Skip to main content

An approach for coaching collaboration based on difference recognition and participation tracking

  • Chapter
The Role of Technology in CSCL

Abstract: This chapter describes a new approach to coaching collaboration in a synchronous computer mediated learning context. Prior work on supporting collaboration has relied largely on comparing student discourse to models of collaborative discourse. Comparison of student work to expert solutions is prevalent in individual coaching paradigms. Although these approaches are valuable, our approach evaluates the potential contribution of tracking student participation during group problem solving and comparing students' individual and group solutions. Our theoretical motivation is that conflicts between individual and group solutions constitute learning opportunities, provided that students recognize and address these conflicts. The coach encourages such negotiation when differences are detected, and also encourages participation in other ways. Our evaluation relied primarily on expert judgement and secondarily on student reactions to the coach. Results show that the quality of the generated advice was good; however, other knowledge sources should be consulted to improve coverage of advice to a broader range of situations and advice types. This coaching approach could be applied in those learning tasks oriented towards the solution of a problem and in which structured representations of problem solutions exist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abrami, P. C., & Bures, E. M. (1996). Computer Supported Collaborative Learning and Distance Education, Reviews of lead article. The American Journal of Distance Education, 10 (2), 37-42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayala, G., & Yano, Y. (1996). Learner models for supporting awareness and collaboration in a CSCL environment. Proceedings of the Third International Conference of Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS’96), Montreal, Canada, 158-167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baghaei, N., & Mitrovic, A. (2005). COLLECT-UML: Supporting Individual and Collaborative Learning of UML class diagrams in a Constraint-Based Intelligent Tutoring System. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Knowledge-Based & Intelligent Information & Engineering Systems, Melbourne, Australia, 458-464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M. J., & Bielaczyc, K. (1995). Missed opportunities for learning in collaborative problem-solving interactions. In J. Greer (Ed. ), Proceedings of the AI-ED 95-World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 210-217), Washington, DC, August 16-19. AACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M. J., & Lund, K. (1996). Flexibly structuring the interaction in a CSCL environment. In P. Brna, A. Paiva & J. Self (Eds. ), Proceedings of the Euro-AIED Conference (European Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education) (pp. 401-407), Lisbon, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barros, B., & Verdejo, F. M. (2000). Analyzing student interaction processes in order to improve collaboration. The DEGREE approach, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11, 221-241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batini, C., Ceri, S., & Navathe, S. B. (1992). Conceptual Database Design: An Entity-Relationship Approach. Benjamin/Cummings, Redwood City, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batra, D., & Antony, S. R. (1994). Novice errors in conceptual database design. European Journal of Information Systems, 3(1), 57-69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. Resnick (Ed. ), Knowing, Learning and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, R. R., & Brown, J. S. (1982). An investigation of computer coaching for informal learning activities. In D. Sleeman, & J. S. Brown (Eds. ), Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 79-98). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castaños, J. M., Morales, L. C., Tun, J. A., & Constantino, M. A. (2005, October). A coached Collaborative Learning Environment for Entity-Relationship Modeling: COLER, Poster Session presented at XXI Simposio Internacional de Computación en la Educación SOMECE 2005, Hermosillo, Sonora, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantino-González, M. A. (2000). A Computer Coach to Support Synchronous Computer-Mediated Collaborative Learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Monterrey Institute of Technology (ITESM) Campus Monterrey, Monterrey, N. L., México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantino-González, M. A., & Suthers, D. D. (2000). A Coached Collaborative Learning Environment for Entity-Relationship Modeling. In G. Gauthier, C. Frasson, & K. VanLehn (Eds. ), Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference ITS-2000 (pp. 324-333). Berlín: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantino-González, M. A., Suthers, D. D., & Icaza, J. (2001). Designing and Evaluating a Collaboration Coach: Knowledge and Reasoning. In J. D. Moore, C. L. Redfield, & W. L. Johnson (Eds. ). Artificial Intelligence in Education: AI-ED in the Wired and Wireless Future, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 176-187). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantino-González, M. A., & Suthers, D. D. (2001). Coaching Collaboration by Comparing Solutions and Tracking Participation. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings, & K. Hakkarainen (Eds. ) European Perspectives on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, Proceedings of the First European Conference on CSCL(pp. 173-180). Netherlands: Universiteit Maastricht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantino-González, M. A., & Suthers, D. D. (2003). Automated Coaching of Collaboration based on Workspace Analysis: Evaluation and Implications for Future Learning Environments. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-36), January 6-9, Wakoloa, Hawaii (CD-ROM), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantino-González, M. A., Suthers, D. D., & Escamilla, J. G. (2003). Coaching Web-based Collaborative Learning based on Problem Solution Differences and Participation. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13(2-4), 263-299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coronado-López, F. J. (2000). Diseño y desarrollo del módulo del profesor para COLER, Unpublished master’s thesis. Monterrey Institute of Technology (ITESM) Campus Monterrey, Monterrey, N. L. México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Anderson, J. R. (1997). Intelligent tutoring systems. In M. G. Helander, T. K. Landauer, & P. Prabhu (Eds. ), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction (2nd ed., pp. 849-874). Amsterdan, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitracopoulou, A., & Petrou, A. (2005). Advanced collaborative distance learning systems for young students: Design issues and current trends on new cognitive and metacognitive tools, THEMES in Education International Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolonen, J. A., Chen, W., & Mǿrch, A. I. Integrating software agents with FLE3. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning2003(CSCL 2003)(pp. 157-161). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fesakis, G., Petrou, A., & Dimitracopoulou, A. (2004). Collaboration activity function: an interaction analysis tool for computer supported collaborative learning activities. Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2004), 196-200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative Learning Enhances Critical Thinking, Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 22-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, A., & Hall, L. (1998). A Collaborative Learning Environment for Data Modeling. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Symposium Conference (pp. 158-162). Menlo Park, Calif.: AAAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning Together and Alone, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Les, J., Cumming, G., & Finch, S. (1999). Agent systems for diversity in human learning. In S. P. Lajioe, & M. Vivet (Eds. ) Artificial Intelligence in Education: Open Learning Environments: New Computer Technologies to Support Learning, Exploration and Collaboration: Proceedings of the AI-ED 99 Conference (pp. 13-20). Amsterdan: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McManus, M. M., & Aiken, R. M. (1995). Monitoring Computer Based Collaborative Problem Solving, Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 6(4), 308-336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muehlenbrock, M., & Hoppe, H. U. (1999). Computer supported interaction analysis of group problem solving. In C. Hoadley, & J. Roschelle (Eds. ) Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning CSCL-99 (pp. 398-405), Palo Alto, CA. December. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okamoto, T., Inaba, A., & Hasaba, Y. (1995). The Intelligent Learning Support System on the Distributed Cooperative Environment. In J. Greer (Ed. ), Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in Education AI-ED’95, August, Washington, D. C., 588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrou, A., & Dimitracopoulou, A. (2003). Is synchronous computer mediated collaborative problem solving ‘justified’ only when by distance? Teachers’ point of views and interventions with co-located groups during every day class activities. In H. U. Hoppe (Ed. ), Proceedings of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning Conference: Designing for Change in Networked Learning Environments, CSCL 2003, June, Bergen, Norway, 449-455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ram, S., & Ramesh, V. (1998). Collaborative Conceptual Schema Design: A Process Model and a Prototype System, ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 16(4), 347-371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1994). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, Currency Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative Learning (2nd ed. ). Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soller, A., Martinez, A., Jermann, P., & Muehlenbrock, M. (2005). From Mirroring to Guiding: A Review of State of the Art Technology for Supporting Collaborative Learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15, 261-290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suraweera, P., & Mitrovic, A. (2004). An Intelligent Tutoring System for Entity Relationship Modelling, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14(3-4), 375-417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suthers, D. D., & Jones, D. (1997). An Architecture for Intelligent Collaborative Educational Systems. In Proceedings of the 8th World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED’97), August, Kobe, 55-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suthers, D. D. Toth, E. E., & Weiner, A. (1997). An integrated approach to implementing collaborative inquiry in the classroom. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL’97), Toronto, 272-279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suthers, D. (2005). Collaborative Knowledge Construction through Shared Representations. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawai’i International Conference on the System Sciences (HICSS-38), January, Waikoloa, Hawai’i(CD-ROM), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Constantino-González, M.d.l.Á., Suthers, D.D. (2007). An approach for coaching collaboration based on difference recognition and participation tracking. In: Hoppe, H.U., Ogata, H., Soller, A. (eds) The Role of Technology in CSCL. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, vol 9. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71136-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics