Skip to main content

A Critical View of Driver Behavior Models: What Do We Know, What Should We Do?

  • Chapter
Book cover Human Behavior and Traffic Safety

Abstract

There appears to be a lack of new ideas in driver behavior modeling. Although behavioral research is under some pressure, it seems too facile to attribute this deplorable state of affairs only to a lack of research funds. In my opinion the causal chain may well run in the opposite direction. An analysis of what is wrong has led me to the conclusion that human factors research in the area of driver behavior has hardly been touched by the “cognitive revolution” that swept psychology in the past fifteen years. A more cognitive approach might seem advisable and the “promise of progress” of such an approach should be assessed.

The past twenty years have, of course, given us many insights that will remain applicable, provided they can be made to fit a cognitive frame of reference. The major categories of models of the past two decades are reviewed in order to pinpoint their strengths—and perhaps their weaknesses—in that framework. This review includes such models as McKnight & Adams’ task analysis, Kidd & Laughery’s early behavioral computer simulations, the linear control models (such as McRuer & Weir’s), as well as some more recent concepts such as Näätänen & Summala’s, Wilde’s and Fuller’s risk coping models which already carry some cognitive weight.

What can we take from these conceptualizations of driver behavior and what is it that they are lacking thus far? Having proposed my answers to these questions an attempt is made to formulate an alternative approach, based on production systems as developed by J.R. Anderson.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ACRIT (Advisory Committee on Research of Information Transfer). Informa-tieverzorging: Onderzoek onderzocht. Rapport van de Ministerigle Verken-ningscommissie Onderzoek Informatieverzorging. Den Haag: Staatsdrukkerij en Uitgeverij, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M., Attitude-behavior relations: a theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin 84, 888–918, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alberti, E., and Belli, G., Contributions to the Boltzmann-like approach fro traffic flow: A model for concentration dependent driving programs. Transportation Research, 12, 33–42, 1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.R., Cognitive psychology and its implications. San Francisco: Free-man, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.R. (ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erl- baum, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.R., Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369–406, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.R., The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliersbach, G., and Dellen, R.G., Interaction conflicts and interaction patterns in traffic situations. International Review of Applied Psychology, 29, 475_490, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, W.F., There is no convincing evidence for operant or classical conditioning in adult humans. In: W.B. Weimer, and D.S. Palermo (eds.), Cognition and the symbolic pocesses. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, J.J., Gaskill, H.S., Gladd, D.D., Hassell, L., Rainey, R.V. and Sawrey, D.W.L., Psychological and psychophysical factors in motor vehicle accidents. Journal of the American Medical Association 169, pp. 1581–1587, 1959.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crossman, E.R.F.W., and Szostak, H., Man-machine models for car steering. Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Conference on Manual Control. NASA Report SP 192, pp. 171–195. Washington DC, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.C., Brainstorms: Philosophical essays on mind and psychology. Montgomery, VT: Bradford Books, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.C., Three kinds of intentional psychology. In: R. Healy (ed.), Reduction, time and reality: studies in the philosophy of the natural sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, R.M., and Stea, D. (eds.), Image and environment: Cognitive mapping and spatial behavior. Chicago: Aldine, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edie, L.C., and Foote, R.S., Effect of shock waves on tunnel traffic flow. Highway Research Board, Proceedings Vol. 39, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K.A. and Simon, H.A., Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215–251, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fell, J.C., A motor vehicle accident causal system: The human element. Human Factors, 18, 85–94, 1976.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitts, P.M., Perceptual–motor skill learning. In: A.W. Melton (ed.), Categories of human learning. New York: Academic Press, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, J., The science of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman, E.A., Performance assessment based on an empirically derived task taxonomy. Human Factors, 9, 349–366, 1967.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman, E.A. Toward a taxonomy of human performance. American Psychologist, 30, 1127–1149, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, T.W. (ed.), Human factors in highway traffic safety research. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, R., A conceptualization of driver behavior as threat avoidance. Ergonomics, 27, 1139–1155, 1984.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J.J., The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, H., An analysis of traffic flow. Operations Research, 1959, 7,...

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, E.R., The psychology of learning. New York: Harper and Row, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastie, R., Social inference. Annual Review of Psychology 1983, 34, 511–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauber, A., Gedrag van mensen in beweging: onderzoek naar agressie in het verkeer en fraude bij het openbaar vervoer. Dissertation, University of Leiden, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, R., Montroll, E., Potts, R., and Rothery, R., Traffic dynamics: Analysis of stability in car following. Operations Research, 7,..., 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyos, C. Graf, Stellungnahme zu einer Diskussion über die Theorie der Risi-kokompensation. Zeitschrift fur Verkehrssicherheit, 30, 61–62, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huguenin, R.D., Zur Problematik von Risikohomöostasetheorien in der Ver-kehrspsychologie. Zeitschrift fur Verkehrssicherheit, 28, 180–187, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, W.H., Routeplanning en geleiding: Een literatuurstudie. Report IZF 1979 C-13. Soesterberg ( The Netherlands ): Institute for Perception TNO, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidd, E.A., and Laughery, K.R., A computer model of driving behavior: The highway intersection situation. Buffalo, NY: Cornell Aeronautical Laboratories, Report nr. VI-1843-V-1, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klebeisberg, D., Subjektive und objektive Sicherheit im Strassenverkehr als Aufgabe fur die Verkehrssicherheitsarbeit. Schriftenreihe der Deutschen Ver-kehrswacht 51, 3–12, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klebeisberg, D. Das Modell der subjektiven und objektiven Sicherheit. Schweiz-erische Zeitschrift fur Psychologie und ihre Anwendungen 36, 285–294, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapper, C.K., Leplat, J., and Michon, J.A. (eds.), Special issue on driving behaviour. International Review of Applied Psychology, 29, 397–528, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenderink, J.J., and Van Doorne, A.J., How an ambulant observer can construct a model of the environment from the geometrical structure of the visual inflow. Kybernetik 19, 224–247, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levelt, W.J.M., Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14,... 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, E.B., and Goldblatt, R., A review of the driver-vehicle effectiveness (DRIVEM) model. New York: KLD Associates Inc., Report 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, G., Mind and emotion. New York: Wiley, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margulis, L., and Schwartz, K.V., Five kingdoms: An illustrated guide to the phyla of life on earth. San Francisco: Freeman, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, F., The human factor in driving accidents: An overview of approaches and problems. Ergonomics 25, 867–877, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, F., Accident proneness: a conceptual analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention 15, 65–72, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, F., Do safety measures really work?: An examination of risk homeo-stasis theory. Ergonomics, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKnight, A.J., and Adams. B.B., Driver education task analysis. Volume I: Task descriptions. Alexandria, VA: Human Resources Research Organization, Final Report, Contract No FH 11 - 7336, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKnight, A.J., and Adams, B.B., Driver education task analysis. Volume II: Task analysis methods. Alexandria, VA: Human Resources Research Organization, Final Report, Contract No FH 11 - 7336, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKnight, A.J., and Hundt, A.G., Driver education task analysis. Volume III: Instructional Objectives. Alexandria, VA: Human Resources Research Organization, Final Report, Contract No FH 11–7336, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRuer, D.T., and Weir, D.H., Theory of manual vehicular control. Ergonomics, 12, 599–633, 1969.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McRuer, D.T., Allen, R.W., Weir, D.H., and Klein, R.H., New results in driver steering control models. Human Factors 19, 381–397, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michon, J.A. Psychonomie onderweg (Inaugural Lecture). Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michon J.A., The mutual impacts of transportation and human behavior. In: P. Stringer and H. Wenzel (eds.), Transportation planning for a better environment, pp. 221–236. New York: Plenum Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michon, J.A., Dealing with danger: Report of the European Commission MRC Workshop on physiological and psychological factors in performance under hazardous conditions, Gieten, The Netherlands, 23–25 May, 1978. Haren (The Netherlands): Traffic Research Center, University of Groningen, Report VK 79 - 01, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michon, J.A., Telling road users who they are and what they do: can they profit? International Review of Applied Psychology 29, 399–414, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michon, J.A., Over de metatheoretische grondslagen van de psychonomie. In: J.G.W. Raaijmakers, P.T.W. Hudson, and A.H. Wertheim (eds.), Metatheore-tische aspecten van de psychonomie. Deventer: Van Loghum Slaterus, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michon, J.A., Traffic and mobility. In: P.J.D. Drenth, H. Thierry, P.J. Willems, and Ch.J. de Wolff (eds.), Handbook of work and organizational psychology, Vol. 2, New York: Wiley, 1984, pp 1165–1196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michon, J.A. and Van der Molen, H.H., Sociale verkeerskunde: verslag van het symposium gehouden in Groningen, November 1974. Den Haag: ANWB, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T.M., and Schuster, D.H., Long-term predictability of driver behavior. Accident Analysis and Prevention 1983, 15, 11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naatànen, R., and Summala, H., A model for the role of motivational factors in drivers’ decision-making. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 1974, 6, 243–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naatânen, R., and Summala, H., Road user behavior and traffic accidents. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Cy, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A., and Simon, H.A., Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice-Hall, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R.E., and Wilson, T.D., Telling more than we can know. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D.A., Categorization of action slips. Psychological Review, 88, 1–15, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pailhous, J., La représentation de l’espace urbain. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perchonok, K., Accident cause analysis. Report prepared for the US Department of Transportation, DOT HS 800 716. Buffalo, NY: Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preyss, A.E.: A theory and model of human learning behavior in a manual control task. NASA Contractor Report, NASA CR-1124. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quenault, S.W., Driver behavior, safe and unsafe drivers. Transportation and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, U.K.: Report Nr. LR 70, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quenault, S.W., Golby, C.W., and Pryer, P.M., Age groups and accident rate— driving behavior and attitudes. Transportation and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, U.K.: Report Nr. LR 167, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, L.D., Survey of recent driving steering behavior models suited to accident investigations. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 15, 23–40, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riemersma, J.J., Visual control during straight road driving. Acta Psychologica, 48, 215–225, 1981.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R.C., Dynamic memory: A theory of reminding and learning in computers and people. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, L., and Sichel, H., Accident proneness. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinar, D., Psychology on the road: the human factor in traffic safety. New York: Wiley, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shor, R.E., Shared patterns of nonverbal expectations in automobile driving. Journal of Social Psychology, 62, 155–163, 1964.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D.H. Drivers’ galvanic skin response and the risk of accident. Ergonomics, 7, 439–451, 1964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Molen, H.H., Rothengatter, J.A. and Vinjé, M.P., Blueprint of an analysis of the pedestrian’s task—I. Method of analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 13, 175–192, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Molen, H.H., Pedestrian ethology: unobtrusive observations of child and adult road-crossing behaviour in the framework of the development of a child pedestrian training programme. Haren (The Netherlands): Traffic Research Center, University of Groningen, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veling, I., Measuring driving knowledge. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 14, 81–86, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weir, D.H., and McRuer, D.T., A theory for driver steering control of motor vehicles. In: Road user characteristics, Highway Research Record, nr. 247, 7–28, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheim, A.H., Wagenaar, W.A., and Leibowitz, H.W. (eds.), Tutorials on motion perception. New York: Plenum Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierwille, W.W., and Gagné, G.A., Non-linear and time varying dynamical models of human operators in manual control systems. Human Factors, 8, 97–120, 1966.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, G.J.S., Theorie der Risikokompensation der Unfallsverursachung und ihre praktische Folgerungen für die Unfallverhütung. Hefte zur Unfallheilkunde 130, 134–156, 1978.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, G.J.S., The theory of risk homeostasis: implications for safety and health. Risk Analysis, 2, 209–225, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, G.J.S., Evidence refuting the theory of risk homeostasis?: a rejoinder to Frank P. McKenna. Ergonomics, 27, 297–304, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, G.J.S., and Murdoch, P., Incentive systems for accident-free and violence-free driving in the general population. Ergonomics, 25, 879–890, 1982.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wohl, M., and Martin, B.V., Traffic systems analysis for engineers and planners. New York: McGraw–Hill, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, J.D., and Barrett, M.F., Driver-vehicle effectiveness model; volume I: Final report. Washington, DC: Department of Transportation. Report No DOT HS 804 337, 1978 (a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, J.D., and Barrett, M.F., Driver-vehicle effectiveness model; volume II: Appendices. Washington, DC: Department of Transportation. Report No DOT HS 804 338, 1978 (b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wonham, W.M., Towards an abstract internal model principle. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 6, 735–740, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, L.R., On adaptive manual control. Ergonomics, 12, 635–674, 1969.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Michon, J.A. (1985). A Critical View of Driver Behavior Models: What Do We Know, What Should We Do?. In: Evans, L., Schwing, R.C. (eds) Human Behavior and Traffic Safety. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2173-6_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2173-6_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9280-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-2173-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics