Skip to main content

Moral Discourse in Economic Contexts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of the Sociology of Morality

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

The connection between morals and markets, once a central concern of the discipline of sociology, now finds itself the focus of renewed popular and academic interest. We consider these relationships between moral codes and various aspects of market society through the lens of language, specifically the different forms of moral discourse that perpetually surround economic activity. Our review focuses on discourse produced by both individuals and institutions in three different areas of the literature: identity construction relative to the labor market, decision-making and boundary-maintenance in market environments, and the shared discourses that legitimate key aspects of market structures and economic systems. A theme across these literatures concerns the ways in which individuals use moral discourse to both legitimate their own economic activities and decisions even as these same discourses are shaped in key ways by the institutions of market society, such as the workplace. Accordingly, we argue that language represents a key link between the institutions that structure economic order (the workplace, corporations, governments, and families) and the larger moral codes that sustain them. We conclude that analyzing moral discourse can help to identify deeper dimensions of existing economic inequalities as well as imaging some of their solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The methodological range of economic and cultural sociologists attests to the importance of multiple levels of inquiry, ranging from the discourse of collective enterprises to the cognitive workings of individual social actors. We believe it is important to distinguish between the “levels of morality” described through these various means, and to articulate the unique value of these different approaches. Intentionally worded surveys can measure unconscious moral constructs (Vaisey 2009) interviews can illustrate “accounts” prepared for public display and evaluation (Wuthnow 1996), and legal norms and other collectively-produced public statements illustrate the commonly shared moral beliefs of any given society (e.g. Abend 2008). All of these approaches offer important findings about moral reasoning, including the ideas and strategies embraced by individuals (as evidenced by interviews), the shared moral schema that underlie their activities and attitudes (as in multivariable analysis), as well as the larger social constructs that speak to shared, even taken for granted moral norms (e.g. legal codes).

  2. 2.

    The significance of “framing” analyses, for example could be significantly enhanced via careful attention to the ways in which different social groups are more likely to produce certain interpretations as well as find particular frames more resonant and compelling (Walder 2009).

References

  • Abend, G. 2008. “Two Main Problems in the Sociology of Morality.” Theory and Society 37: 87–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adamek, R. J. 1994. “A Review: Public Opinion and Roe V. Wade: Measurement Difficulties.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 58: 409–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeling, R. 2007. “Selling Genes, Selling Gender: Egg Agencies, Sperm Banks, and the Medical Market in Genetic Material.” American Sociological Review 72: 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ammerman, N. T. 1987. Bible Believers: Fundamentalists in the Modern World. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ammerman, N. T. 2003. “Religious Identities and Religious Institutions.” PP. 207–224 in Handbook of the Sociology of Religion, edited by M. Dillon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. 1999. Code of the Street: Decency, Violence, and the Moral Life of the Inner City. New York: W.W Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., and T. Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality : A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, J. 2005. The Limits of Transparency: Ambiguity and the History of International Finance. Ithaca: Cornel University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielby, D. D., and W. T. Bielby. 2003. “Telling Stories about Gender and Effort: Social Science Narratives About Who Works Hard for the Money.” PP. 193–217 The New Economic Sociology: Developments in an Emerging Field, edited by M. Guillen, R. Collins, P. England, and M. Meyer. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder, A. J. 2002. Contentious Curricula: Afrocentrism and Creationism in American Public Schools. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittman, M., P. England, L. Sayer, N. Folbre, and G. Matheson. 2003. “When Does Gender Trump Money? Bargaining and Time in Household Work.” American Journal of Sociology 109:186–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair-Loy, M. 2003. Competing Devotions: Career and Family Among Women Executives. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L., and L. Thevenot. 1999. “The Sociology of Critical Capacity.” European Journal of Social Theory 2:359–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L., and L. Thevenot. 2006. On Justification: Economies of Worth. C. Porter, Translator. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, L. A. 1974. Greedy Institutions; Patterns of Undivided Commitment. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. 1997. “Culture and Cognition.” Annual Review of Sociology 23:263–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dohan, D. 2003. The Price of Poverty: Money, Work, and Culture in the Mexican American Barrio. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. 1966. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge and K. Paul.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Edin, K., and L. Lein. 1997. Making Ends Meet: How Single Mothers Survive Welfare and Low-Wage Work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliasoph, N., and P. Lichterman. 2003. “Culture in Interaction.” American Journal of Sociology 108:735–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, M., and C. Smith. 2000. Divided by Faith. New York, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. H. 2002. Playing God?: Human Genetic Engineering and the Rationalization of Public Bioethical Debate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferree, M. M. 2003. “Resonance and Radicalism: Feminist Framing in the Abortion Debate in the United States and Germany.” American Journal of Sociology 109:304–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fourcade, M. 2007. “Theories of Markets and Theories of Society.” American Behavioral Scientist 50:1015–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fourcade, M., and K. Healy. 2007. “Moral Views of Market Society.” Annual Review of Sociology 33:285–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedland, R., and R. Alford. 1991. Bringing Society Back in: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions. PP. 223–262 in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by W. Powell, and P. DiMaggio. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamburd, M. 2004. “Breadwinner No More” PP. 190–206 inGlobal Woman: Nannies, Maids, and Sex Workers in the New Economy, edited by B. Ehrenreich, and A. R Hochschild. New York. Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gusfield, J. R. 1981. The Culture of Public Problems: Drinking-Driving and the Symbolic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. 1994. What Does the Lord Require? How American Christians Think About Economic Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, K. 2004. Sacred Markets and Secular Ritual in the Organ Transplant Industry. PP. 336–359 in Sociology of the Economy, edited by F. Dobbin. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, K. 2006. Last Best Gifts: Altruism and the Market for Human Blood and Organs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. R. 1997. The Time Bind : When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work. New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. R. 1990. The Second Shift. New York: Avon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackall, R. 1988. Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackall, R., and J. M. Hirota. 2000. Image Makers: Advertising, Public Relations, and the Ethos of Advocacy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasper, J. 1992. “The Politics of Abstractions: Instrumental and Moralist Rhetorics in Public Debate.” Social Research 59:315–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. 1977. Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. 2006. Thinking Points: Communicating OUR AMERICAN VALUES and Vision : A Progressive’s Handbook. New York: Farrar Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luker, K. 1984. Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, J. 1995. Ain’t No Makin’ It : Aspirations and Attainment in a Low-Income Neighborhood. Boulder, Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahler, S. J. 1995. American Dreaming: Immigrant Life on the Margins. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. L. 2002. “Power, Authority, and the Constraint of Belief Systems.” American Journal of Sociology 107: 861–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. 1998. A Theory of Shopping. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M. K. 1990. Negotiated Care : The Experience of Family Day Care Providers. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, K. 1988. Falling from Grace: The Experience of Downward Mobility in the American Middle Class. New York and London, Free Press and Collier Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, K. 1999. No Shame in My Game : The Working Poor in the Inner City. New York, Knopf and the Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo, G., and A. Scherer. 2006. “Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation: A Communicative Framework.” Journal of Business Ethics 66:71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, J. 2009. Those Who Work, Those Who Don’t: Poverty , Morality, and Family in Rural America. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. 2003. Moral, Believing Animals: Human Personhood and Culture. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Somers, M. R. 1994. “The Narrative Construction of Identity: A Relational and Network Approach.” Theory and Society 23:605–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steensland, B. 2008. The Failed Welfare Revolution: America’s Struggle Over Guaranteed Income Policy. Princeton, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaisey, S. 2009. “Motivation and Justification: A Dual-Process Model of Culture in Action.” American Journal of Sociology 114:1675–1715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner-Pacifici, R. E. 1994. Discourse and Destruction: The City of Philadelphia Versus MOVE. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walder, A. 2009. “Political Sociology and Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 35:393–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, M. C. 1999. Black Identities : West Indian Immigrant Dreams and American Realities. New York and Cambridge: Russell Sage Foundation and Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. 1958. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. J. 1996. When Work Disappears: The World of the New Urban Poor. New York, NY, Alfred A. Knopf: Distributed by Random House Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. 2002. Faith in Action: Religion, Race, and Democratic Organizing in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, R. 1987. Meaning and Moral Order: Explorations in Cultural Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, R. 1989. Communities of Discourse: Ideology and Social Structure in the Reformation, the Enlightenment, and European socialism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, R. 1994. Producing the Sacred: An Essay on Public Religion. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, R. 1996. Poor Richard’s principle: Recovering the American Dream Through the Moral Dimension of Work, Business, and Money. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. A. 2004. The Minds of Marginalized Black Men: Making Sense of Mobility, Opportunity, and Future Life Chances. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelizer, V. A. 1979. Morals and Markets: the Development of Life Insurance in the United States. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelizer, V. A. 1994. The Social Meaning of Money. New York: BasicBooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelizer, V. A. 2005. The Purchase of Intimacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Stephen Vaisey for his useful comments on an earlier version of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebekah P. Massengill .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Massengill, R.P., Reynolds, A. (2010). Moral Discourse in Economic Contexts. In: Hitlin, S., Vaisey, S. (eds) Handbook of the Sociology of Morality. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6896-8_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics