Skip to main content

In recent years, the language PSL (Property Specification Language, a.k.a. IEEE P1850) has been embraced and put to successful use by chip design/verification engineers across the electronics industry. While PSL is mainly used for hardware verification, it can, in fact, be used to verify a wide variety of systems, including missile interception systems, railway interlocking protocols, system automation policies, and even business processes.We discuss and exemplify how PSL can be used as a general purpose language for the specification of models and properties, beyond hardware systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dakshi Agrawal et al. Policy Management of Networked Systems and Applications. In Proc. of 9th Intl. Symp. on Integrated Network Management, IFIP/IEEE 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Barner, Z. Glazberg, and I. Rabinovitz. Wolf—Bug Hunter for Concurrent Software Using Formal Methods. In Proc. of 17th International Conference on Computer Aided Verification, LNCS 3576, Springer, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Barner and I. Rabinovitz. Efficient symbolic model checking of software using partial dis-junctive partitioning. CHARME, LNCS 2860, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  4. I. Beer et al. RuleBase: An Industry-Oriented Formal Verification Tool. In Proc. of the 33rd Design Automation Conference, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Booch, J. E. Rumbaugh, and I. Jacobson. Unified Modeling Language User Guide. Addison- Wesley, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Brand and P. Zafiropulo. On communicating finite-state machines. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 30(2), 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cindy Eisner, Dana Fisman. A Practical Introduction to PSL. Springer, August 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Janees Elamkulam et al. Detecting Design Flaws in UML State Charts for Embedded Software, to In Proc. of Haifa Verification Conference HVC 2006. LNCS 4383, Springer, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E.M. Clarke and E.A. Emerson, Design and Synthesis of Synchronization Skeletons Using Branching Time Temporal Logic. In Proc. of Workshop on Logics of Programs, LNCS 131, Springer, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Ghose. True Proportional Navigation with Maneuvering Target, IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C.-F. Lin. Modern Navigation, Guidance and Control Processing. Prentice Hall, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Moulin, L. Gluhovsky, and E. Bendersky. Formal Verification of Maneuvering Target Track- ing. Proc. of the AIAA Conf. of Guidance, Navigation and Control, Austin, TX, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Pnueli. A Temporal Logic of Concurrent Programs. In Theoretical Computer Science, Vol 13,1981.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. L. Steinberg. Comparison of Intelligent, Adaptive, and Nonlinear Flight Control Laws, Jour- nal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. van der Schaft, H. Schumacher. An Introduction to Hybrid Dynamical Systems. Springer, 2000. V.251 of Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Wasowski. Flattening Statecharts without Explosions. In Proc. of the 2004 ACM SIG-PLAN/SIGBED Conference on Languages, Compilers, and Tools for Embedded Systems, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Wright, R. Chadha, and G. Lapiotis (eds): Special Issue on Policy Based Networking, IEEE Networking 16, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Emmanuel Zarpas. A Case Study: Formal Verification of Processor Critical Properties, Correct Hardware Design and Verification Methods: CHARME 2005, LNCS 3725, Springer 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  19. IBM Tivoli System Automation for Multi-platforms, Guide and Reference, version 1.2, IBM, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  20. IBM Tivoli System Automation for Multi-platforms, Base Component Reference, version 2.1.1, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  21. IEEE Standard for Property Specification Language IEEE Std. 1850-2005, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  22. RuleBase PE homepage. http://www.haifa.il.ibm.com/projects/verification/RB Homepage/index.html, 2006

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Glazberg, Z., Moulin, M., Orni, A., Ruah, S., Zarpas, E. (2007). PSL: Beyond Hardware Verification. In: Ramesh, S., Sampath, P. (eds) Next Generation Design and Verification Methodologies for Distributed Embedded Control Systems. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6254-4_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6254-4_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6253-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6254-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics