We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Skip to main content

Equality and Entitlement in Marriage

Benefits and Barriers

  • Chapter
Entitlement and the Affectional Bond

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Over the last two decades there has been a growing interest in the relative equality of men and women. At first, the focus centered on achieving equal opportunities for women in the paid labor force. More recently, attention has focused on the inequalities between husbands and wives in the sharing of the responsibilities of unpaid labor at home. Indeed, a recent Gallup Poll of 1,234 randomly selected adults from across the country found that 57% of the population now says that the ideal marriage is one in which both the husband and the wife have jobs and share in the responsibilities of child rearing and caring for the home (DeStefano & Colasanto, 1990).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bagarozzi, D. A. (1982). The effects of cohesiveness on distributive justice. Journal of Psychology, 110, 267–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R. F. (1976). Interaction process analysis; a method of the study of small groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman-Brindley, S., & Tavormina, J. B. (1978). Power relationships in families: A social-exchange perspective. Family Process, 17, 423–436.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, J. (1988). The bonds of love. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berheide, C. W. (1984). Women’s work in the home: Seems like old times. Marriage and Family Review, 7, 37–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berk, S. (1985). The gender factory: The apportionment of work in American households. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J. (1981). The good-provider role. American Psychologist, 36, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biernat, M., & Wortman, C. B. (1991). Sharing of home responsibilities between professionally employed women and their husbands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 844–860.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blood, R. O., & Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands and wives. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1983). American couples. New York: Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownmiller, S. (1984). Feminity. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cate, R., Lloyd, S., & Henton, J. (1985). The effect of equity, equality and reward level on the stability of students’ premarital relationships. Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 715–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cate, R., Lloyd, S., Henton, J., & Larson, J. (1982). Fairness and reward level as predictors of relationship satisfaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 177–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coverman, S., & Shelley, J. (1986). Change in men’s housework and child-care time, 1965–1975. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 413–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F. (1982). Relative deprivation and working women. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmarais, S., & Lerner, M. (1989). A new look at equity and outcomes as determinants of satisfaction in close relationships. Social Justice Research, 3, 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeStefano, L., & Colasanto, D. (1990). The gender gap in America: Unlike 1973, today most Americans think men have it better. Gallup Poll News Service, 54, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social psychological perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, F., Lussier, J. B., & Servis, L. J. (1993). Husbands at home: The predictors of paternal participation in childcare and housework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1154–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dindia, K., & Taynor, J. (1973). Communications with spouses and others. In P. Noller & M. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Perspectives on marital interaction (pp. 273–293). Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichenbaum, L., & Orbach, S. (1983). Understanding women: A feminist psychoanalytic perspective. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falbo, T., & Peplau, L. (1980). Power strategies in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 618–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrée, M. (1991). The gender division of labor in two-earner marriages. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 158–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, P. (1978). Interaction: The work women do. Social Problems, 25, 397–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (1956). The art of loving. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray-Little, B., & Burks, N. (1983). Power and satisfaction in marriage: A review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 513–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, J., & Steil, J. (1993). Social comparison in close relationships: with whom do women compare and why? Paper presented at the 1992 meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J. P., Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1986). Sex, power and influence tactics in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 102–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, J., & Spitze, G. (1983). Sex stratification, children, housework, and jobs. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, T., & Cate, R. (1979). Social exchange in intimate relationships. In M. Cook & G. Wilson (Eds.), Love and attraction: An international conference. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, J. (1986). The meaning of mutuality (Work in progress No. 23). Wellesley, MA: Wellesley College, Stone Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidder, L., Fagan, M., & Cohn, E. (1981). Giving and receiving: Social justice in close relationships. In M. Lerner & S. Lerner, (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior (pp. 235–259). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kipnis, D., Castell, P. J., Gergen, M., & Mauch, D. (1976). Metamorphic effects of power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 127–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kipnis, D., Cohn, E., & Catalno, R. (1979). Power and affection. Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, D. (1985). Communication patterns and egalitarian decision making in dual-career couples. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 49, 126–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamm, H., & Schwinger, T. (1983). Need consideration in allocation decisions: Is it just? Journal of Social Psychology, 119, 205–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamm, H., & Schwinger, T. (1980). Norms concerning distributive justice: Are needs taken into consideration in allocation decisions? Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 425–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange, S., & Worell. (1990). Satisfaction and commitment in lesbian and heterosexual relationships. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. (1987). Integrating societal and psychological rules of entitlement: The basic task of each societal actor and fundamental problem of the social sciences. Social Justice Research, 1, 107–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M., & Whitehead, L. A. (1980). Procedural justice viewed in the context of justice motive theory. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction (pp. 219–256). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Major, B. (1987). Gender, justice and the psychology of entitlement. In P. Shaver & C. Hendrick (Eds.), Sex and gender: Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 124–148). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, B., & Deaux, K. (1982). Individual differences in justice behavior. In J. Greenberg and R. L. Cohen (Eds.), Equity and justice in social behavior (pp. 43–76). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark, M. A., & Folger, F. (1984). Responses to relative deprivation: A conceptual framework. In P. Shaver & C. Hendrick (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 217–242). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. (1985). Satisfaction with intimate exchange: Gender-role differences and the impact of equity, equality and rewards. Sex Roles, 13, 597–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. (1988). Power, intimacy and the life story. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. (1975). Power: The inner experience. New York: Irvington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, J., Edwards, J., Acock, A. (1984). Satisfaction in intimate relationships as a function of inequality, inequity and outcomes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 347–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikula, G. (1980). On the role of justice in allocation decisions. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction (pp. 127–166). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. B. (1986). Toward a new psychology of women (2nd ed.). Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murstein, B., Cerreto, M., & MacDonald, M. (1977). A theory and investigation of the effect of exchange-orientation on marriage and friendship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 8, 543–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickols, K. S., & Metzen, E. J. (1982). Impact of wife’s employment upon husband’s housework. Journal of Family Issues, 3, 199–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyquist, L., Slivken, K., Spence, J., & Helmreich, R. (1985). Household responsibilities in middle-class couples: The contribution of demographic and personality variables. Sex Roles, 12, 15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. (1975). Distributive justice within and outside the family. Journal of Psychology, 90, 123–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philliber, W., & Hiller, D. (1983). Relative occupational attainments of spouses and later changes in marriage and wife’s work experience. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 161–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. (1985). Working wives, working husbands. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, C., Mirowsky, J., & Huber, J. (1983). Dividing work, sharing work, and in-between: Marriage patterns and depression. American Sociological Review, 48, 809–823.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, A., Steil, J., & Weinglass, J. (1988). Taking the traditional route: Some covert costs of traditional decisions for the married career woman. In R. Unger (Ed.), Representations: Social constructions of gender (pp. 212–221). Amityville, NY: Baywood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanzoni, J. H. (1979). Sex roles, women’s work, and marital conflict: A study of family change. Lexington, MA: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwinger, T. (1980). Just allocations of goods: Decisions among three principles. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interactions (pp. 95–126). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, M. (1980). Die Beurteilung der gerechtigkeit von Aufteilungsentscheidungen: Personale und situative Einflüsse. Unpublished diploma thesis, University of Trier. Reported in Mikula, G. (1981). Concepts of distributive justice in allocation decisions: A review of German-speaking countries. German Journal of Psychology, 5, 222–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steil, J. M. (1983). Marriage: An unequal partnership. In B. Wolman and G. Strieker (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 49–59). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Steil, J., & Makowski, D. (1989). Equity, equality and need: A study of the patterns and outcomes associated with their use in intimate relationships. Social Justice Research, 3 (2), 121–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steil, J., Makowski, D., & Ross, P. (1990). Equity, equality and need in marital relationships. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steil, J., Tuchman, B., & Deutsch, M. (1978). A study of the meanings of frustration and injustice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 393–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steil, J., & Turetsky, B. (1985). Is equal better? The relationship between marital equality and psychological symptomatology. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Applied Social Psychology Annual (pp. 73–95). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steil, J., & Weltman, K. (1990). Marital inequality: The importance of resources, personal attributes, and social norms on career valuing and the allocation of domestic responsibilities. Sex Roles, 24, 161–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taeuber, C. M. (1991). Statistical handbook on women in American. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L., & Walker, A. (1989). Gender in families: Women and men in marriage, work and parenthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 845–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanFossen, B. (1981). Sex differences in the mental health effects of spouse support and equity. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 22, 130–143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vannoy-Hiller, D. & Philliber, W. (1989). Equal Partners: Successful women in marriage. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanYperen, N., & Buunk, B. (1990). A longitudinal study of equity and satisfaction in intimate relationships. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 287–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanYperen, N., & Buunk, B. (1991). Sex-role attitudes, social comparison, and satisfaction with relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 169–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waller, W. (1938). The family: A dynamic interpretation. New York: Cordon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Traupman, J. (1978). Equity and premarital sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 82–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitcomb, J., & Steil, J. (1991). Equality. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G., & Clark, M. (1989). The communal/exchange distinction and some implications for understanding justice in families. Social Justice Research, 3, 77–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yankelovich, D. (1974). The meaning of work. In J. M. Rosow (Ed.), The worker and the job. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Steil, J.M. (1994). Equality and Entitlement in Marriage. In: Lerner, M.J., Mikula, G. (eds) Entitlement and the Affectional Bond. Critical Issues in Social Justice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0984-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0984-8_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-0986-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-0984-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics