Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., McNurlen, V., Archodidoi, A., Kim, S.-y, Reznitskaya, A., et al. (2001). The snowball phenomenon: Spread of ways of talking and ways of thinking across groups of children. Cognition and Instruction, 19, 1–46.
Billett, S. (1996). Situated learning: Bridging sociocultural and cognitive theorizing. Learning and Instruction, 6(3), 263–280.
Brown, A., & Campione, J. (1993). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction. Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 393–451). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Buckley, B. C. (2000). Interactive multimedia and model-based learning in biology. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 895–935.
Bulgren, J. A., Deshler, D. D., Schumaker, J. B., & Lenz, B. K. (2000). The use and effectiveness of analogical instruction in diverse secondary content classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 426–441.
Chi, M. T. H., Slotta, J. D., & Leeuw, N. d. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change from learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4, 27–43.
Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1998). An empirical test of a taxanomy of responses to anomalous data in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 623654.
Chiu, M.-H., Chou, C.-C., & Liu, C.-J. (2002). Dynamic processes of conceptual change: Analysis of constructing mental models of chemical equilibrium. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(8), 688–712.
Clement, J. (1988). Observed methods for generating analogies in scientific problem solving. Cognitive Science, 12, 563–586.
Clement, J. (1989). Learning via model construction and criticism. In G. Glover, R. Ronning, & C. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity: Assessment, theory and research (pp. 341–381). New York: Plenum.
Clement, J. (1993a). Model construction and criticism cycles in expert reasoning. Paper presented at the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Hillsdale, NJ.
Clement, J. (1993b). Scientific learning in experts: Explanatory model construction vs. induction from observations. Paper presented at the AERA Conference.
Clement, J. (1993c). Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students’ preconceptions in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1241–1257.
Clement, J. (2000a). Analysis of clinical interviews: Foundations and model viability. In A. E. Kelly, & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in mathematics and science education (pp. 547–589). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Clement, J. (2000b). Model based learning as a key research area for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 1041–1053.
Clement, J. (2003). Imagistic simulation in scientific model construction. In R. Alterman and D. Kirsh, Editors, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 25, 258–263. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Clement, J. (2004). Imagistic processes in analogical reasoning: Conserving transformations and dual simulations. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner & T. Regier, (Eds.),Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 26,233–238. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Clement, J. (in press). The role of explanatory models in teaching for conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou, (Eds.), Handbook of research on conceptual change.
Clement, J., Brown, D. E., & Zietsman, A. (1989). Not all preconceptions are misconceptions: Finding ‘anchoring conceptions’ for grounding instruction on students’ intuitions. International Journal of Science Education, 11(Special Issue), 554–565.
Clement, J., & Rea-Ramirez, M. A. (1998). The role of dissonance in conceptual change. Proceedings of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Conference.
Clement, J., & Steinberg, M. (2002). Step-wise evolution of mental models of electric circuits: A “learning-aloud” case study. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(4), 389–452.
Cobern, W. W. (1993). Contextual constructivism: The impact of culture on the learning and teaching of science. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science, pp. 51–69.
Collins, A., & Gentner, D. (1987). How people construct mental models. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in thought and language (pp. 243–265). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Craig, D. L., Nersessian, N., & Catambone, R. (2002). Perceptual Simulation in Analogical Problem Solving. In L. Magnani, & N. Nersessian (Eds.), Model-Based Reasoning: Science, Technology, Values (pp. 167–189). New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Dreyfus, A., Jungwirth, E. and Eliovitch, R. (1990) Applying the ‘Cognitive Conflict’ strategy for conceptual change - some implications, difficulties and problems. Science Education, 74 (5), 555–569
Darden, L. (1991). Theory change in science. Strategies from Mendelian genetics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Driver, R. (1995). Constructivist approaches to science teaching. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 385–400). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.
Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). Learning in science - from behaviorism towards social constructivism and beyond. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 3–25). Great Britain: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientist really reason: scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 256–396). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gentner, D., & Stevens, A. L. (Eds.) (1983). Mental models.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gilbert, J. K., & Boulter, C. (1998). Learning science through models and modeling. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 53–66). UK: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Gilbert, J. K. & Boulter, C. J. (2000). Developing models in science education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Glynn, S. M. (1991). Explaining science concepts: A teaching-with-analogies model. In Glynn, S. M., Yeany, R. H., & Britton, B. K. (Eds.) The Psychology of Learning Science(pp. 219–240). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gobert, J. (2000). A typology of causal models for plate tectonics: Inferential power and barriers to understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 937–977.
Gobert, J. D., & Buckley, B. C. (2000). Introduction to model-based teaching and learning in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 891–894.
Gould, S. J. (1980). Darwin’s middle road. In The panda’s thumb. More reflections in natural history. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Gruber, H. (1974). Darwin on man. New York: E. P. Dutton.
Harmon-Jones, E. & Mills, J. (1999). Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. Appendix B.
Harré, R. (1972). The philosophies of science: An introductory survey. NY: Oxford University Press.
Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (1996). Secondary students’ mental models of atoms and molecules: implications for teaching science. Science Education, 80, 509–534.
Hatano, G. (1993). Commentary: Time to merge Vygotskian and constructivist conceptions of knowledge acquisition. In E. A. Forman, N. Minick & C. A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children’s development. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hennessey, G. M. (1999). Probing the dimensions of metacognition: Implications for conceptual change teaching-learning. Paper presented at the NARST Conference, Boston, MA.
Hesse, M. (1966). Models and Analogy in Science. South Bend, IN: Notre Dame University Press.
Hewson, P., & M. Hewson. (1992). The status of students’ conceptions. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg, & H. Niedderer. (Eds.), Research in Physics Learning: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Studies, Kiel, Germany: Institute for Science Education.
Hogan, K. (1999b). Relating students’ personal frameworks for science learning to their cognition in collaborative contexts. Science Education, 83, 1–32.
Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K., & Pressley, M. (2000). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 17(4), 379–432.
Johnson, S. K., & Stewart, J. (1990). Using philosophy of science in curriculum development: An example from high school genetics. International Journal of Science Education, 12(3), 297–307.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1986). Reasoning without logic. In T. Myers, K. Brown & B. McGonigle (Eds.), Reasoning and discourse processes (pp. 13–49). London, UK: Academic Press.
Kuhn T. S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Kuhn, D., Black, J., Keselman, A., & Kaplan, D. (2000). The development of cognitive skills to support inquiry learning. Cognition and Instruction, 18(4), 495–523.
Leander, K. M., & Brown, D. E. (1999). “You understand but you don’t believe it”: Tracing the stabilities and instabilities of interaction in a physics classroom through a multidimensional framework. Cognition and Instruction, 17(1), 93–135.
Niedderer, H., Goldberg, F. (1996). Learning Processes in Electric Circuits. Paper presented at NARST, St. Louis MO, USA. (http://didaktik.physik.uni-bremen.de/ niedderer/pubs.htm)
Nersessian, N. J. (1985). Faraday’s field concept. In D. Gooding & F. A. J. L. James (Eds.), Faraday rediscovered. Essays on the life and work of Michael Faraday 1791–1867 (pp. 175–187). New York, NY: Stockton Press.
Nersessian, N. J. (1987). A cognitive-historical approach to meaning in scientific theories. In N. J. Nersessian (Ed.), The process of science (pp. 161–177). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Nersessian, N. J. (1990). Methods of conceptual change in science: Imagistic and analogical Reasoning. Philosophica, 45, 33–52.
Nersessian, N. J. (1992). How do scientists think? Capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science. In R. N. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science (Vol. 15, pp. 3–44). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Nersessian, N. J. (1995). Should physicists preach what they practice? Constructive modeling in doing and learning physics. Science & Education, 4, 203–226.
Nersessian, N. J., Kurz-Milcke, E., & Davies, J. (2005). Ubiquitous computing in science and engineering research laboratories: A case study from biomedical engineering. In G. Kouzoulis et al., (Eds.), (pp. 167–198). Knowledge in the New Technologies Berlin: Peter Lang Publishers.
Nunez-Oviedo, M. C. (2001). A teaching method derived from model construction and criticism theory. Unpublished Comprehensive Exam Paper, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Nunez-Oviedo, M. C. (2003). Teacher-student co-construction processes in biology: Strategies for developing mental models in large group discussions. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
Nunez-Oviedo, M. C., & Clement, J. (2002). An instructional method derived from model construction and criticism theory. Paper presented at the NARST Conference, New Orleans, LA.
Nunez-Oviedo, M. C., Rea-Ramirez, M. A., Clement, J., & Else, M. J. (2002). Teacher-student co-construction in middle school life science. Proceedings of the AETS Conference.
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.
Raghavan, K. & Glaser, R. (1995). Model based analysis and reasoning in science: the MARS curriculum. Science Education, 79, 37–61.
Rea-Ramirez, M. A. (1998). Model of conceptual understanding in human respiration and strategies for instruction. (Doctoral Dissertation) DAI - 9909208, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Rea-Ramirez, M. A. (March, 1999). Developing complex mental models through explanatory need. Paper presented at the NARST Conference, Boston, MA.
Rea-Ramirez & Gibson, (2001). Keeping the inquiry in curriculum designed to help students’ conceptual understanding of cellular respiration. Proceedings of the 2002 Annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science. Charlotte, N. C.
Rea-Ramirez, M. A., Nunez-Oviedo, M. C., Clement, J., Else, M. J. (2002). Energy in the human body: a middle school curriculum. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts.
Resnick, L. B., Salmon, M., Seitz, C. M., Wathen, S. H., & Holowchak, M. (1993). Reasoning in conversation. Cognition and Instruction, 11(3 & 4), 347–364.
Schnotz, W., & Preub, A. (1999). Task-dependent construction of mental models as a basis for conceptual change. In G. Rickheit, & C. Habel (Eds), Mental models in discourse processing and reasoning. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Schwartz, D. L., & Black, T. (1999). Inferences through imagined actions: knowing by simulated doing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 116–136.
Schweber, S. (1977). The origin of the origin revisited. Journal of the History of Biology, 10(229–316).
Scott, P. H. (1992). Pathways in learning science: A case study of the development of one student’s ideas relating to the structure of matter. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg & H. Niederer (Eds.), Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies. Proceedings of an International Workshop held at the University of Bremen (pp. 203–224). Kiel, Germany: IPN/Institute for Science Education.
Scott, P. H., Asoko, H. M., & Driver, R. H. (1992). Teaching for conceptual change: A review of strategies. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg & H. Niederer (Eds.), Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies. Proceedings of an International Workshop held at the University of Bremen (pp. 310–329). Kiel, Germany: IPN/Institute for Science Education.
Stavy, R. (1991) Using analogy to overcome misconceptions about conservation of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28 (4),305–313
Steinberg, M., & Wainwright, C. L. (1993). Using models to teach electricity -the CASTLE project. The Physics Teacher, 31(6), 353–357.
Trickett, S. & Trafton, J. G. (2002) The instantiation and use of conceptual simulations in evaluating hypotheses: Movies-in-the-mind in scientific reasoning. In WayneGray and Christian Schunn, (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society 22, 878–883. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual Revolutions, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
Thagard, P. (1997) Coherent and Creative Conceptual Combinations. In: T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, and J. Viad (eds), Creative thought: an investigation of conceptual structures and processes. Washington, DC. American Psychological Association.
Tweney, R. D. (1985). Faraday’s discovery of induction: A cognitive approach. In D. Goodling & F. James (Eds.), Faraday rediscovered: Essays on the life and work of Michael Faraday, 1791–1867 (pp. 189–209). New York: Stockton Press.
Tweney, R. D. (2001). Scientific thinking: A cognitive-historical approach. In K. Crowley, C. D. Schunn & T. Okada (Eds.), Designing for science. Implications from everyday, classroom, and professional settings (pp. 141–173). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Voss, J. F., Perkins, D. N., & Segal, J. W. (Eds.). (1991). Informal reasoning and education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978).Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3–118.
Zietsman, A. and Clement , J. (1987). The role of extreme case reasoning in instruction for conceptual change. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(1), 61–89.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rea-Ramirez, M.A., Clement, J., Núñez-Oviedo, M.C. (2008). An Instructional Model Derived from Model Construction and Criticism Theory. In: Clement, J.J., Rea-Ramirez, M.A. (eds) Model Based Learning and Instruction in Science. Models and Modeling in Science Education, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6494-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6494-4_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6493-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6494-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)