Skip to main content

Cotton Fiber Structure

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Cotton fibers have complex structures despite being composed almost exclusively of the molecule cellulose. Cellulose molecules, composed of d-glucose residues, are arranged in nano-sized crystals, or crystallites. The fundamental unit of the crystal is the unit cell that is repeated along its edges, along with the atoms inside, to create the entire crystal. Crystallites are grouped into microfibrils that, in turn, are clustered into sheet-like structures that wrap around the lumen or vacuole at various angles. These layers of primary wall sheets are themselves surrounded by a winding layer, the primary wall, and a cuticle. This chapter focuses on X-ray diffraction to interpret cotton fiber structure. Patterns are shown from electron diffraction, laboratory powder X-ray diffraction, and synchrotron X-ray diffraction for both single and bundled fibers. Single-fiber and fiber bundle patterns differ because of the varied angle of the microfibrils to the main fiber axis. The bundle patterns include many of the varied angles, but single fibers have just one major angle when a micron-sized X-ray beam is used. Also shown are computed diffraction patterns based on the known atom positions. Widely used methods for X-ray analysis are flawed. Instead, interpretations of the patterns can follow the logic of “what modifications are needed to the computed ideal pattern” so that it best resembles the experimental pattern. The Rietveld powder diffraction method refines variables such as crystallite size, unit cell dimensions, and amount of amorphous material. However, there are many other possible variables in Rietveld software, more than cotton data can support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The values of crystallite width and number of chains are based on measurements of diffraction pattern peak widths at the end of this chapter. The values were interpreted to give a “diamond-shaped” model. Krassig and Kappner’s length of 85 nm is longer than the 21.2 nm value indicated by the diffraction pattern in Fig. 2.10.

  2. 2.

    CAMD, the Center for Advanced Microstructures and Devices, is a facility of Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.

References

  • Abidi N, Manike M (2017) X-ray diffraction and FTIR investigations of cellulose deposition during cotton fiber development. Text Res J 88(7):719. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517516688634

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Abidi N, Cabrales L, Haigler CH (2014) Changes in the cell wall and cellulose content of developing cotton fibers investigated by FTIR spectroscopy. Carbohydr Polym 100:9–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bader RFW (1990) Atoms in molecules: a quantum theory, International series of monographs on chemistry. Oxford Clarendon Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark GL (1930) Cellulose as it is completely revealed by X-rays. Special application to the growth and classification of cotton, the structure of wood, and the manufacture of rayon. Ind Eng Chem 22:474–487

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dri FL, Hector LG Jr, Moon RJ, Zavattieri PD (2013) Anisotropy of the elastic properties of crystalline cellulose Iβ from first principles density functional theory with Van der Waals interactions. Cellulose 20:2703–2718

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes AN, Thomas LH, Altaner CM, Callow P, Forsyth VT, Apperley DC, Kennedy CJ, Jarvis MC (2011) Nanostructure of cellulose microfibrils in spruce wood. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:E1195–E1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French AD (2014) Idealized powder diffraction patterns for cellulose polymorphs. Cellulose 21:885–896

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • French AD, Santiago Cintrón M (2013) Cellulose polymorphy, crystallite size, and the segal crystallinity index. Cellulose 20:583–588

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • French AD, Concha M, Dowd MK, Stevens ED (2014) Electron (charge) density studies of cellulose models. Cellulose 21:1051–1063

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gessler K, Krauss N, Steiner T, Betzel B, Sarko A, Saenger W (1995) β-D-Cellotetraose hemihydrate as a structural model for cellulose II. An X-ray diffraction study. J Am Chem Soc 117:11397–11406

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goynes WR Jr. (2005) In search of the mystic cotton fiber maturity: a view from the microscope. Proceeding of Beltwide Cotton Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, pp 2212–2218

    Google Scholar 

  • Haigler CH, Rao NR, Roberts EM, Huang J-Y, Upchurch DR, Trolinder NL (1991) Cultured ovules as models for cotton fiber development under low temperatures. Plant Physiol 95:88–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Han YJ, Cho Y-J, Lambert WE, Bragg CK (1998) Identification and measurement of convolutions in cotton fiber using image analysis. Artif Intell Rev 12:201–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hock CW (1954) Microscopic structure. In: Ott E, Spurlin HM (eds) Cellulose and cellulose derivatives, part 1. Interscience, New York, pp 347–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Howsman JA, Sisson WA (1954) Submicroscopic structure. In: Ott E, Spurlin HM (eds) Cellulose and cellulose derivatives, part 1. Interscience, New York, pp 231–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalenius E, Kekalainen T, Neitola R, Beyeh K, Rissanen K, Vainiotalo P (2008) Size- and structure selective noncovalent recognition of saccharides by tetraethyl and tetraphenyl resorcinarenes in the gas phase. Chem Eur J 14:5220–5228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim HJ et al (2017) Comparative physical and chemical analyses of cotton fibers from two near isogenic upland lines differing in fiber wall thickness. Cellulose 24:2385–2401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim HJ, Liu Y, French AD, Lee CM, Kim SH (2018) Comparisons and validation of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic methods for monitoring secondary cell wall cellulose from cotton fibers. Cellulose 25:49–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kono H, Unoki S, Shikano T, Fujiwara M, Erata T, Takai M (2002) CP/MAS 13C NMR study of cellulose and cellulose derivatives. 1. Complete assignment of the CP/MAS 13C NMR spectrum of the native cellulose. J Am Chem Soc 124:7506–7511

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krässig H, Käppner W (1961) The morphological units in cotton linters. Makromol Chem 44:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee CM, Kubicki JD, Fan B, Zhong L, Jarvic MC, Kim SH (2015) Hydrogen-bonding network and OH stretch vibration of cellulose: comparison of computational modeling with polarized IR and SFG spectra. J Phys Chem B 119:15138–15149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Thibodeaux D, Gamble G, Bauer P, Van Derveer D (2012) Comparative investigation of Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction (XRD) in the determination of cotton fiber crystallinity. Appl Spectrosc 66:983–986

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Kim JI, Cusumano JC, Chapple C, Venugopalan N, Fischetti RF, Makowski L (2016) The impact of alterations in lignin deposition on cellulose organization of the plant cell wall. Biotechnol Biofuels 9:126–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nam S, French AD, Condon BD, Concha M (2016) Segal crystallinity index revisited by the simulation of X-ray diffraction patterns of cotton cellulose Iβ and cellulose II. Carbohydr Polym 135:1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nishiyama Y, Kuga S, Wada M, Takeshi O (1997) Cellulose microcrystal film of high uniaxial orientation. Macromolecules 30:6395–6397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishiyama Y, Johnson GP, French AD (2012) Diffraction from nonperiodic models of cellulose crystals. Cellulose 19:319–336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nishyama Y, Langan P, Chanzy H (2002) Crystal structure and hydrogen-bonding system in cellulose Iβ from synchrotron X-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. J Am Chem Soc 124:9074–9082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park S, Baker JO, Himmel ME, Parrilla PA, Johnson DK (2010) Cellulose crystallinity index: measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance. Biotechnol Biofuels 3:10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purves CB (1943) A historical survey. In: Ott E (ed) Cellulose and cellulose derivatives. Interscience, New York, pp 29–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajasekaran K, Muir AJ, Inbger BF, French AD (2006) A dehydration method for immature or wet cotton fibers for light and electron microscopy. Text Res J 76:514–518

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Santiago Cintrón M, Johnson GP, French AD (2011) Young’s modulus calculations for cellulose Iβ by MM3 and quantum mechanics. Cellulose 18:505–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE, Conrad CM (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-Ray diffractometer. Text Res J 29(10):786–794

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sisson WA (1935) X-ray studies of crystallite orientation in cellulose fibers. Ind Eng Chem 27:51–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sponsler OL, Dore WH (1926) The structure of ramie cellulose as derived from X-ray data, Colloid symposium monograph, vol IV. Chemical Catalog, New York, pp 174–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens ED, Dowd MK, Johnson GP, French AD (2010) Experimental and theoretical electron density distribution of α,α-trehalose dihydrate. Carbohydr Res 345:1469–1481

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sugiyama J, Vuong R, Chanzy H (1991) Electron diffraction study on the two crystalline phases occurring in native cellulose from an algal cell wall. Macromolecules 24:4168–4175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wakelyn PJ, Bertoniere NR, French AD, Thibodeaux DP, Triplett BA, Rousselle M-A, Goynes WR Jr, Edwards JV, Hunter L, McAlister DD, Gamble GR (2007) Cotton fiber chemistry and technology. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker PM, Nieduszynski IA, Atkins EDT (1974) Structural aspects of soda-cellulose II. Polymer 15:125–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wojdyr M (2010) Fityk: a general-purpose peak fitting program. J Appl Crystallogr 43:1126–1128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Wang T, Oehme D, Petridis L, Hong M, Kubicki JD (2018) Structural factors affecting 13C NMR chemical shifts of cellulose: a computational study. Cellulose 25:23–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Young RA (1995) Introduction to the Rietveld method. In: Young RA (ed) The Rietveld method. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Zugenmaier P (2008) Crystalline cellulose and cellulose derivatives. Characterization and structures. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alfred D. French .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

French, A.D., Kim, H.J. (2018). Cotton Fiber Structure. In: Fang, D. (eds) Cotton Fiber: Physics, Chemistry and Biology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00871-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics