Abstract
This chapter provides multiple perspectives on the intricate relations between argumentation and learning. Different approaches to learning impinge on the way argumentation is conceived of: as a powerful vehicle for reaching shared understanding, as a set of skills pertaining to critical reasoning, or as a tool for social positioning. Each perspective has harvested empirical studies that have stressed the importance of argumentation in learning. Methodological tools that fit the respective perspectives are reviewed. In spite of the pluralistic stance adopted, this chapter attempts to draw connections between the findings obtained in the different perspectives. In a separate part, it considers the specific role of argumentation in learning processes and outcomes for four subjects areas: in mathematics, studies are presented that show deep gaps between argumentation and proof. In science, experimental studies are reviewed to examine whether and how argumentation promotes conceptual change. In history, the chapter considers the role of argumentation in challenging narratives and in claiming a position. At last, we describe the new wave that characterizes civic education programs towards the instillation of argumentative practices in democratic citizenship.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aberdein, A. (2006). The informal logic of mathematical proof. In R. Hersh (Ed.), Unconventional Essays on the Nature of Mathematics (pp. 56–70). New York: Springer.
Alexopoulou, E., Driver, R. (1997). Small group discussions in physics: peer interaction modes in pairs and fours. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(10), 1099c1114.
Andriessen, J., Baker, M., Suthers, D. (Eds.) (2003). Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning environments. Dordecht: Kluwer.
Antaki, C. (1994). Explaining and arguing – The social organization of accounts. London: Sage Publications.
Asterhan, C.S.C., Schwarz, B.B. (2007). The effects of dialogical and monological argumentation on concept learning in evolutionary theory. The Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 626–639.
Atzmon, S., Hershkowitz, R., Schwarz, B.B. (2006). The role of teachers in turning claims to arguments. In J. Novotna (Ed.), Proceedings of the 30th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 5, pp. 65–72). Prague.
Baker, M. (1999) Argumentative interactions, discursive operations, and learning to model in science. In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Baker, M. (2003). Computer-mediated interactions for the co-elaboration of scientific notions. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments. Utrecht: Kluwer.
Billig, M. (1996). Arguing and Thinking. A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology (2nd Ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boulter, C.J., Gilbert, J.K. (1995). Argument and science education. In P. S. M. Costello and S. Mitchell (Eds.), Competing and Consensual Voices: The theory and Practice of Argumentation. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Bruner, J. (1982). The formats of language acquisition. American Journal of Semiotics, 1, 1–16.
Chi, M.T.H. (2000). Self-explaining expository texts: The dual process of generating inferences and repairing mental models. In Glaser, R. (Ed), Advances in Instructional Psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Chi, M.T.H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M.W., Reimann, P., Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145–182.
Chi, M.T.H., DeLeeuw, N., Chiu, M., Lavancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439–477.
Chinn, C.A., Brewer, W.F. (1998). An empirical test of a taxonomy of responses to anomalous data in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 623–654.
Cobb, P., Stephan, M., McClain, K., Gravemeijer, K. (2001). Participating in classroom mathematical practices. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(1&2), 113–164.
Dawes, L., Mercer, N., Wegerif, R. (2000). Thinking Together: A Programme of Activities for Developing Thinking Skills at KS2. Birmingham: Questions Publishing.
de Vries, E., Lund, K., Baker, M. (2002). Computer-mediated epistemic dialogue: Explanation and argumentation as vehicles for understanding scientific notions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, 63–103.
Douek, N. (1999). Argumentation and conceptualization in context: A case study on sunshadows in primary school. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39, 89–110.
Driver, R., Newton, P., Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287–312.
Druker, S.L., Chen, C., Kelly, G.J. (1996). Introducing content to the Toulmin model of argumentation via error analysis. Paper presented at NARST meeting, Chicago, IL.
Duval, R. (1991). Structure du raisonnement déductif et apprentissage de la démonstration. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 233–261.
Eisenberg, A., Garvey, C. (1981). Children’s use of verbal strategies in resolving conflicts. Discourse Processes, 4, 149–170.
Ferro, M. (1984). The use and abuse of history, or, how the past is taught. London: Routledge.
Fischbein, E., Kedem, I. (1982). Proof and Certitude in the Development of Mathematical Thinking. In A. Vermandel (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 128–31). Universitaire Instelling Antwerpen.
Funkenstein, A. (1989). Collective memory and historical consciousness. History and Memory, 1(1), 5–26.
Galston, W. (1995). Liberal virtues and the formation of civic character. In M. A. Glendon and D. Blankenhorn (Eds.), Seedbeds of virtue. New York: Madison books.
Glassner, A., Schwarz, B.B. (2005). The Antilogos ability to evaluate information supporting arguments. Learning and Instruction, 15, 353–375.
Goldberg, T., Schwarz, B.B., Porat, D. (2008). Living and dormant collective memories as contexts of history learning. Learning and Instruction, 18(3), 223–237.
Gravemeijer, K. (1994). Educational development and developmental research. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 443–475.
Greeno, J.G. (1997). On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educational Researcher, 26(1), 5–17.
Hadas, N., Hershkowitz, R., Schwarz, B.B. (2002). Between Task Design and Students’ Explanations in Geometrical Activities. Canadian Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 2(4), 529–552.
Hanson, N.R. (1958). Patterns of discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Herrenkohl, L.R., Guerra, M.R. (1995). Where did you find your theory in your findings? Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade. Paper presented at AERA annual meeting.
Hershkowitz , R. , Schwarz , B.B. (1999) . Reflective processes in a technology-based mathematics classroom . Cognition and Instruction, 17 , 66–91.
Hogan, K., & Maglienti, M. (2001). Comparing the epistemological underpinnings of students' and scientists' reasoning about conclusions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 38(6), 663–687.
Hogan, K., & Maglienti, M. (2001). Comparing the epistemological underpinnings of students’ and scientists’ reasoning about conclusions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), 663–687.
Hoyles, C., & Kücheman, D. (2002). Students’ understanding of logical implication. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 51(3), 193–223.
Hynd, C.R. (1999). Teaching students to think critically using multiple texts in history. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 42(6), 428–436.
Inglis, M., Mejia-Ramos J.P., Simpson, A. (2007). Modelling mathematical argumentation: The importance of qualification. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 3–21.
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M., Bugallo Rodriguez, A., Duschl, R. (2000). “Doing the lesson” or “Doing science”: Argument in High School Genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757–792.
Kruger, A.C. (1993). Peer collaboration: conflict, cooperation or both? Social Development, 2, 165–182.
Krummheuer, G. (1995). The ethnography of argumentation. In P. Cobb and H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The Emergence of Mathematical Meaning: Interaction in Classroom Cultures (pp. 229–269). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, D. (1991). The Skills of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kuhn, D. (1992). Thinking as argument. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 155–178.
Kuhn, D. (1996). Is good thinking scientific thinking? In D. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), Modes of thought: Explorations in culture and cognition (pp. 261–281). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kuhn, D. (2001). How do people know. Psychological Science, 12, 1–8.
Kuhn, D., Shaw, V., Felton, M. (1997). Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentative reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 287–315.
Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and Refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Leitão, S. (2000). The potential of argument in knowledge building. Human Development, 43, 332–360.
Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in Education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mani-Ikan, E. (2000). Writing as a tool for learning biology: A model for learning biology through writing skills. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hebrew university of Jerusalem: Jerusalem.
Maynard, D. (1985). How students start arguments. Language in Society, 14, 1–29.
Means, M.L., & Voss, J.F. (1996). Who reasons well? Two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade, ability, and knowledge levels. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 139–179.
Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge. Talk amongst teachers and learners. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual matters.
Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Dawes, L. (1999). Children’s talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 95–111.
Miller, M. (1987). Argumentation and Cognition. In M. Hickman (Ed.), Social and functional approaches to language and thought. San Diego, CA: Academic.
Millar, R. and Osborne, J. (1998) Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: King’s College London.
Minstrell, J. & van Zee, E.H. (Eds.) Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science. Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Mortimer, E. and Scott, P. (2003). Meaning Making in Secondary Science Classrooms, Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Nash, G.B., & Dunn, R.E. (1995). History standards and culture wars. Social Education, 59(1), 5–7.
Naveh, E., & Yogev, E. (2002). Histories: Towards a Dialog with Yesterday. (Hebrew) Tel-Aviv, Israel: Bavel.
Neuman, Y., & Schwarz, B.B. (1998). Is self-explanation while solving problems helpful? The case of analogical problem solving. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 15–24.
Neuman, Y., & Schwarz, B.B. (2000). Substituting one mystery for another: The role of self-explanations in solving algebra word-problems. Learning and Instruction, 10, 203–220.
Nickerson, R. (1986). Reflections on reasoning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Norris, S.P. & Phillips, L.M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224–240.
Osborne, J. Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020.
Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1958). Traité de l’argumentation: La nouvelle réthorique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Perfetti, C.A., Britt, M., Rouet, J.F., Georgi, M.C., Mason, R.A. (1994). How students use texts to learn and reason about historical uncertainty. In J. F. Voss and M. Carretero (Eds), Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social sciences (pp. 257–283). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pólyà (1945). How to Solve It. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Pólyà, G. (1954). Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning (vol. I, Induction and Analogy in Mathematics, and vol. II, Patterns of Plausible Inference). Princeton University Press.
Pontecorvo, C. (1987). Discussing for reasoning: The role of argument in knowledge construction. In E. De Corte, H. Lodewijks, R. Parmentier, P. Span (Eds.), Learning and Instruction: A Publication of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (vol. 1, pp. 71–82). Oxford: EARLI.
Pontecorvo, C., & Girardet, H. (1993). Arguing and reasoning in understanding historical topics. Cognition and Instruction, 11, 365–395.
Resnick, L.B., Salmon, M., Zeitz, C.M., Wathen, S.H., Holowchak, M. (1993). Reasoning in conversation. Cognition and Instruction, 11, 347–364.
Richmond, G., & Striley, J. (1996). Making meaning in classrooms: Social processes in small group discourse and scientific knowledge building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), 839–858.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rogoff, B. (1993). Children’s guided participation and participatory appropriation in sociocultural activity. In R. Woxniak & K. Fischer (Eds.), Development in context: Acting and thinking in specific environments (pp. 121–153). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rogoff, B. (1998). Cognition as a collaborative process. In W. Damon (Series Ed) and D. Kuhn (Vol Ed), Handbook of Child Psychology, vol. 4, 5th Ed (679–744). NewYork: Wiley.
Sandoval, W.A. (2003). Conceptual and epistemic aspects of students’ scientific explanations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 5–51.
Sandoval, W.A., & Millwood, K.A. (2005). The quality of students’ use of evidence in written scientific explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), 23–55.
Schoenfeld, A.H. (1986). On Having and Using Geometric Knowledge. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge: The Case of Mathematics (pp. 225–64). Hillsdale, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schwarz, B.B. (2003). Collective reading of multiple texts in argumentative activities. The International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 133–151.
Schwarz, B.B., & Glassner, A. (2003). The blind and the paralytic: Supporting argumentation in everyday and scientific issues. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (pp. 227–260). Utrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Schwarz, B.B., & Linchevski, L. (2007). The role of task design and of argumentation in cognitive development during peer interaction. The case of proportional reasoning. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 310–331.
Schwarz, B.B., Neuman, Y., Biezuner, S. (2000). Two wrongs may make a right…if they argue together. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 461–494.
Schwarz, B.B., Neuman, Y., Gil, J., Ilya, M. (2003). Construction of collective and individual knowledge in argumentative activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 221–258.
Schwarz, B.B. (2008). Escalate: The White Book. www.escalate.org.il
Schwarz, B.B., Perret-Clermont, A-N., Trognon, A., Marro, P. (2008). Learning processes within and between successive activities in a laboratory context. Pragmatics and Cognition, 16(1), 57–87.
Siegel , H. (1989) . The rationality of science, critical thinking and science education . Synthese , 80 (1) , 9–42
Simon, S. Erduran, S. & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2-3), 235–260
Stein, N.L., & Miller, C.A. (1991). I win – You lose: The development of argumentative thinking. In J.F. Voss, D.N. Perkins, J. Segal (Eds.), Informal Reasoning and Instruction (pp. 265–290). Hillsdale, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Stein, N.L., & Miller, C.A. (1993). A theory of argumentative understanding: Relationships among position preference, judgments of goodness, memory and reasoning. Argumentation, 7(2), 183–204.
Stein, N.L., & Trabasso, T. (1985). Children’s understanding of stories: a basis for moral jusgment and dilemma resolution. In C. Biainerd and M. Pressley (Eds.), Verbal Processes in Children: Progress in Cognitive Development Research (pp. 161–188). New York: Springer.
Taylor, C. (1996). Doing Science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Teasley, S.D. (1995). The role of talk in children’s peer collaborations. Developmental Psychology, 31, 207–220.
Tessler, M., & Nelson, K. (1994). Making memories: The influence of joint encoding on later recall. Consciousness and Cognition, 3, 307–326.
Tetlock, P. (1992). The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 25). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Toulmin, S. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Trognon, A. (1999). Eléments d’analyse interlocutoire. In M. Gilly, J-P. Roux and A. Trognon (Eds.), Apprendre dans l’interaction (pp. 69–94). Presses Universitaires de Nancy.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology. New York: Sharpe.
Wegerif, R., Mercer, N., & Dawes, L. (1999). From social interaction to individual reasoning: an empirical investigation of a possible socio-cultural model of cognitive development. Learning and Instruction, 9(5), 493–516.
Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts: Charting the Future of Teaching the Past. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Williams, J.M., & Tolmie, A. (2000). Conceptual change in biology: Group interaction and the understanding of inheritance. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19, 625–649.
Woolgar, S. (1988). Science: The very idea. Chichester, UK: Ellis Horwood.
Yackel, E. (2002). What we can learn from analyzing the teacher’s role in collective argumentation. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21, 423–440.
Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation and autonomy in mathematics. The Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458–477.
Zeidler, D.L. (1997). The central role of fallacious thinking in science education. Science Education, 81, 483–496.
Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 35–62.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schwarz, B.B. (2009). Argumentation and Learning. In: Muller Mirza, N., Perret-Clermont, AN. (eds) Argumentation and Education. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98125-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98125-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-98124-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-98125-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)