Abstract: This chapter describes a new approach to coaching collaboration in a synchronous computer mediated learning context. Prior work on supporting collaboration has relied largely on comparing student discourse to models of collaborative discourse. Comparison of student work to expert solutions is prevalent in individual coaching paradigms. Although these approaches are valuable, our approach evaluates the potential contribution of tracking student participation during group problem solving and comparing students' individual and group solutions. Our theoretical motivation is that conflicts between individual and group solutions constitute learning opportunities, provided that students recognize and address these conflicts. The coach encourages such negotiation when differences are detected, and also encourages participation in other ways. Our evaluation relied primarily on expert judgement and secondarily on student reactions to the coach. Results show that the quality of the generated advice was good; however, other knowledge sources should be consulted to improve coverage of advice to a broader range of situations and advice types. This coaching approach could be applied in those learning tasks oriented towards the solution of a problem and in which structured representations of problem solutions exist.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abrami, P. C., & Bures, E. M. (1996). Computer Supported Collaborative Learning and Distance Education, Reviews of lead article. The American Journal of Distance Education, 10 (2), 37-42.
Ayala, G., & Yano, Y. (1996). Learner models for supporting awareness and collaboration in a CSCL environment. Proceedings of the Third International Conference of Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS’96), Montreal, Canada, 158-167.
Baghaei, N., & Mitrovic, A. (2005). COLLECT-UML: Supporting Individual and Collaborative Learning of UML class diagrams in a Constraint-Based Intelligent Tutoring System. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Knowledge-Based & Intelligent Information & Engineering Systems, Melbourne, Australia, 458-464.
Baker, M. J., & Bielaczyc, K. (1995). Missed opportunities for learning in collaborative problem-solving interactions. In J. Greer (Ed. ), Proceedings of the AI-ED 95-World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 210-217), Washington, DC, August 16-19. AACE.
Baker, M. J., & Lund, K. (1996). Flexibly structuring the interaction in a CSCL environment. In P. Brna, A. Paiva & J. Self (Eds. ), Proceedings of the Euro-AIED Conference (European Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education) (pp. 401-407), Lisbon, October.
Barros, B., & Verdejo, F. M. (2000). Analyzing student interaction processes in order to improve collaboration. The DEGREE approach, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11, 221-241.
Batini, C., Ceri, S., & Navathe, S. B. (1992). Conceptual Database Design: An Entity-Relationship Approach. Benjamin/Cummings, Redwood City, California.
Batra, D., & Antony, S. R. (1994). Novice errors in conceptual database design. European Journal of Information Systems, 3(1), 57-69.
Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. Resnick (Ed. ), Knowing, Learning and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Burton, R. R., & Brown, J. S. (1982). An investigation of computer coaching for informal learning activities. In D. Sleeman, & J. S. Brown (Eds. ), Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 79-98). London: Academic Press.
Castaños, J. M., Morales, L. C., Tun, J. A., & Constantino, M. A. (2005, October). A coached Collaborative Learning Environment for Entity-Relationship Modeling: COLER, Poster Session presented at XXI Simposio Internacional de Computación en la Educación SOMECE 2005, Hermosillo, Sonora, México.
Constantino-González, M. A. (2000). A Computer Coach to Support Synchronous Computer-Mediated Collaborative Learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Monterrey Institute of Technology (ITESM) Campus Monterrey, Monterrey, N. L., México.
Constantino-González, M. A., & Suthers, D. D. (2000). A Coached Collaborative Learning Environment for Entity-Relationship Modeling. In G. Gauthier, C. Frasson, & K. VanLehn (Eds. ), Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference ITS-2000 (pp. 324-333). Berlín: Springer-Verlag.
Constantino-González, M. A., Suthers, D. D., & Icaza, J. (2001). Designing and Evaluating a Collaboration Coach: Knowledge and Reasoning. In J. D. Moore, C. L. Redfield, & W. L. Johnson (Eds. ). Artificial Intelligence in Education: AI-ED in the Wired and Wireless Future, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 176-187). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Constantino-González, M. A., & Suthers, D. D. (2001). Coaching Collaboration by Comparing Solutions and Tracking Participation. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings, & K. Hakkarainen (Eds. ) European Perspectives on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, Proceedings of the First European Conference on CSCL(pp. 173-180). Netherlands: Universiteit Maastricht.
Constantino-González, M. A., & Suthers, D. D. (2003). Automated Coaching of Collaboration based on Workspace Analysis: Evaluation and Implications for Future Learning Environments. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-36), January 6-9, Wakoloa, Hawaii (CD-ROM), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE).
Constantino-González, M. A., Suthers, D. D., & Escamilla, J. G. (2003). Coaching Web-based Collaborative Learning based on Problem Solution Differences and Participation. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13(2-4), 263-299.
Coronado-López, F. J. (2000). Diseño y desarrollo del módulo del profesor para COLER, Unpublished master’s thesis. Monterrey Institute of Technology (ITESM) Campus Monterrey, Monterrey, N. L. México.
Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Anderson, J. R. (1997). Intelligent tutoring systems. In M. G. Helander, T. K. Landauer, & P. Prabhu (Eds. ), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction (2nd ed., pp. 849-874). Amsterdan, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
Dimitracopoulou, A., & Petrou, A. (2005). Advanced collaborative distance learning systems for young students: Design issues and current trends on new cognitive and metacognitive tools, THEMES in Education International Journal.
Dolonen, J. A., Chen, W., & Mǿrch, A. I. Integrating software agents with FLE3. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning2003(CSCL 2003)(pp. 157-161). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Fesakis, G., Petrou, A., & Dimitracopoulou, A. (2004). Collaboration activity function: an interaction analysis tool for computer supported collaborative learning activities. Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2004), 196-200.
Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative Learning Enhances Critical Thinking, Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 22-30.
Gordon, A., & Hall, L. (1998). A Collaborative Learning Environment for Data Modeling. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Symposium Conference (pp. 158-162). Menlo Park, Calif.: AAAI Press.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning Together and Alone, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Les, J., Cumming, G., & Finch, S. (1999). Agent systems for diversity in human learning. In S. P. Lajioe, & M. Vivet (Eds. ) Artificial Intelligence in Education: Open Learning Environments: New Computer Technologies to Support Learning, Exploration and Collaboration: Proceedings of the AI-ED 99 Conference (pp. 13-20). Amsterdan: IOS Press.
McManus, M. M., & Aiken, R. M. (1995). Monitoring Computer Based Collaborative Problem Solving, Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 6(4), 308-336.
Muehlenbrock, M., & Hoppe, H. U. (1999). Computer supported interaction analysis of group problem solving. In C. Hoadley, & J. Roschelle (Eds. ) Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning CSCL-99 (pp. 398-405), Palo Alto, CA. December. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Okamoto, T., Inaba, A., & Hasaba, Y. (1995). The Intelligent Learning Support System on the Distributed Cooperative Environment. In J. Greer (Ed. ), Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in Education AI-ED’95, August, Washington, D. C., 588.
Petrou, A., & Dimitracopoulou, A. (2003). Is synchronous computer mediated collaborative problem solving ‘justified’ only when by distance? Teachers’ point of views and interventions with co-located groups during every day class activities. In H. U. Hoppe (Ed. ), Proceedings of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning Conference: Designing for Change in Networked Learning Environments, CSCL 2003, June, Bergen, Norway, 449-455.
Ram, S., & Ramesh, V. (1998). Collaborative Conceptual Schema Design: A Process Model and a Prototype System, ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 16(4), 347-371.
Senge, P. (1994). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, Currency Doubleday.
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative Learning (2nd ed. ). Allyn and Bacon.
Soller, A., Martinez, A., Jermann, P., & Muehlenbrock, M. (2005). From Mirroring to Guiding: A Review of State of the Art Technology for Supporting Collaborative Learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15, 261-290.
Suraweera, P., & Mitrovic, A. (2004). An Intelligent Tutoring System for Entity Relationship Modelling, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14(3-4), 375-417.
Suthers, D. D., & Jones, D. (1997). An Architecture for Intelligent Collaborative Educational Systems. In Proceedings of the 8th World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED’97), August, Kobe, 55-62.
Suthers, D. D. Toth, E. E., & Weiner, A. (1997). An integrated approach to implementing collaborative inquiry in the classroom. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL’97), Toronto, 272-279.
Suthers, D. (2005). Collaborative Knowledge Construction through Shared Representations. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawai’i International Conference on the System Sciences (HICSS-38), January, Waikoloa, Hawai’i(CD-ROM), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Constantino-González, M.d.l.Á., Suthers, D.D. (2007). An approach for coaching collaboration based on difference recognition and participation tracking. In: Hoppe, H.U., Ogata, H., Soller, A. (eds) The Role of Technology in CSCL. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, vol 9. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71136-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71136-2_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-71135-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-71136-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)