Skip to main content

The Analysis of Cell Cycle, Proliferation, and Asymmetric Cell Division by Imaging Flow Cytometry

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Imaging Flow Cytometry

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1389))

Abstract

Measuring cellular DNA content by conventional flow cytometry (CFC) and fluorescent DNA-binding dyes is a highly robust method for analysing cell cycle distributions within heterogeneous populations. However, any conclusions drawn from single-parameter DNA analysis alone can often be confounded by the asynchronous nature of cell proliferation. We have shown that by combining fluorescent DNA stains with proliferation tracking dyes and antigenic staining for mitotic cells one can elucidate the division history and cell cycle position of any cell within an asynchronously dividing population. Furthermore if one applies this panel to an imaging flow cytometry (IFC) system then the spatial information allows resolution of the four main mitotic phases and the ability to study molecular distributions within these populations. We have employed such an approach to study the prevalence of asymmetric cell division (ACD) within activated immune cells by measuring the distribution of key fate determining molecules across the plane of cytokinesis in a high-throughput, objective, and internally controlled manner. Moreover the ability to perform high-resolution, temporal dissection of the cell division process lends itself perfectly to investigating the influence chemotherapeutic agents exert on the proliferative capacity of transformed cell lines. Here we describe the method in detail and its application to both ACD and general cell cycle analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kastan MB, Bartek J (2004) Cell-cycle checkpoints and cancer. Nature 432:316–323. doi:10.1038/nature03097, nature03097 [pii]

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vermeulen K, Van Bockstaele DR, Berneman ZN (2003) The cell cycle: a review of regulation, deregulation and therapeutic targets in cancer. Cell Prolif 36:131–149, doi:266 [pii]

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cairns J (1975) Mutation selection and the natural history of cancer. Nature 255:197–200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kusch J, Liakopoulos D, Barral Y (2003) Spindle asymmetry: a compass for the cell. Trends Cell Biol 13:562–569

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shen Q, Zhong W, Jan YN, Temple S (2002) Asymmetric Numb distribution is critical for asymmetric cell division of mouse cerebral cortical stem cells and neuroblasts. Development 129:4843–4853

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Arsenio J, Kakaradov B, Metz PJ, Kim SH, Yeo GW, Chang JT (2014) Early specification of CD8+ T lymphocyte fates during adaptive immunity revealed by single-cell gene-expression analyses. Nat Immunol 15:365–372

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Chang JT, Palanivel VR, Kinjyo I, Schambach F, Intlekofer AM, Banerjee A, Longworth SA, Vinup KE, Mrass P, Oliaro J, Killeen N, Orange JS, Russell SM, Weninger W, Reiner SL (2007) Asymmetric T lymphocyte division in the initiation of adaptive immune responses. Science 315:1687–1691

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. King CG, Koehli S, Hausmann B, Schmaler M, Zehn D, Palmer E (2012) T cell affinity regulates asymmetric division, effector cell differentiation, and tissue pathology. Immunity 37:709–720

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ciocca ML, Barnett BE, Burkhardt JK, Chang JT, Reiner SL (2012) Cutting edge: Asymmetric memory T cell division in response to rechallenge. J Immunol 188:4145–4148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Barnett BE, Ciocca ML, Goenka R, Barnett LG, Wu J, Laufer TM, Burkhardt JK, Cancro MP, Reiner SL (2012) Asymmetric B cell division in the germinal center reaction. Science 335:342–344

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lemaitre F, Moreau HD, Vedele L, Bousso P (2013) Phenotypic CD8+ T cell diversification occurs before, during, and after the first T cell division. J Immunol 191:1578–1585

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hawkins ED, Oliaro J, Kallies A, Belz GT, Filby A, Hogan T, Haynes N, Ramsbottom KM, Van Ham V, Kinwell T, Seddon B, Davies D, Tarlinton D, Lew AM, Humbert PO, Russell SM (2013) Regulation of asymmetric cell division and polarity by Scribble is not required for humoral immunity. Nat Commun 4:1801. doi:10.1038/ncomms2796

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Duffy KR, Wellard CJ, Markham JF, Zhou JH, Holmberg R, Hawkins ED, Hasbold J, Dowling MR, Hodgkin PD (2012) Activation-induced B cell fates are selected by intracellular stochastic competition. Science 335:338–341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gerlach C, Rohr JC, Perie L, van Rooij N, van Heijst JW, Velds A, Urbanus J, Naik SH, Jacobs H, Beltman JB, de Boer RJ, Schumacher TN (2013) Heterogeneous differentiation patterns of individual CD8+ T cells. Science 340:635–639

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Buchholz VR, Flossdorf M, Hensel I, Kretschmer L, Weissbrich B, Graf P, Verschoor A, Schiemann M, Hofer T, Busch DH (2013) Disparate individual fates compose robust CD8+ T cell immunity. Science 340:630–635

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Filby A, Perucha E, Summers H, Rees P, Chana P, Heck S, Lord GM, Davies D (2011) An imaging flow cytometric method for measuring cell division history and molecular symmetry during mitosis. Cytometry A 79A:496–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Thaunat O, Granja AG, Barral P, Filby A, Montaner B, Collinson L, Martinez-Martin N, Harwood NE, Bruckbauer A, Batista FD (2012) Asymmetric segregation of polarized antigen on B cell division shapes presentation capacity. Science 335:475–479

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Quah BJ, Parish CR (2012) New and improved methods for measuring lymphocyte proliferation in vitro and in vivo using CFSE-like fluorescent dyes. J Immunol Methods 379:1–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Begum J, Day W, Henderson C, Purewal S, Cerveira J, Summers H, Rees P, Davies D, Filby A (2013) A method for evaluating the use of fluorescent dyes to track proliferation in cell lines by dye dilution. Cytometry A 83:1085–1095

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ortyn WE, Hall BE, George TC, Frost K, Basiji DA, Perry DJ, Zimmerman CA, Coder D, Morrissey PJ (2006) Sensitivity measurement and compensation in spectral imaging. Cytometry A 69A:852–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Filby A, Davies D (2012) Reporting imaging flow cytometry data for publication: Why mask the detail? Cytometry A 81A:637–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lassailly F, Griessinger E, Bonnet D (2010) “Microenvironmental contaminations” induced by fluorescent lipophilic dyes used for noninvasive in vitro and in vivo cell tracking. Blood 115:5347–5354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Summers HD, Rees P, Holton MD, Rowan Brown M, Chappell SC, Smith PJ, Errington RJ (2011) Statistical analysis of nanoparticle dosing in a dynamic cellular system. Nat Nanotechnol. doi: nnano.2010.277 [pii] 10.1038/nnano.2010.277

    Google Scholar 

  24. Darzynkiewicz Z, Crissman H, Jacobberger JW (2004) Cytometry of the cell cycle: cycling through history. Cytometry A 58A:21–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ormerod MG, Kubbies M (1992) Cell cycle analysis of asynchronous cell populations by flow cytometry using bromodeoxyuridine label and Hoechst-propidium iodide stain. Cytometry 13:678–685

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Filby A, Seddon B, Kleczkowska J, Salmond R, Tomlinson P, Smida M, Lindquist JA, Schraven B, Zamoyska R (2007) Fyn regulates the duration of TCR engagement needed for commitment to effector function. J Immunol 179:4635–4644

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Luzyanina T, Cupovic J, Ludewig B, Bocharov G (2013) Mathematical models for CFSE labelled lymphocyte dynamics: asymmetry and time-lag in division. J Math Biol. doi:10.1007/s00285-013-0741-z

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bocharov G, Luzyanina T, Cupovic J, Ludewig B (2013) Asymmetry of Cell Division in CFSE-Based Lymphocyte Proliferation Analysis. Front Immunol 4:264. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2013.00264

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Darzynkiewicz Z, Crissman H, Traganos F, Steinkamp J (1982) Cell heterogeneity during the cell cycle. J Cell Physiol 113:465–474

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Niswander LM, McGrath KE, Kennedy JC, Palis J (2014) Improved quantitative analysis of primary bone marrow megakaryocytes utilizing imaging flow cytometry. Cytometry A 85A:302–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Shimoni R, Pham K, Yassin M, Ludford-Menting MJ, Gu M, Russell SM (2014) Normalized polarization ratios for the analysis of cell polarity. PLoS One 9, e99885. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0099885

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Ortyn WE, Perry DJ, Venkatachalam V, Liang L, Hall BE, Frost K, Basiji DA (2007) Extended depth of field imaging for high speed cell analysis. Cytometry A 71A:215–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Watson JV, Chambers SH, Smith PJ (1987) A pragmatic approach to the analysis of DNA histograms with a definable G1 peak. Cytometry 8:1–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

AF, WD, and SP were funded by CRUK. AF also acknowledges support from the ISAC SRL Emerging Leaders program. NMM acknowledges support from the Maria Sklowdowska-Curie Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Filby .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Filby, A., Day, W., Purewal, S., Martinez-Martin, N. (2016). The Analysis of Cell Cycle, Proliferation, and Asymmetric Cell Division by Imaging Flow Cytometry. In: Barteneva, N., Vorobjev, I. (eds) Imaging Flow Cytometry. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1389. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3302-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3302-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-3300-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-3302-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics