Abstract
…after people read the paper a lot of people understood the theory of relativity in some way or other, certainly more than twelve. On the other hand, I think I can safely say that no one understands quantum mechanics….do not keep saying to yourself, if you possibly can avoid is, ‘But how can it be like that?’ because you will get “down the drain”, into a blind alley from which nobody has yet escaped. nobody knows how it can be like that (Feynmann, 1967, p. 129).
Particularly over the last fifteen years there has been considerable research interest in the student’s perceptions of phenomena in such areas as energy, motion, the particulate nature of matter, electricity, and light. However, ninety years after the genesis of quantum physics significant research on students’ understanding of such revolutionary phenomena is only beginning to emerge. This new study is designed to build on and complement previous work carried out principally by research groups in Bremen, Berlin and València. The aim of the Students’ Conceptions of Quantum Physics Project is to elicit students’ conceptions of quantum phenomena, investigate their use of metaphors and analogies in constructing conceptual models, and evaluate the efficacy of the incorporation of quantum physics at the pre-university level. The study should lead to more effective teaching and learning strategies, and inform policy and curriculum decision-making.
…nobody really understands quantum theory
—Richard Feynmann
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, B., 1986, “The experimental Gesalt of causation: A common core to pupils’ preconceptions in science”, European Journal of Science Education , 8 (2), 155–171.
Ausubel, D., 1968, Educational Psychology , Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
Bethge, T., 1988, Aspekte des Schülervorverständnisses zu grundlegenden Begriffen der Atomphysik (Aspects of student’s matrices of understanding related to basic concepts of atomic physics), PhD thesis, University of Bremen, Germany.
Bormann, M., 1987, DasSchülervorverständnisses zum Themenbereich “Modellvorstellungen zu Licht und Elektronen ” (Students ’Alternative Framework in the Field of Particle and Wave Models of Light and Electrons), in W. Kuhn (ed.), Didaktik der Physik, Vorträge, Physikertagung 1987, Gießen, Berlin..
Burrell, G. and Morgan, G., 1979, Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis, Heinemann Educational Books, London.
Cushing, J. T., 1990, “Copenhagen hegemony: Need it be so?” in P. Lahti (ed.), Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics (1990), Joensuu (Finland), 13–17 August 1990, Peter Mittelstaedt Publisher, World Scientific.
Driver, R., 1981, “Pupils’ alternative frameworks in science”, European Journal of Science Education, 3(1), 93–101.
Driver, R. and Bell, B., 1986, “Students’ thinking and the learning of science: A constructivist view”, School Science Review, 443–455.
Erickson, G., 1979, “Children’s conceptions of heat and temperature”, Science Education, 63, 221–230.
Faucher, G., 1987 “Pragmatical Conceptions in the Atomic Domain”, in Proceedings of 2nd International Seminar on “Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics ”, J. Novak (ed.), Cornell University.
Feynmann, R., 1967, The Character of Physical Law, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Fine, A., 1986, The Shaky Game, University of Chicago Press.
Fischler, H. and Lichtfeldt, M., 1992, “Modern physics and students’ conceptions”, International Journal of Science Education, 14, 181–190.
Garcia-Castañeda, M., 1985, “An abuse with the wave properties of matter”, American Journal of Physics, 53, 373–374.
Gil, D. and Solbes, J., 1993, “The introduction of modern physics: overcoming a deformed vision of science”, International Journal of Science Education, 15, 255–260.
Gilbert, J. and Watts, D., 1983, “Concepts, misconceptions and alternative conceptions: changing perspectives in science education”, Studies in Science Education ,10, 61–98.
Harré, R., 1961, Theories and Things, Sheed and Ward, London.
Kidd, R., Ardini, J. and Anton, A., 1989, “Evolution of the modern photon”, American Journal of Physics, 57, 27–35.
Lehrman, R. L., 1982, “Confused physics: a tutorial critique”, The Physics Teacher, 20, 519–523.
Muncaster, R., 1993, A-Level Physics, Stanley Thornes, Cheltenham.
Niedderer, H., 1987, “Alternative framework of students in mechanics and atomic physics, Methods of research and results”, in Proceedings of 2nd International Seminar on “Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics ”, J. Novak (ed.), Cornell University.
Niedderer, H., Bethge, T. and Cassens, H., 1990, “A simplified quantum model: A teaching approach and evaluation of understanding”, in Relating Macroscopic Phenomena to Microscopic Particles -A Central Problem in Secondary Science Education, P. L Lijuse et al. (eds.), CD-ß Press, Utrecht, 67–80.
Osborne, M. and Freyburg, P., 1985, Learning in Science: Implications of Children s Knowledge, Heineman, Auckland.
Osborne, R. and Gilbert, J., 1980, “A technique for exploring students’ views of the world”, Physics Education, 15, 376–379.
Pope, M. and Gilbert, J., 1983, “Explanation and metaphor in some empirical questions in science education?”, European Journal of Science Education, 5, 249–261.
Popper, K., 1963, Conjectures and Refutations, Routledge and Kegan, London.
Shay er, M. and Adey, P., 1981, Towards a science of science teaching: Cognitive development and curriculum demand, Heinemann Educational Books, London.
Sutton, C., 1992, Words, Science and Learning, Open University Press, Buckingham.
White, R. and Gunstone, R., 1992, Probing Understanding, Falmer Press, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mashhadi, A. (1995). Students’ Conceptions of Quantum Physics. In: Bernardini, C., Tarsitani, C., Vicentini, M. (eds) Thinking Physics for Teaching. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1921-8_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1921-8_25
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5786-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1921-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive