Definition
Perception of natural hazards and disasters involves intuitive judgments, beliefs, and attitudes adopted by individuals and groups of people about the likelihood of occurrence and course and mechanisms of development of such phenomena. The subjective nature of the understanding of natural hazards influences people’s decisions.
Discussion
Risk perception is influenced by many factors, which are, firstly, related to the nature of the hazard itself, and, secondly, to psychological, social, and cultural components and their mutual interactions. In the case of natural hazards, risk perception analysis has to take into account that they vary immensely from sudden events such as flash floods, avalanches, or earthquakes to long lasting phenomena such as heat waves or droughts. Most comparative studies focus on human-induced dangers, whereas risk perception of natural hazards has been researched less often. It is somehow consistent with the fact, that people are usually much less...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Bell, P. A., Greene, T., Fisher, J., and Baum, A. S., 2005. Environmental Psychology. Orlando: Harcourt College.
Biernacki, W., Bokwa, A., Domański, B., Działek, J., Janas, K., and Padło, T., 2008. Mass media as a source of information about extreme natural phenomena in Southern Poland. In Carvalho, A. (ed.), Communicating Climate Change: Discourses, Mediations and Perceptions. Braga: Centro de Estudos de Comunicação e Sociedade, Universidade do Minho, pp. 190–200. Available from: http://www.lasics.uminho.pt/ojs/index.php/climate_change.
Breakwell, G. M., 2007. The Psychology of Risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burton, I., Kates, R. W., and White, G. F., 1993. The Environment as Hazard. New York: Guilford Press.
Covello, V. T., 1991. Risk comparison and risk communication: issues and problems in comparing health and environmental risk. In Kasperson, R. E., and Stallen, P. J. M. (eds.), Communicating Risks to the Public. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 79–118.
Finucane, M. L., Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K., Flynn, J., and Satterfield, T. A., 2000. Gender, race, and perceived risk: the “white male” effect. Health, Risk and Society, 2(2), 159–172.
Fischer, G. W., Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., Nair, I., and Lave, L. B., 1991. What risks are people concerned about? Risk Analysis, 11(2), 303–314.
Gustafson, P. E., 1998. Gender differences in risk perception: theoretical and methodological perspectives. Risk Analysis, 18(6), 805–811.
Lin, S., Shaw, D., and Ho, M.-C., 2008. Why are flood and landslide victims less willing to take mitigation measures than the public? Natural Hazards, 44(2), 305–314.
McAdoo, B. G., Moore, A., and Baumwoll, J., 2009. Indigenous knowledge and the near field population response during the 2007 Solomon Islands tsunami. Natural Hazards, 48(1), 73–82.
McClure, J., Walkey, F., and Allen, M., 1999. When earthquake damage is seen as preventable: attributions, locus of control and attitudes to risk. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48, 239–256.
Raaijmakers, R., Krywkow, J., and van der Veen, A., 2008. Flood risk perceptions and spatial multi-criteria analysis: an exploratory research for hazard mitigation. Natural Hazards, 46, 307–322.
Renn, O., 2008. Risk Governance. Coping with uncertainty in a complex world. London: Earthscan.
Shaw, R., Uy, N., and Baumwoll, J. (eds.), 2008. Indigenous Knowledge for Disaster Reduction: Good Practices and Lessons Learned from Experiences in the Asia-Pacific Region. Bangkok: United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. Available from www.unisdr.org/eng/about_isdr/isdr-publications/19-Indigenous_Knowledge-DRR/Indigenous_Knowledge-DRR.pdf.
Slovic, P., 2000. The Perception of Risk. London: Earthscan.
Smith, K., 2001. Environmental Hazards: Assessing Risk and Reducing Disaster. London/New York: Routledge.
Tobin, G. A., and Burrel, E. M., 1997. Natural Hazards: Explanation and Integration. New York: Guilford Press.
Wachinger, G., Renn, O., 2010. Risk perception and natural hazards. CapHaz-Net WP3 report. Stuttgart: DIALOGIK. Available from: http://caphaz-net.org/outcomes-results
White, G. F. (ed.), 1974. Natural Hazards: Local, National, Global. New York: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this entry
Cite this entry
Dzialek, J. (2013). Perception of Natural Hazards and Disasters. In: Bobrowsky, P.T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Natural Hazards. Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4399-4_265
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4399-4_265
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8699-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4399-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences