Skip to main content

Assessment of LES Quality Measures Using the Error Landscape Approach

  • Chapter
Quality and Reliability of Large-Eddy Simulations

Part of the book series: Ercoftac Series ((ERCO,volume 12))

Abstract

A large-eddy simulation database of homogeneous isotropic decaying turbulence is used to assess four different LES quality measures that have been proposed in the literature. The Smagorinsky subgrid model was adopted and the eddy-viscosity ‘parameter’ $CS$ and the grid spacing $h$ were varied systematically. It is shown that two methods qualitatively predict the basic features of an error landscape including an optimal refinement trajectory. These methods are based on variants of Richardson extrapolation and assume that the numerical error and the modelling error scale with a power of the mesh size. Hence they require the combination of simulations on several grids. The results illustrate that an approximate optimal refinement strategy can be constructed based on LES output only, without the need for DNS data. Comparison with the full error landscape shows the suitability of the different methods in the error assessment for homogeneous turbulence. The ratio of the estimated turbulent kinetic energy error and the ‘true’ turbulent kinetic energy error calculated from DNS is studied for different Smagorinsky parameters and different grid sizes. The behaviour of this quantity for decreasing mesh size gives further insight into the reliability of these methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Celik IB, Cehreli ZN, Yavuz I (2005) Index of resolution quality for large eddy simulations. ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering 127:949–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Celik I, Klein M, Freitag M, Janicka J (2006) Assessment measures for URANS/DES/LES: an overview with applications. Journal of Turbulence 7, Art no N48

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Chow FK, Moin P (2003) A further study of numerical errors in large-eddy simulations. Journal of Computational Physics 184:366–380

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Freitag M, Klein M (2006) An improved method to assess the quality of large eddy simulations in the context of implicit filtering. Journal of Turbulence 7, Art no N40

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Geurts BJ, Frouml;hlich J (2002) A framework for predicting accuracy limitations in large eddy simulations. Physics of Fluids 14(6):L41–L44

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Geurts BJ, Meyers J (2006) Successive inverse polynomial interpolation to optimize Smagorinsky’s model for large-eddy simulation of homogeneous turbulence. Physics of Fluids 18, Art no 118102

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Klein M (2005) An attempt to assess the quality of large eddy simulations in the context of implicit filtering. Flow Turbulence and Combustion 75:131–147

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Kravchenko AG, Moin P (1997) On the effect of numerical errors in large eddy simulation of turbulent flows. Journal of Computational Physics 131:310–322

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lilly DK (1967) The representation of small scale turbulence in mumerical simulation experiments. In: Proceedings of the IBM Scientific Computing Symposium on Environmental Sciences:195–210

    Google Scholar 

  10. Meyers J, Geurts BJ, Baelmans M (2003) Database analysis of errors in large-eddy simulation. Physics of Fluids 15(9):2740–2755

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Meyers J, Geurts BJ, Baelmans M (2005) Optimality of the dynamic procedure for large-eddy simulations. Physics of Fluids 17, Art no 045108

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Meyers J, Geurts BJ, Sagaut P (2007) A computational error assessment of central finite volume discretizations in large-eddy simulation using a Smagorinsky model. Journal of Computational Physics 227:156–173

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Meyers J, Sagaut P, Geurts BJ (2006) Optimal model parameters for multi-objective large-eddy simulations. Physics of Fluids 18, Art no 095103

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Pope SB (2000) Turbulent Flows. Cambridge Universtiy Press

    Google Scholar 

  15. Roache PJ (1998) Verification and Validation in Computational Science and Engineering. Hermosa Publishers, Albuquerque

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sagaut P (1998) Large Eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vreman B, Geurts B, Kuerten H (1996) Comparison of numerical schemes in large-eddy simulation of the temporal mixing layer. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 22:297–311

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Klein, M., Meyers, J., Geurts, B.J. (2008). Assessment of LES Quality Measures Using the Error Landscape Approach. In: Meyers, J., Geurts, B.J., Sagaut, P. (eds) Quality and Reliability of Large-Eddy Simulations. Ercoftac Series, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8578-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics