Skip to main content

Fragmented Solidarity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 219 Accesses

Part of the book series: Politics and Development of Contemporary China ((PDCC))

Abstract

This chapter discusses the third pillar of the psychic trap for labor movement—workers’ fragmented sense solidarity. It seeks to analyze several psychic factors underpinning a divided working class. Diminishing social trust amongst fellow workers is one of the fundamental obstacles that affect Chinese labor activism. The chapter goes on to examine, from a psychic perspective, why workers are risk-averse and unwilling to participate in collective industrial action. It then discusses workers’ unusual reaction to the loss of their leaders, as well as their sense of coalition building with other marginalized groups. Workers and activists’ differing sense of solidarity is highlighted throughout the chapter. Workers psychic state of solidarity is further explored in the case of Foowah factory in Shenzhen, where workers tried to organize a strike to protect their rights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beckwith, K. (2000). Hinges in collective action: Strategic innovation in the Pittston coal strike. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 5(2), 179–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, M., & Rochon, T. R. (2004). Interpersonal trust and the magnitude of protest: A micro and macro level approach. Comparative Political Studies, 37(4), 435–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1969). Collective behavior. In A. M. Lee (Eds.), Principles of sociology (pp. 165–220). New York: Barnes and Noble.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, A. (2018). The relationship between labour NGOs and Chinese workers in an authoritarian regime. Global Labour Journal, 9(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, N. (2002). Making sense of social movements. London: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Y., & O’Brien, K. J. (2013). Relational repression in China: Using social ties to demobilize protesters. The China Quarterly, 215, 533–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, D. (2017). Mobilizing without the masses: Control and contention in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganz, M. (2009). Why David sometimes wins: Leadership, organization, and strategy in the California farm worker movement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gries, P., & Rosen, S. (2010). Chinese politics: State, society and the market. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. A., & Benford, R. D. (2004). Collective identity, solidarity, and commitment. The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, 433, 57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasper, J. M., & Poulsen, J. D. (1995). Recruiting strangers and friends: Moral shocks and social networks in animal rights and anti-nuclear protests. Social Problems, 42(4), 493–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. C., & Perrow, C. (1977). Insurgency of the powerless: Farm worker movements (1946–1972). American Sociological Review, 42(2), 249–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. K., & Zhang, Y. (2013). The power of instability: Unraveling the micro foundations of bargained authoritarianism in China. American Journal of Sociology, 118(6), 1475–1508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D. (1988). Freedom summer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, E. J. (1993). Shanghai on strike: The politics of Chinese labor. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (2007, March). Trust networks in transnational migration. In Sociological forum (Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 3–24). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C., & Wood, L. J. (2009). Social movements, 1768–2008 (2nd ed.). Boulder: Paradigm Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, E. J., & Warland, R. H. (1983). Social movement involvement in the wake of a nuclear accident: Activists and free riders in the TMI area. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 764–780.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lin, J. (2020). Fragmented Solidarity. In: Chinese Politics and Labor Movements. Politics and Development of Contemporary China. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23902-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics