Skip to main content

Rethinking Equity Theory

A Referent Cognitions Model

  • Chapter
Justice in Social Relations

Part of the book series: Critical Issues in Social Justice ((CISJ))

Abstract

Equity theory (Adams, 1965; Walster, Berscheid, & Walster, 1973) seems to have outlived its usefulness. Can it—should it—be revised or recon-ceptualized? This chapter argues that there is a basis for rethinking equity theory and that such an enterprise is a worthwhile precursor to further research on the psychology of injustice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, S., & Ruderman, M. (1983, August). The influence of procedural and distributive justice on organizational behavior. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Anaheim, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, W., & Susmilch, C. (1974). Comment on Lane and Messé’s confusing clarification of equity theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 400–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, W., McGinn, N. C., & Susmilch, C. (1980). Internal standards revisited: Effects of social comparisons and expectancies on judgments of fairness and satisfaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 426–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J. (in press). The predicament of organizational injustice: Interpersonal and affective processes. In B. ML Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83, 85–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis for distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, M. (1979). Options to injustice: Seeing other lights. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 10, 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S., & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social cognition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of “voice” and improvement on experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R. (1984a). Emerging issues in the social psychology of justice. In R. Folger (Ed.), The sense of injustice: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 3–24). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R. (1984b). Perceived injustice, referent cognitions, and the concept of comparison level. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 14, 88–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R. (1986). A referent cognitions theory of relative deprivation. In J. M. Olson, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Relative deprivation and social comparison: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 4, pp. 33–55). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R. (in press). Relative deprivation and referent cognitions: Reformulating the preconditions of resentment. In J. C. Masters & W. P. Smith (Eds.), Social comparison, relative deprivation, and social justice: Theoretical, empirical, and policy perspectives. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., & Greenberg, J. (1985). Procedural justice: An interpretive analysis of personnel systems. In K. Rowland & G. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 3, pp. 141–183). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., & Martin, C. (1985). Relative deprivation and referent cognitions: Distributive and procedural justice effects. Manuscript submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., & Rheaume, K. (1983). Roleplaying effects of likelihood and referent outcomes on relative deprivation. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 13, 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., Rheaume, K., & Martin, C. (1983). Relative deprivation and referent cognitions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 172–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., & Robinson, T. (1983). Relative deprivation and procedural justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 268–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furby, L. (1986). Psychology and justice. In R. L. Cohen (Ed.), Justice: Views from the social sciences. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice and loyalty: Responses to declines in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). Availability and the simulation heuristic. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Ed.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 201–208). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, I. M., & Messé, L. A. (1972). Distribution of insufficient, sufficient, and oversufficient rewards: A clarification of equity theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 228–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1974). Social psychology of justice and interpersonal attraction. In T. L. Huston (Ed.), Foundations of interpersonal attraction (pp. 331–351). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, G. S. (1976). Fairness in social relationships. In J. W. Thibaut, J. T. Spence, & R. C. Carson (Eds.), Contemporary topics in social psychology (pp. 211–239). Morris-town, NJ: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange; Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mark, M. M., & Cook, T. D. (1979). Relative deprivation: When does it lead to anger, achievement, or disengagement? Alternatives: Perspectives on Society and Environment, 8, 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark, M. M., & Folger, R. (1984). Responses to relative deprivation: A conceptual framework. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 192–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messé, L. A., & Lane, L M. (1974). Rediscovering the need for multiple operations: A reply to Austin and Susmilch. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 405–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messé, L. A., & Watts, B. L. (1983). Complex nature of the sense of fairness: Internal standards and social comparison as bases for reward evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 84–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miner, J.B. (1984, February). The unpaved road over the mountains: From theory to applications. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 21(2), 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, R. D. (1969). Equity theory: A review and critique. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4, 176–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reis, H. T. (1984). The multidimensionality of justice. In R. Folger (Ed.), The sense of injustice: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 25–61). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1978). A theory of procedure. California Law Review, 66, 541–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (1984). The role of perceived injustice in defendants’ evaluations of their courtroom experience. Law and Society Review, 18, 101–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Caine, A. (1981). The influence of outcomes and procedures upon satisfaction with formal leaders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 642–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Folger, R. (1980). Distributive and procedural aspects of satisfaction with citizen-police encounters. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 281–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., Rasinski, K., & Spodick, N. (1985). Influence of voice on satisfaction with leaders: Exploring the meaning of process control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 72–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G. W. (1973). New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 151–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1966). The concept of equity in the perception of pay. Administrative Science Quarterly, 11, 414–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E., & Nesset, B. (1968). Preferences among forms of equity. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3, 400–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Folger, R. (1986). Rethinking Equity Theory. In: Bierhoff, H.W., Cohen, R.L., Greenberg, J. (eds) Justice in Social Relations. Critical Issues in Social Justice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5059-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5059-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-5061-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-5059-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics