Skip to main content

Distance and Internet Banking

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Internet-related possibilities might reduce the importance of distance for economic activity. By using data from the Survey on Household Income and Wealth (SHIW) of the Bank of Italy, this chapter investigates the validity of this assertion for Internet banking. It shows that there is no support for the argument that isolated consumers use e-banking more intensively than their less-isolated counterparts. It also highlights that, compared to less isolated clients, geographically remote clients are more frequently supplied with a loan by their own bank and evaluate personal acquaintances as an important factor more intensively. Overall, these findings support the relevance of soft information in lending practices to families and family businesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that the IKD hypothesis has been variously labeled in the literature. Examples are the global village hypothesis, the death of distance hypothesis, the death of cities hypothesis, and the Internet-cities substitution hypothesis.

  2. 2.

    As noted by the ECB (1999, p. 14): “Internet banking is expected to have the highest future growth potential (…) it will expand considerably within the next two to three years.”

  3. 3.

    Interestingly, Kahn (2004) finds that the type of financial account that a consumer has with a bank is a significant predictor of online banking usage (see also Brevoort and Wolken 2009: Chapter 3, this Volume, and Section. 6.2 below).

  4. 4.

    The effect of information technology on financial service competition is analyzed in Hauswald and Marquez (2003).

  5. 5.

    On the north-south divide in Italian ITC endowment, see Bonaccorsi et al. (2006).

  6. 6.

    SHIW micro-data are publicly available at www.bancaditalia.it.

  7. 7.

    The special sections are considered quite demanding for the respondents and very expensive for the Bank of Italy. This explains why sometimes the questions included in a special section are posed only to a subset of the respondents. For instance, only 3,009 households are asked to respond to the Internet navigation question.

  8. 8.

    Our coefficient estimates are not sensitive, however, to weighting or not weighting the data.

  9. 9.

    I also replaced the dummy for the presence of children in the household with a variable indicating the number of children in the household, with no modification of the results.

  10. 10.

    Only 2,931 households (out of 3,009) provide this information.

  11. 11.

    A similar procedure is followed by Charlot and Duranton (2004).

  12. 12.

    As for the reasons why the IKD hypothesis does not work, our results could be consistent both with the Gaspar and Glaeser (1998) story, according to which the Internet is a complement to cities because it spurs face-to-face interactions, and the Sinai and Waldfogel (2004) argument, whereby the supply of Internet content is biased in favor of urban residents. Unfortunately, our data do not allow us to disentangle the relative merits of the two proposed explanations.

  13. 13.

    As before, controlling for traffic congestion does not modify the results.

  14. 14.

    The question was posed only to households in which the head of household was born in an even numbered year.

  15. 15.

    This result is interesting because, in principle, congestion costs (for instance, longer queuing) could be more significant in larger areas and thus counterbalance the advantage of having a closer bank branch. However, Table 6.6 shows that banking transactions are not slower in cities, and so congestion costs do not seem to be a reason for the failure of IKD hypothesis.

References

  • Berger A, Udell G. (1995) Small firms, commercial lines of credit, and collateral. Journal of Business 68:351–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger AN, Humphrey DB, Pulley LB (1996) Do consumers pay for one-stop banking? Evidence from an alternative revenue function. Journal of Banking and Finance. 20(9):1601–1621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlin M, Mester LJ (1999) Deposits and relationship lending. Review of Financial Studies 12(3):579–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bank for International Settlements (2003) Payment and settlement systems in selected countries. Bank for International Settlements, Basle

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonaccorsi A, Piscitello L, Rossi C (2006) The north-south divide in Italian ITC endowment. Spatial heterogeneity and spatial dependence. University of Pisa, Mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonaccorsi di Patti E, Gobbi G, Mistrulli E P (2004) The interaction between face-to-face and electronic delivery: the case of the Italian banking industry. Banca d’Italia, Economic Research Discussion Paper 508

    Google Scholar 

  • Booz-Allen and Hamilton, Inc. (1996), Consumer demand for Internet banking, Financial Services Group, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandolini A, Cannari L (1994) Methodological appendix: The Bank of Italy survey of household income and wealth. In: Ando A, Guiso L, Visco I (eds) Saving and the accumulation of wealth. Essays on Italian household and government saving behavior. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairncross F (1997) The death of distance. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlot S, Duranton G (2004) Communication externalities in cities. Journal of Urban Economics 56:581–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciccone A (2002) Agglomeration effects in Europe. European Economic Review 46:213–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrocher N (2006) Internet adoption in Italian banks: An empirical investigation. Research Policy 35:533–544

    Google Scholar 

  • European Central Bank (1999) The effects of technology on the EU banking system. European Central Bank, Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Central Bank (2002) Structural analysis of the EU banking sector. European Central Bank, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison G, Ellison FS (2005) Lessons about markets from the internet. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19(2):139–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Evanoff DD (1988) Branch banking and service accessibility. Journal of Money Credit and Banking 20(2):191–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman C, Goldfarb A, Greenstein S (2005) How did location affect adoption of the commercial Internet? Global village vs. urban leadership. Journal of Urban Economics 58(3):389--420

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaspar J, Glaeser EL (1998) Information technology and the future of cities. Journal of Urban Economics 43:136–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gehring T (1998) Competing markets. European Economic Review 42(2):277–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenstein S, Prince J (2006) The diffusion of Internet and the geography of the digital divide in the United States. NBER WP 12182

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauswald R, Marquez R (2003) Information technology and financial services competition. The Review of Financial Studies 16(3):921–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISTAT (2004) Le tecnologie dell'informazione e della comunicazione: disponibilità nelle famiglie e utilizzo degli individui. Roma

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimeniz E, Greenstein S (1998) The emerging internet retailing market as a nested diffusion process. International Journal of Innovation Management 2(3):281–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JP Morgan Securities Ltd. (2000) Online Finance Europe. London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn BS (2004) Consumer adoption of online banking: Does distance matter? University of California at Berkeley Working paper E04–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashyap A, Rajan AR, Stein J (2002) Banks as liquidity providers: An explanation for the co-existence of lending and deposit-taking. Journal of Finance 57(1):33–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolko J (2000) The death of cities? The death of distance? Evidence from the geography of commercial internet usage. In: Vogelsan I, Compaine BM (eds) The internet upheaval. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennickell AB, Kwast ML (1997) Who uses electronic banking? Results from the 1995 survey of consumer finances. Paper presented at Annual Meetings of the Western Economic Association, Seattle, Washington, July 1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills BF, Whitacre BE (2003) Understanding the non-metropolitan-metropolitan digital divide. Growth and Change 34(2):219–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulton B (1990) An illustration of a pitfall in estimating the effects of aggregate variables on micro unit. Review of Economics and Statistics 72:334–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naisbitt R (1995) The global paradox. Avon Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen MA (2004) Information: Hard and soft. Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen MA, Rajan RG (1994) The benefits of firm-creditor relationships: Evidence from small-business data. The Journal of Finance 49:3–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen MA, Rajan RG (2002) Does distance still matter? The information revolution in small business lending. The Journal of Finance LVII ( 6):2533–2570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam R (1993) Making democracy work: Civic tradition in modern Italy. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinai T, Waldfogel J (2004) Geography and the internet: Is the internet a substitute or a complement for cities? Journal of Urban Economics 56:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toffler A (1980) The third wave. Bantam Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldfogel J (2003) Preference externalities: An empirical study of who benefits whom in differentiated product markets. Rand Journal of Economics 34:557–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Giorgio Albareto, Guglielmo Barone, Luigi Cannari, and Massimo Omiccioli. I am grateful to Diego Caprara and Christine Stone for their editorial assistance. The usual disclaimers apply.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guido de Blasio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix: Description of the Dependent Variables

Table 7

Appendix: Description of the City Size Measures and Main Control Variables

Table 8

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Blasio, G. (2009). Distance and Internet Banking. In: Zazzaro, A., Fratianni, M., Alessandrini, P. (eds) The Changing Geography of Banking and Finance. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98078-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics