Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Argumentation, Evidence Evaluation and Critical Thinking

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Second International Handbook of Science Education

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE,volume 24))

Abstract

This chapter addresses the relationships between argumentation and critical thinking. The underlying questions are how argumentation supports the capacity to discriminate between claims justified by evidence and mere opinion, and how argumentation can contribute to two types of objectives related to learning science and to citizenship. First, various meanings for critical thinking in different communities are reviewed. Then, we propose our characterisation of critical thinking, which assumes that evidence evaluation is an essential component, but that there are other components related to the capacities of reflecting on the world around us and of participating in it (e.g. developing an independent opinion, including challenging the ideas of one’s own community). This characterisation draws both from the notion of commitment to evidence and from critical theorists. Using this frame, the chapter examines the contributions of argumentation in science education to the components of critical thinking, and also discusses the evaluation of evidence and the different factors influencing or even hampering it. The chapter concludes with consideration of the development of critical thinking in the science classroom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aikenhead, G. S. (1985). Collective decision making in the social context of science. Science Education, 69, 453–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T., Howe, C., Soden, R., Halliday, J., & Low, J. (2001). Peer interaction and the learning of critical thinking skills in further education students. Instructional Science, 29, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1970). La reproduction: Eléments pour une théorie du système d’enseignement. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit (Translated as: Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, K., & White, R. (2007). The practical critical educator. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, A., & Moore, J. (1992). Darwin. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R. A., & Grandy, R. E. (2008). Reconsidering the character and role of inquiry in school science: Framing the debates. In R. A. Duschl & R. E. Grandy (Eds.), Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation (pp. 1–37). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichinger, D. C., Anderson, C. W., Palincsar, A. S., & David, Y. M. (1991, April). An illustration of the roles of content knowledge, scientific argument, and social norms in collaborative problem solving. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eirexas, F., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2007, August). What does sustainability mean? Critical thinking and environmental concepts in arguments about energy by 12th grade students. Paper presented at the European Science Education Research Association Conference, Malmo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, R. H. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking abilities and dispositions. In J. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice (pp. 9–26). New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, R. H. (1992). Critical thinking: What is it? In H. A. Alexander (Ed.), Philosophy of Education 1992: Proceedings of the Forty-Eighth Annual Meeting of the Philosophy of Education Society (pp. 76–80). Urbana, IL: Philosophy of Education Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (Eds.). (2008). Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. The critical study of language. Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freinet, C. (1969). Pour l’école du peuple. Paris: Maspero.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogia do oprimido. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra. (Translated as Pedagogy of the oppressed, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. (1981). Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1981–1984). The theory of communicative action. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2008). Designing argumentation learning environments. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 91–115). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., Agraso, M. F., & Eirexas, F. (2004, April). Scientific authority and empirical data in argument warrants about the Prestige oil spill. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., Bugallo Rodríguez, A., & Duschl, R. A. (2000). “Doing the lesson” or “doing science”: Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84, 757–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Erduran, S. (2008). Argumentation in science education: An overview. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 3–27). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Federico-Agraso, M. (2009). Justification and persuasion about cloning: Arguments in Hwang’s paper and journalistic reported versions. Research in Science Education, 39, 331–347. doi 10.1007/s11165-008-9113-x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. J., Druker S., & Chen, C. (1998). Students’ reasoning about electricity: Combining performance assessment with argumentation analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 849–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolstø, S. D., & Ratcliffe, M. (2008). Social aspects of argumentation. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 117–136). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolstø, S. D., Bungum, B., Arnesen, E., Isnes, A., Kristensen, T., Mathiassen, K., Mestad, et al. (2006). Science students’ critical examination of scientific information related to socio-scientific issues. Science Education, 90, 632–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D. (2005). Education for thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Facal, R., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2009). Identities, social representations and critical thinking. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4, 689–695. doi 10.1007/s11422-008-9134-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, J. (2007). Children’s roles and use of evidence in science: An analysis of decision-making in small groups. British Educational Research Journal, 33, 371–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Márquez, C., Prats, A., & Marbá, A. (2007, August). A critical reading of press advertisement in the science class. Paper presented at the European Science Education Research Association Conference, Malmo.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, C. (1992). Why be critical? (Or rational or moral?) On the justification of critical thinking. In H. A. Alexander (Ed.), Philosophy of Education 1992: Proceedings of the Forty-Eighth Annual Meeting of the Philosophy of Education Society (pp. 60–68). Urbana, IL: Philosophy of Education Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscovici (1961–1976). La psychanalyse, son image et son public (2nd ed. revised). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, S. P. (1992). Bachelors, buckyballs and ganders: Seeking analogues for definitions of “critical thinker”. In H. A. Alexander (Ed.), Philosophy of Education 1992: Proceedings of the Forty-Eighth Annual Meeting of the Philosophy of Education Society (pp. 69–71). Urbana, IL: Philosophy of Education Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, S. P. (1995). Learning to live with scientific expertise: Toward a theory of intellectual communalism for guiding science teaching. Science Education, 79, 201–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, S. P., & Korpan, C. A. (2000). Science, views about science, and pluralistic science education. In R. Millar, J. Leach, & J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education: The contribution of research (pp. 227–244). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Ideas, evidence and argument in science. London: King’s College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, W. G. (1981). Cognitive and ethical growth: The making of meaning. In A. W. Chickering & Associates (Eds.), The modern American college (pp. 76–116). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puig, B., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2009). What do 9th grade students consider as evidence for or against claims about genetic differences in intelligence between black and white “races”? In M. Hammann, A. J. Waarlo & K. Boersma (Eds.), The nature of research in biological education: Old and new perspectives on theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 137–151). Utrecht: Utrecht University CD-ß Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socio scientific decision-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 112–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, H. (1988). Educating reason: Rationality, critical thinking and education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, H. (1989). The rationality of science, critical thinking and science education. Synthese, 80, 9–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonneaux, L., & Simonneaux, J. (2009). Students’ socio-scientific reasoning on controversies from the viewpoint of education for sustainable development. Cultural Studies of Science Education. doi 10.1007/s11422-008-9141-x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sóñora, F., García-Rodeja, I., & Brañas, M. (2001). Discourse analysis: Pupils’ discussions of soil science. In I. García-Rodeja, J. Díaz, U. Harms, & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd ERIDOB Conference (pp. 313–326). Santiago de Compostela: University of Santiago de Compostela.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanisstreet, M., Spofforth N., & Williams, T. (1993). Attitudes of children to the uses of animals. International Journal of Science Education, 15, 411–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. (2001). Return to reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R., Duggan, S., & Gott, R. (2000). Dimensions of evidence, the public understanding of science and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 2, 815–832.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2008). The role of moral reasoning on argumentation: Conscience, character and care. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 201–216). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, A., Weinberger, Y., & Tamir, P. (1994). The effect of the biology critical thinking project on the development of critical thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 183–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (MEC), partly funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), code SEJ2006-15589-C02-01/EDUC. The authors are grateful to Glen Aikenhead for his valuable feedback on the first draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Didactica das Ciencias Experimentais, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain

    María Pilar Jiménez-Aleixandre & Blanca Puig

Authors
  1. María Pilar Jiménez-Aleixandre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Blanca Puig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María Pilar Jiménez-Aleixandre .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Science & Mathematics Education Centre, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, West Australia, Australia

    Barry J. Fraser

  2. The Graduate Centre, City University of New York, New York, 10016-4309, New York, USA

    Kenneth Tobin

  3. Ctr. Mathematics & Science Education, Queensland University of Technology, Victoria Park Rd., Kelvin Grove, 4059, Queensland, Australia

    Campbell J. McRobbie

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jiménez-Aleixandre, M.P., Puig, B. (2012). Argumentation, Evidence Evaluation and Critical Thinking. In: Fraser, B., Tobin, K., McRobbie, C. (eds) Second International Handbook of Science Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_66

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation