Abstract
Contemporary world politics is a matter of wealth and poverty, life and death. The members of this Association have chosen to study it because it is so important to our lives and those of other — not because it is either aesthetically attractive or amenable to successful theory-formulation and testing. Indeed, we would be foolish if we studied world politics in search of beauty or lasting truth. Beauty is absent because much that we observe is horrible, and many of the issues that we study involve dilemmas whose contemplation no sane person would find pleasing. Deterministic laws elude us, since we are studying the purposive behavior of relatively small numbers of actors engaged in strategic bargaining. In situations involving strategic bargaining, even formal theories, with highly restrictive assumptions, fail to specify which of many possible equilibrium outcomes will emerge.1 This suggests that no general theory of international politics may be feasible. It makes sense to seek to develop cumulative verifiable knowledge, but we must understand that we can aspire only to formulate conditional, context-specific generalizations rather than to discover universal laws, and that our understanding of world politics will always be incomplete.
International Studies Quarterly, 32(4) (December), pp. 379–396. Author’s note: This essay was written while the author was a fellow at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, 1987–88. I am grateful for financial support to the Social Science Research Council Foreign Policy Program and to National Science Foundation grant #BNS-8700864 to the Center. My colleagues in the institutional theory seminar at the Center provided inspiration, advice, and literature references; and helpful comments on earlier drafts were received from James A. Caporaso, Glenn Carroll, Lawrence Finkelstein, Ernst B. Haas, Peter J. Katzenstein, Nannerl O. Keohane, John Kingdon, Stephen D. Krasner, Douglass C. North, Claus Offe, John Gerard Ruggic, Barry Weingast, and two editors of International Studies Quarterly, Richard K. Ashley and Patrick McGowan.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Kreps, D. M. (1984) ‘Corporate Culture and Economic Theory’, Manuscript. Stanford, Calif.: Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, p. 16.
Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press
Haas, E. B. (1986) ‘Progress and International Relations’, Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, manuscript.
Holsti, K. J. (1986) ‘The Horsemen of the Apocalypse: At the Gate, Detoured or Retreating?’, International Studies Quarterly 30, 355–72.
Keohane, R. (1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bull, H. (1977) The Anarchical Society, New York: Columbia University Press, p. 98.
Hoffmann, S. (1987) ‘Hans Morgenthau: The Limits and Influence of “Realism”’, in Janus and Minerva: Essays in the Theory and Practice of International Politics, edited by S. Hoffmann, pp. 70–81. Boulder: Westview, p. 74.
Simon, H. A. (1985) ‘Human Nature in Politics: The Dialogue of Psychology with Political Science’, American Political Science Review 79:293–304.
Axelrod, R. (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation, New York: Basic Books. Keohane, R. O. (1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton: Princeton University Press
Oye, K. A. ed. (1986) Cooperation under Anarchy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Barry, B. (1970) Sociologists, Economists and Democracy, London: Macmillan
Gilpin, R. (1981) War and Change in World Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kratochwil, F. and J. G. Ruggie. (1986) ‘International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State’, International Organization 40, 753–76, p. 765.
Hughes, E. C. (1936) ‘The Ecological Aspect of Instiuttions’, American Sociological Review 1, 180–86, quoted in Zucker, L. G. (1977) ‘The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence’ American Sociological Review 42, p. 726.
Ruggie, J. G. (1986) ‘Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Toward a Neorealist Synthesis’, in Neorealism and Its Critics, edited by R. O. Keohane, pp. 131–57 (New York: Columbia University Press, p. 147.
Krasner, S. D. (1987) ‘Sovereignty: An Institutional Perspective’. Manuscript. Stanford, Calif.: Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, October.
Keohane, R. O. (1986) ‘Reciprocity in International Relations’, International Organization 40, 1–27.
North, D. C. (1987) ‘Institutions and Economic Growth: An Historical Introduction’. Paper prepared for the Conference on Knowledge and Institutional Change sponsored by the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, November, p. 6.
March, J. and J. Olson (1984) ‘The New Institutionalism; Organizational Factors in Political Life’, American Political Science Review 79, p. 741.
Rawls, J. (1955) ‘Two Concepts of Rules’, Philosophical Review 64, p. 19 Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Young, O. R. (1986) ‘International Regimes: Toward A New Theory of Institutions’, World Politics 39, p. 120.
These practices have evolved over the course of decades or centuries and can therefore be considered in Young’s terminology to be spontaneous order: ‘the product of the action of many men but … not the result of human design’ (Young, O. R. (1983) ‘Regime Dynamics: The Rise and Fall of International Regimes’, in International Regimes, edited by S. D. Krasner, pp. 93–114, Ithaca: Cornell University Press quoting Hayek, F. A. (1973) Rules and Order. Vol. 1 of Law, Legislation and Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press), p. 98.
Morgenthau, H. J. (1940) ‘Positivism, Functionalism and International Law’, American Journal of International Law 34, p. 279. Morgenthau’s language is remarkably close to the language of transaction costs employed by rationalistic theorists discussed in the next section.
McIlwain (Constitutionalism and the Changing World. New York: Macmillan; and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1939)
James (Sovereign Statehood. London: Allen and Unwin, 1986)
(Waltz, Theory of International Politics, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley 1979, p. 96).
Wight, M. (1977) Systems of States, edited with an introduction by H. Bull. Leicester: Leicester University Press, p. 135.
North, D. C. (1984) ‘Government and the Cost of Exchange in History’, Journal of Economic History 44, p. 256.
North, D. C. (1981) Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: W. W. Norton
Williamson, O. E. (1981) ‘The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution, Attributes’, Journal of Economic Literature 19, pp. 1537–68
Williamson, O. E. (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: Free Press
Keohane, After Hegemony Moe, T. M. (1987) ‘Interests, Institutions and Positive Theory: The Politics of the NLRB’, Studies in American Political Development 2, pp. 236–99
Finlayson, J. A. and M. W. Zacher (1983) ‘The Gatt and the Regulation of Trade Barriers: Regime Dynamics and Functions’, in International Regimes, edited by S. D. Krasner, pp. 273–315, Ithaca: Cornell University Press
Keohane, After Hegemony, Chapter 10; Aggarwal, V. K., Liberal Protectionism: The International Politics of Organized Textile Trade. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985
Lipson, C. (1986) ‘Banker’s Dilemmas: Private Cooperation in Rescheduling Sovereign Debts’, in Cooperation under Anarchy, edited by K. Oye, pp. 200–25. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Haggard, S. and B. A. Simmons. (1987) ‘Theories of International Regimes’, International Organization 41, pp. 491–517
Krasner, S. D. (1985) Structural Conflict: The Third World against Global Liberalism, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kreps, D. and R. Wilson (1982) ‘Reputation and Imperfect Liformation’, Journal of Economic Theory 27, pp. 253–79
Eichengreen, B. (1987) ‘Till Debt Do Us Part: The U.S. Capital Market and Foreign Lending, 1920–1955’, Cambridge: NBER Working Paper no. 2394 (October)
Lindert, P. H. and P. J. Morton (1987) ‘How Sovereign Debt Has Worked’, University of California, Davis, Institute of Governmental Affairs, Research Program in Applied Macroeconomics and Macro Policy, Working Paper series no. 45, August.
Wendt, A. E. (1987) ‘The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory’, International Organization 41, p. 368.
Shepsle, K. (1986) ‘Institutional Equilibrium and Equilibrium Institutions’, in Political Science: The Science of Politics, edited by H. F. Weisberg, pp. 51–81, New York: Agathon Press.
Moe, T. M. (1984) ‘The New Economics of Organization’, American Journal of Political Science 28:739–77
Arrow, K. J. (1985) ‘The Economics of Agency’, in Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business, J. W. Pratt and R. J. Zeckhauser (eds.) pp. 37–51, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Axelrod, R. (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation
Axelrod, R. (1986) ‘An Evolutionary Approach to Norms’, American Political Science Review 80, pp. 1095–1111
Sutton, B. A. and M. W. Zacher (1987) ‘The Calculus and Conditions of International Collaboration: Evolution of the International Shipping Regime’, prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, September.
Some work by sociologists, although not applied to international relations, seems relevant here since it focuses on the role played by professional and personal networks in facilitating social cooperation. See Dore R. (1983) ‘Goodwill and the Spirit of Market Capitalism’, British Journal of Sociology 34, pp. 459–82, Granovetter, M. (1985) ‘Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology 91, pp. 481–510, and Powell, W. W. (1987) ‘Hybrid Organizational Arrangements: New Form or Transitional Development?’ California Management Review 30, pp. 67–87
David, P. A. (1985) ‘Clio and the Economics of QWERTY’, American Economic Review Proceedings 75, pp. 332–37
Arthur, W. B., Y. M. Ermoliev and Y. M. Kaniovski (1987) ‘Path-Dependent Processes and the Emergence of Macro-Structure’, European Journal of Operational Research, 30:294–303; March and Olson, ‘The New Constitutionalism,’ p. 745.
Stinchcombe, A. L. (1968) Constructing Social Theories, New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
Field, A. J. (1981) ‘The Problem with Neoclassical Institutional Economics: A Critique with Special Reference to the North/Thomas model of pre-1500 Europe’, Explorations in Economic History 18:174–98.
Hirschman, A. D. (1970) ‘The Search for Paradigms as a Hindrance to Understanding’, World Politics 22(3), pp. 329–43.
Alker, H. R. Jr. (1986) ‘The Presumption of Anarchy in World Politics’, draft manuscript, Department of Political Science, MIT, August.
Haas, E. B. (1987) ‘Adaptation and Learning in International Organizations’, Manuscript. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies.
Cox, R. W. (1986) ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’, in Neorealism and Its Critics, edited by R. O. Keohane, pp. 204–55, New York: Columbia University Press, p. 223.
Ashley, R. K. (1986) ‘The Poverty of Neorealism’, in Neorealism and Its Critics, edited by R. O. Keohane, New York: Columbia University Press, p. 290
Alker, ‘The Presumption of Anarclry’ Kratochwil, F. (1986) ‘Of Systems, Boundaries and Territoriality: An Inquiry into the Formation of the State System’, World Politics 39, pp. 27–52
Alker, H. R. Jr. (1985) ‘From Quantity to Quality: A New Research Program on Resolving Sequential Prisoner’s Dilemmas’, paper delivered at the August meeting of the American Political Science Association.
Putnam, R. D. (1988) ‘Diplomacy and Domestic Politics; The Logic of Two-Level Games’, International Organization 42, pp. 427–60
Recently major work has been done on links between domestic and international politics, by scholars trained in comparative politics. Unlike the critics of rationalistic theory discussed above, however, these writers emphasize international structure, material interests, and state organization as well as the role of ideas and social patterns of learning. Also unlike the critics of rationalist international relations theory, these writers have engaged in extensive and detailed empirical research. See Zysman, J. Governments, Markets and Growth (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1983), Katzenstein, P. J. Small States in World Markets (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985), Gourevitch, P. A. ‘The Second Image Reversed: International Sources of Domestic Politics’ International Organization 32, pp. 881–912, (1978); Politics in Hard Times (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1986), and Alt, J. A. ‘Crude Politics: Oil and the Political Economy of Unemployment in Britain and Norway, 1970–85,’ British Journal of Political Science 17, pp. 149–99
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1995 International Studies Quarterly
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Keohane, R. (1995). International Institutions: Two Approaches (1988). In: Der Derian, J. (eds) International Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23773-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23773-9_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-61761-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-23773-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)