Skip to main content

Using Environmental Simulation to Test the Validity of Code Requirements

  • Chapter
Enabling Environments

Part of the book series: Plenum Series in Rehabilitation and Health ((SSRH))

Abstract

Environmental simulation is a means of matching the design of specific environmental features to human performance capabilities. When researchers systematically model realistic environments that people can move through and manipulate, subjects can comprehend both the level of effort required to use specific environmental features as well as the impact of size and proportions. Moreover, simulations permit observers to assess problems encountered with use and to identify limitations of the design directly, rather than having to rely on subjective evaluations of the user (Steinfeld, 1988). As a consequence, full-scale simulation affords the ability to evaluate the usability and safety of one or more environmental features under controlled conditions that are not available in the real world. This is particularly useful in evaluating the performance and safety impacts of alternative environmental variables (Stokols, 1993).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Access Board. (1991). American with disabilities act accessibility guidelines. Washington, DC: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Institute of Architects Foundation. (1985). Design for aging: An architect’s guide. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American National Standards Institute. (1992). Providing accessibility and usability for physically handicapped people, ANSI A117.1-1992 (revisions of ANSI A117.1-1980, 1986). New York: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom, J. A., Malassigné, P. M., & Sanford, J. A. (1984). Development and evaluation of four shower prototypes. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Rehabilitation Engineering (Vol. 4, pp. 91–92). Arlington, VA: RESNA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clipson, C. (1993). Simulation for planning and design: A review of strategy and techniques. In R. W. Marans & D. Stokols (Eds.), Environmental simulation—policy and research issues (pp. 23–57). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czaja, S. J. (1984). Hand anthropometrics. Technical paper for U.S. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board. Washington, DC: U.S. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czaja, S., & Steinfeld, E. (1980). Human factors research with disabled children. Buffalo, NY: People’s Center for Housing Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faletti, M. (1984). Technology to adapt environments. Generations, 8, 35–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuerstein, M., Steinfeld, E., Sanford, J., & Shiro, S. G. (1987). Hands on architecture: A typology for designers and researchers. In EDRA18, the Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Environmental Design Research Association Annual Conference (pp. 115–120). Washington, DC: EDRA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiatt, L. (1989, March). Housing for the elderly workshop. Paper presented at the meeting of American Society on Aging, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küller, R., & Mikellides, B. (1993). Simulated studies of color, arousal, and comfort. In R. W. Marans & D. Stokols (Eds.), Environmental simulation: policy and research issues. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, R. J. (1993). Simulation and citizen participation: Theory, research, and practice. In R. W. Marans & D. Stokols (Eds.) Environmental simulation: policy and research issues (pp. 163–190). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. (1981). Door-use study. Ottawa: Division of Building Research, National Research Council, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mace, R., & Lasett, B. (1974). An illustrated handbook of the handicapped section of the North Carolina state building code. Raleigh: North Carolina State Department of Insurance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marans, R. W. (1993). A multimodal approach to full-scale simulation: Evaluating hospital room designs. In R. W. Marans & D. Stokols (Eds.), Environmental simulation: policy and research issues (pp. 113–131). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. (1966). Door handles for the disabled. Annals of Physical Medicine, 8(5), 180–183.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanford, J. A., & Steinfeld, E. (1987). Designing for orientation and safety. In Proceedings of the Annual Research Conference of the AIA/ACSA Council on Architectural Research. Washington, DC: AIA/ACSA Council on Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinfeld, E. (1988). Full scale modeling in architecture. Presentation at the Architectural Research Centers Consortium 1988 Conference. Champaign, IL: ARCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinfeld, E., & Shea, S. (1993). Enabling home environments: Identifying barriers to independence. Technology and Disability, 2(4), 69–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinfeld, E., Schroeder, S., Duncan, J., Faste, R., Chollet, D., Bishop, M., Wirth, P., & Cardell, P. (1979). Accessible buildings for people with walking and reaching limitations. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokols, D. (1993). Strategies of environmental simulation: Theoretical, methodological, and policy issues. In R. W. Marans & D. Stokols (Eds.) Environmental simulation: research and policy issues (pp. 3–21). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, W. (1980). Disability and building codes: A quantitative study. Tucson: Southwest Arthritis Center, University of Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sanford, J.A., Megrew, M.B. (1999). Using Environmental Simulation to Test the Validity of Code Requirements. In: Steinfeld, E., Danford, G.S. (eds) Enabling Environments. Plenum Series in Rehabilitation and Health. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4841-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4841-6_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7195-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4841-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics