Skip to main content

The Class Position of Goffman’s Sociology: Social Origins of an American Structuralism

  • Chapter
The View from Goffman

Abstract

All social theory is class-based. Any theoretical system or problematic expresses the imaginary relation of a class or class-fragment to the real relations of production that characterise a social formation in a particular historical conjuncture. The sociology it produces contains, in a form stamped by its class position and more or lass transfigured or obscure, a semblance of the structures and processes constituted by each of the levels of the social formation — the economic system, the political system, and the cultural-ideological system — and of the personality system of its agent (‘theorist’), each of which exercises some determination on the theoretical system.1 As an imaginary construction, a theoretical system enjoys a certain degree of autonomy from its material base such that it can reflect earlier or anticipated later stages in the history of the social formation.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Chapter Endnotes

  1. This paradigm for the study of theoretical systems is formulated from the structural approaches of Louis Althusser, For Marx, ( New York; Vintage Books, 1970 )

    Google Scholar 

  2. Louis Althusser, Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, ( New York; Monthly Review Press, 1971 )

    Google Scholar 

  3. Talcott Parsons, The System of Modern Societies, ( Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey; Prentice-Hall, 1971 )

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nicos Poulantzas, Classes in Contemporary Capitalism, (London; New Left Books,1975)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alvin W. Gouldner, The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology, ( New York; Avon Books, 1970 ) pp. 378–90.

    Google Scholar 

  6. As between the goods-producing and ‘service’ sectors, see Daniel Bell, The Coming of Post-Industrial Society, (New York; Basic Books, 1973): The great divide began in 1947, after World War II. At that time the employment was evenly balanced. From 1947 to 1968 there was a growth of about 6o percent in employment in services, while employment in the goods-producing industries increased less than to percent. (p. 130).

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. Wright Mills, White Collar: The American Middle Classes, (New York; Oxford University Press, 1951) p. xx.

    Google Scholar 

  8. David Riesman, The Lonely Crowd: A study of the Changing American Character, (New Haven, Connecticut; Yale University Press, 1950); Mills, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  9. William H. Whyte, The Organisation Man, (New York; Simon and Schuster, 1956).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Luc Boltanski, ‘Trying Goffman et le temps du soupçon’, Information sur les Sciences Sociales, Volume 12, No. 3, (1973) pp. 127–47, esp. pp. 143–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bell, op. cit., p. 127; and Harry Braverman, Labor and Monopoly Capital, ( New York: Monthly Review Press, 1974 ) p. 326.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See, Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis, Schooling in Capitalist America, (New York; Basic Books, 1976) Chapter 5; and Poulantzas, op. cit., pp. 258–9.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Daniel Bell, ‘Crime as an American Way of Life: A Queer Ladder of Social Mobility’, in The End of Ideology, (New York; Free Press, 1960), explains how, in the 1940s, organised crime, like capitalism itself, shifted its focus from production (industrial racketeering) to consumption, i.e., the direct exploitation of the citizen as consumer.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See, for example, George Psathas, ‘Goffman’s Image of Man’, Humanity and Society, Volume 1, No. 1, (1977) pp. 84–94

    Google Scholar 

  15. John Dewey, Individualism Old and New, ( New York; Minton, 1929 ) p. 146.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cooley, quoted in Lewis A. Coser, Masters in Sociological Thought, ( New York; Harcourt-Brace-Janovich; 1971 ) p. 306.

    Google Scholar 

  17. CharlesHorton Cooley, Human Nature and the Social Order, ( New York; Schocken Books, 1964 ) p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  18. For a discussion of the question of legality or illegality of practice and its relation to theory, see Georg Lukacs, History and Class Consciousness, (Cambridge, Massachusetts; M.I.T. Press, 1971 ).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Jason Ditton

Copyright information

© 1980 George Gonos

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gonos, G. (1980). The Class Position of Goffman’s Sociology: Social Origins of an American Structuralism. In: Ditton, J. (eds) The View from Goffman. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16268-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics