Skip to main content

Applying a New Methodology to Measure Investment in R&D and Science and Technology Activities: The Case of Colombia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Analysis of Science, Technology, and Innovation in Emerging Economies

Abstract

Research and development (R&D), especially in industry and technology, is a crucial component of innovation, productivity and effectiveness, as well as the generation of new competitive advantages that are reflected in the whole economy of a country. In this context and with the aim of improving the measurement of R&D, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development updated the Frascati Manual in 2015 to provide the main, globally applicable guidelines for national statistical offices and policy-makers to analyze trends and allow for international comparisons of science, technology and innovation. In developing countries, it is particularly important to determine different strategies to guarantee adequate R&D to inform the creation of policies and instruments to effectively promote knowledge and generate technological solutions to local problems. This chapter describes the development and application of the Frascati Manual (2015) in Colombia to measure investments in R&D and other scientific, technological and innovation activities in Colombia from the perspective of the requirements of the manual for government, higher education, business enterprises, the health sector and private non-profit institutions with an update for the entire 2000–2017 period. The results indicate that the new guidelines for quantifying investments in R&D guarantee greater reliability through the use of mixed methods involving administrative registers or surveys and control mechanisms with budget analysis. Moreover, it is important to analyze differences among sectors to adequately determine the specific factors related to scientific, technological and innovation activities with the aim of establishing the investments and expenditures in science, technology and innovation. During the period of study, Colombia maintained constant investment with a slight increase in the last year that was mainly due to found royalties. The resulting indicators of expenditure in R&D and other scientific, technological and innovation activities can be used to monitor and evaluate relevant policies that have been implemented, as well as to make international comparisons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aksnes, D., Sivertsen, G., Leeuwen, D., & Wendt, K. (2017). Measuring the Productivity of National R&D Systems: Challenges in Cross-national Comparisons of R&D Input and Publication Output Indicators. Science and Public Policy, 44, 246–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. (1962). Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In Universities-National Bureau Committee for Economic Research, Committee on Economic Growth of the Social Science Research Council (Ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M., & Albu, M. (1999). Knowledge Systems and Technological Dynamism in Industrial Clusters in Developing Countries. World Development, 27, 1715–1734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B., & Sarewitz, D. (2011). Public Value Mapping and Science Policy Evaluation. Minerva, 49, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, Y. K. (2002). The Australian Growth Experience (1960–2000), R&D Based, Human Capital-based or Just Steady State Growth? Research Paper No. 855. Department of Economics, University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, M. (2007). R&D Spending in the High-tech Sector and Economic Growth. Research in Economics, 61, 140–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G7 Academies of Science. (2017). New Economic Growth: The Role of Science, Technology, Innovation and Infrastructure. G7 Academies’ Joint Statements 2017. Retrieved from https://royalsociety.org/~/media/about-us/international/g-science-statements/2017-may-3-new-economic-growth.pdf?la=en-GB

  • Gault, F. (2018). Defining and Measuring Innovation in All Sectors of the Economy. Research Policy, 47, 617–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gisselquist, D., & van der Meer, C. (2001). Regulations for Seed and Fertilizer Markets: A Good Policy Guide for Policy Makers (Rural Development Working Paper No. 22817). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goel, R. K., Payne, J. E., & Ram, R. (2008). R&D Expenditures and U.S. Economic Growth: A Disaggregated Approach. Journal of Policy Modeling, 30, 237–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossmann, V. (2007). How to Promote R&D-based Growth? Public Education Expenditure on Scientists and Engineers Versus R&D Subsidies. Journal of Macroeconomics, 29, 891–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann, R., & Hidalgo, C. (2011). The Network Structure of Economic Output. Journal of Economic Growth, 16, 309–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, J. C. (2009). Economic Research and Economic Growth: Evidence from East Asian Economies. Journal of Asian Economics, 20, 150–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. I. (2002). Sources of U.S. Economic Growth in a World of Ideas. The American Economic Review, 92, 220–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwack, S. U., & Lee, Y. S. (2006). Analyzing the Korea’s Growth Experience: The Application of R&D and Human Capital Based Growth Models with Demography. Journal of Asian Economics, 17, 818–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naseem, A., Spielman, D., & Were, S. (2010). Private-Sector Investment in R&D: A Review of Policy Options to Promote its Growth in Developing-Country Agriculture. Agribusiness, 26(1), 143–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OCyT. (2018). Indicators of Science and Technology Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2015). Frascati Manual. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/publications/frascati-manual-2015-9789264239012-en.htm

  • Salimi, N., & Rezaei, J. (2018). Evaluating Firms’ R & D Performance Using Best Worst Method. Evaluation and Program Planning, 66, 145–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. (2000). Innovation as a Systemic Phenomenon: Rethinking the Role of Policy. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 1, 73–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterlacchini, A. (2008). R&D, Higher Education and Regional Growth: Uneven Linkages Among European Regions. Research Policy, 37, 1096–1107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cotte Poveda, A., Andrade Parra, J., Pardo Martínez, C.I. (2019). Applying a New Methodology to Measure Investment in R&D and Science and Technology Activities: The Case of Colombia. In: Pardo Martínez, C., Cotte Poveda, A., Fletscher Moreno, S. (eds) Analysis of Science, Technology, and Innovation in Emerging Economies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13578-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13578-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13577-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-13578-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics