D. (2003b) “Scrutinisingthe Powerful: Crime, contemporary political economyand critical social research.” in Tombs, S. and Whyte, D., eds., Unmasking the Crimes of the Powerful: Scrutinising States and Corporations?, New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis, A. (1994) “Ministers Suppress Research.” The Guardian, 4 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Swaaningen, R. (1997) Critical Criminology:Visions from Europe, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweedale, G. (2000) Magic Mineral to Killer Dust: Turner and Newall and the asbestos hazard, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweedale, G. (2003) “Researching Corporate Crime: a business historian’s perspective.” in Tombs, S. and Whyte, D. (eds.), Researching the Crimes of the Powerful, New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Swaaningen, R. (1997) Critical Criminology:Visions from Europe, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Swaaningen, R. (1999) “Reclaiming Critical Criminology: social justice and the European Tradition.” Theoretical Criminology,3, 1, 5–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vick, D.W., and Campbell, K. (2001) “Public Protests, Private Lawsuits, and the Market: the investor response to the McLibel case.” Journal of Law and Society, 28 (2), 204–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, D. (1999) Power, Ideology and the Regulation of Safety in the post-Piper Alpha Offshore Oil Industry, unpublished PhD thesis, Liverpool: John Moores University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, D. (2000) “Researching the Powerful: toward a political economy of method?,” in King, R. and Wincup, E., eds., Doing Research on Crime and Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tombs, S., Whyte, D. (2007). Researching Corporate and White-Collar Crimeinan Eraof Neo-Liberalism. In: Pontell, H.N., Geis, G. (eds) International Handbook of White-Collar and Corporate Crime. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-34111-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics