Skip to main content

Perception of Natural Hazards and Disasters

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Natural Hazards

Part of the book series: Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series ((EESS))

Definition

Perception of natural hazards and disasters involves intuitive judgments, beliefs, and attitudes adopted by individuals and groups of people about the likelihood of occurrence and course and mechanisms of development of such phenomena. The subjective nature of the understanding of natural hazards influences people’s decisions.

Discussion

Risk perception is influenced by many factors, which are, firstly, related to the nature of the hazard itself, and, secondly, to psychological, social, and cultural components and their mutual interactions. In the case of natural hazards, risk perception analysis has to take into account that they vary immensely from sudden events such as flash floods, avalanches, or earthquakes to long lasting phenomena such as heat waves or droughts. Most comparative studies focus on human-induced dangers, whereas risk perception of natural hazards has been researched less often. It is somehow consistent with the fact, that people are usually much less...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Bell, P. A., Greene, T., Fisher, J., and Baum, A. S., 2005. Environmental Psychology. Orlando: Harcourt College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biernacki, W., Bokwa, A., Domański, B., Działek, J., Janas, K., and Padło, T., 2008. Mass media as a source of information about extreme natural phenomena in Southern Poland. In Carvalho, A. (ed.), Communicating Climate Change: Discourses, Mediations and Perceptions. Braga: Centro de Estudos de Comunicação e Sociedade, Universidade do Minho, pp. 190–200. Available from: http://www.lasics.uminho.pt/ojs/index.php/climate_change.

  • Breakwell, G. M., 2007. The Psychology of Risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, I., Kates, R. W., and White, G. F., 1993. The Environment as Hazard. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covello, V. T., 1991. Risk comparison and risk communication: issues and problems in comparing health and environmental risk. In Kasperson, R. E., and Stallen, P. J. M. (eds.), Communicating Risks to the Public. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 79–118.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Finucane, M. L., Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K., Flynn, J., and Satterfield, T. A., 2000. Gender, race, and perceived risk: the “white male” effect. Health, Risk and Society, 2(2), 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G. W., Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., Nair, I., and Lave, L. B., 1991. What risks are people concerned about? Risk Analysis, 11(2), 303–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, P. E., 1998. Gender differences in risk perception: theoretical and methodological perspectives. Risk Analysis, 18(6), 805–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, S., Shaw, D., and Ho, M.-C., 2008. Why are flood and landslide victims less willing to take mitigation measures than the public? Natural Hazards, 44(2), 305–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdoo, B. G., Moore, A., and Baumwoll, J., 2009. Indigenous knowledge and the near field population response during the 2007 Solomon Islands tsunami. Natural Hazards, 48(1), 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClure, J., Walkey, F., and Allen, M., 1999. When earthquake damage is seen as preventable: attributions, locus of control and attitudes to risk. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48, 239–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raaijmakers, R., Krywkow, J., and van der Veen, A., 2008. Flood risk perceptions and spatial multi-criteria analysis: an exploratory research for hazard mitigation. Natural Hazards, 46, 307–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O., 2008. Risk Governance. Coping with uncertainty in a complex world. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, R., Uy, N., and Baumwoll, J. (eds.), 2008. Indigenous Knowledge for Disaster Reduction: Good Practices and Lessons Learned from Experiences in the Asia-Pacific Region. Bangkok: United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. Available from www.unisdr.org/eng/about_isdr/isdr-publications/19-Indigenous_Knowledge-DRR/Indigenous_Knowledge-DRR.pdf.

  • Slovic, P., 2000. The Perception of Risk. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K., 2001. Environmental Hazards: Assessing Risk and Reducing Disaster. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, G. A., and Burrel, E. M., 1997. Natural Hazards: Explanation and Integration. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachinger, G., Renn, O., 2010. Risk perception and natural hazards. CapHaz-Net WP3 report. Stuttgart: DIALOGIK. Available from: http://caphaz-net.org/outcomes-results

  • White, G. F. (ed.), 1974. Natural Hazards: Local, National, Global. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaroslaw Dzialek PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Dzialek, J. (2013). Perception of Natural Hazards and Disasters. In: Bobrowsky, P.T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Natural Hazards. Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4399-4_265

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics