Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Statistics for Industry and Technology ((SIT))

Abstract

The linear hazard regression model developed by Aalen is becoming an increasingly popular alternative to the Cox multiplicative hazard regression model. There are no methods in the literature for selecting among different candidate models of this nonparametric type, however. In the present chapter a focused information criterion is developed for this task. The criterion works for each specified covariate vector, by estimating the mean squared error for each candidate model’s estimate of the associated cumulative hazard rate; the finally selected model is the one with lowest estimated mean squared error. Averaged versions of the criterion are also developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aalen, O. O. (1980). A model for nonparametric regression analysis of counting processes, In Mathematical Statistics and Probability Theory (Eds., W. Klonecki, A. Kozek, and J. Rosinski). Proceedings of the 6th International Conference, Wisla, Poland, pp. 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andersen, P. K., Borgan, Ø., Gill, R., and Keiding, N. (1993). Statistical Models Based on Counting Processes, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Claeskens, G. and Hjort, N. L. (2003). The focused information criterion [with discussion], Journal of the American Statistical Association, 98, 900–916 and 938–945.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Claeskens, G. and Hjort, N. L. (2008). Minimising average risk in regression models, Econometric Theory, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hjort, N. L. and Claeskens, G. (2003). Frequentist average estimators [with discussion], Journal of the American Statistical Association, 98, 879–899 and 938–945.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Hjort, N. L. and Claeskens, G. (2006). Focused information criteria and model averaging for the Cox hazard regression model, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101, 1449–1464.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Huffer, F. and McKeague, I. W. (1991). Weighted least squares estimation for Aalen’s additive risk model, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86, 114–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McKeague, I. W. and Sasieni, P. D. (1994). A partly parametric additive risk model, Biometrika, 81, 501–514.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Martinussen, T. and Scheike, T. H. (2006). Dynamic Regression Models for Survival Data, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Birkhäuser Boston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hjort, N.L. (2008). Focused Information Criteria for the Linear Hazard Regression Model. In: Vonta, F., Nikulin, M., Limnios, N., Huber-Carol, C. (eds) Statistical Models and Methods for Biomedical and Technical Systems. Statistics for Industry and Technology. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-4619-6_34

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics