Skip to main content

Hierarchy Theory: A Guide to System Structure for Wildlife Biologists

  • Chapter
Wildlife and Landscape Ecology

Abstract

Hierarchy theory is part of the conceptual foundation of landscape ecology. Developments in landscape ecology over the past decade have cooccurred with developments of hierarchy theory as applied to ecological systems, and many individual authors have contributed to both. The seminal monographs of Forman and GodronLandscape Ecologyand O’Neill et al.A Hierarchical Concept of Ecosystemswere both published in 1986 (Forman and Godron 1986, O’Neill et al. 1986). Robert (Bob) O’Neill in particular has contributed a great deal to both fields (e.g. O’Neill 1988 1989, O’Neill et al. 1986, 1988 1989). By 1987 Urban et al. (1987) had proposed a hierarchal perspective for landscape ecology. In 1989Landscape Ecology (Volume 3, nos. 3/4) published the proceedings of a workshop on scale. In this volume O’Neill et al. (1989)) argued that hierarchy theory provides a framework for the analyses of scale in landscapes and other ecological systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, T.F.H. In press. The landscape “level” is dead: persuading the family to take it off the respirator. In D.L. Peterson and V.T. Parker, editors. Scale issues in ecology. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T.F.H., and T.B. Starr. 1982. Hierarchy: perspectives for ecological complexity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T.F.H., and T.W. Hoekstra. 1984. Nested and non-nested hierarchies: a significant distinction for ecological systems. Pp. 175–180 in A.W. Smith, editor. Proceedings of the Society for General Systems Research. I. Systems methodologies and isomorphies. Intersystems Publications, Coutts Library Services, Lewiston, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T.F.H., R.V. O’Neill, and T.W. Hoekstra. 1984. Interlevel relations in ecological research and management: some working principles from hierarchy theory. General Technical Report RM-110. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T.F.H., and T.W. Hoekstra. 1990. The confusion between scale-defined levels and conventional levels of organization in ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science 1:5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T.F.H., and T.W. Hoekstra. 1992. Toward a unified ecology. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Bertalanffy, L. 1968. General system theory. George Braziller, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caswell, H., H.E. Koenig, J.A. Resh, and Q.E. Ross. 1972. An introduction to systems science for ecologists. Pp. 3–78 in B.C. Patten, editor. Systems analysis and simulations in ecology. Vol. II. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crist, T.O., and J.A. Wiens. 1994. Scale effects of vegetation on forager movement and seed harvesting by ants. Oikos 69:37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelis, D.L., W.M. Post, and C.C. Travis. 1986. Positive feedback in natural systems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, Jr., J.B., D.J. Stewart, B.J. Danielson, B.R. Noon, T.L. Root, R.H. Lamberson, and E.E. Stevens. 1995. Spatially explicit population models: current forms and future uses. Ecological Applications 5:3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R.T.T., and M. Godron. 1986. Landscape ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R.H., R.V. O’Neill, M.G. Turner, and V.H. Dale. 1989. Quantifying scale-dependent effects of animal movement with simple percolation models. Landscape Ecology 3:217–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grobstein, C. 1973. Hierarchical order and neogenesis. Pp. 31–47 in H.H. Pattee, editor. Hierarchy theory: the challenge of complex systems. George Braziller, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, M., D. DeAngelis, and W. Post. 1988. New computer models unify ecological theory. BioScience 38:682–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerner, E.H. 1957. A statistical mechanics of interacting biological species. The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 19:121–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A.W. 1991. Translating models across scales in the landscape. Pp. 479–517 in M.G. Turner and R.H. Gardner, editors. Quantitative methods in landscape ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A.W.1993. Considerations of scale and hierarchy. Pp. 19–45 in S. Woodley, G. Francis, and J. Key, editors. Ecological integrity and the management of ecosystems. Lewis Publishers Inc., Chelsea, Michigan, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A.W., W.R. Emanuel, and R.V. O’Neill. 1990. Linking mechanistic models of tree physiology with models of forest dynamics: problems of temporal scale. Pp. 241–248 in R.K. Dixon, R.S. Meldahl, G.A. Ruark, and W.G. Warren, editors. Process modeling of forest growth responses to forest stress. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A.W., A.R. Johnson, and R.V. O’Neill. 1991. Transmutation and functional representation of heterogeneous landscapes. Landscape Ecology 5:239–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koestler, A. 1967. The ghost in the machine. Macmillan, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotliar, N.B., and J.A. Wiens. 1990. Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity. Oikos 59:253–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., J.B. Dunning Jr., and H.R. Pulliam. 1995. Potential effects of a forest management plan on Bachman’s sparrow(Aimophila aestivalis):linking a spatially explicit model with GIS. Conservation Biology 62–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, R.V. 1988. Hierarchy theory and global change. Pp. 29–45 in T. Rosswall, R.G. Woodmansee, P.G. Risser, editors. Scales and global change. John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, R.V. 1989. Perspectives in hierarchy and scale. Pp. 140–156 in J. Roughgarden, R.M. May, and S.A. Levin, editors. Perspectives in ecological theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, R.V., D.L. DeAngelis, J.B. Waide, and T.F.H. Allen. 1986. A hierarchical concept of ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, R.V., J.R. Krummel, R.H. Gardner, G. Sugihara, B. Jackson, D.L. DeAngelis, B.T. Milne, M.G. Turner, B. Zygmunt, S.W. Christensen, V.H. Dale, and R.L. Graham. 1988. Indices of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 1:153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, R.V., A.R. Johnson, and A.W. King. 1989. A hierarchical framework for the analysis of scale. Landscape Ecology 3:193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, R.V., and A.W. King. In press. Homage to St. Michael: or why are there so many books on scale? In D.L. Peterson and V.T. Parker, editors. Scale issues in ecology. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton, W.S. 1977. A strategy of model construction. Pp. 53–70 in C.A.S. Hall and J.W. Day, editors. Ecosystem modeling in theory and practice: an introduction with case histories. John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I. 1980. From being to becoming: time and complexity in the physical sciences. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam, H.R., J.B. Dunning Jr., and J. Liu. 1992. Population dynamics in complex landscapes: a case study. Ecological Applications 2:165–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R. 1989. Similitude, similarity, and scaling. Landscape Ecology 3:207–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salthe, S.N. 1985. Evolving hierarchical systems. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serway, R.A. 1986. Physics for scientists and engineers with modern physics. 2 edition. Saunders College Publishing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shugart, H.H. 1984. A theory of forest dynamics. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shugart, H.H., Jr., and D.C. West. 1977. Development of an Appalachian deciduous forest succession model and its application to assessment of the impact of the chestnut blight. Environmental Management 5:161–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. 1962. The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 106:467–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. 1973. The organization of complex systems. Pp. 3–27 in H.H. Pattee, editor. Hierarchy theory: the challenge of complex systems. George Braziller, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G., R.V. O’Neill, R.H. Gardner, and B.T. Milne. 1989a. Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 3:153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G., V.H. Dale, and R.H. Gardner. 1989b. Predicting across scales: theory development and testing. Landscape Ecology 3:245–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G., and R.H. Gardner. 1991. Quantitative methods in landscape ecology: an introduction. Pp. 3–14 in M.G. Turner and R.H. Gardner, editors. Quantitative methods in landscape ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G., G.J. Arthaud, R.T. Engstrom, S.J. Hejl, J. Liu, S. Loeb, and K. McKelvey. 1995. Usefulness of spatially explicit population models in land management. Ecological Applications 5:12–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G., Y. Wu, W.H. Romme, and L.L. Wallace. 1993. A landscape simulation model of winter foraging by large ungulates. Ecological Modelling 69:163–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban, D.L., R.V. O’Neill, and H.H. Shugart Jr. 1987. Landscape ecology. BioScience 37:119–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, G.M. 1975. An introduction to general systems thinking. John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J.A. 1985. Vertebrate responses to environmental patchiness in arid and semiarid ecosystems. Pp. 169–193 in S.T.A. Pickett and P.S. White, editors. The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J.A. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional Ecology 3:385–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J.A., and B.T. Milne. 1989. Scaling of “landscapes” in landscape ecology, or landscape ecology from a beetle’s perspective. Landscape Ecology 3:87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • With, K.A., and T.O. Crist. 1995. Critical thresholds in species’ responses to landscape structure. Ecology 76:2446–2459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

King, A.W. (1997). Hierarchy Theory: A Guide to System Structure for Wildlife Biologists. In: Bissonette, J.A. (eds) Wildlife and Landscape Ecology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1918-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1918-7_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7338-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1918-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics