Skip to main content

Estimating Student’s Performance Based on Item Response Theory in a MOOC Environment with Peer Assessment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, 10th International Conference. Workshops (MIS4TEL 2020)

Abstract

Peer Assessment is a powerful strategy to support educational activities and the consequent learners’ success. Learning performance of participating is often estimated in a peer assessment setting using Item Response Theory. In this paper, a feasibility of estimating individual performance is examined for a simulated data set representing a MOOC environment, where one thousand students are supposed to perform a Peer Assessment session, where each peer assesses three other peers’ work. For each student the modeling traits “ability”, “consistency”, and “strictness” are evaluated using Generalized Partial Credit Model, and the validity of such calculation is confirmed. While taking into consideration the limits of the synthetic sample production, this experiment provides an evidence of the possibility to predict learning performance in the large scale learning conditions of a MOOC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alcarria, R., Bordel, B., deAndrés, D.M., Robles, T.: Enhanced peer assessment in MOOC evaluation through assignment and review analysis. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 13(1), 206–219 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker, F., Kim, S.H.: Item Response Theory: Parameter Estimation Techniques. Statistics, Textbooks and Monographs. Marcel Dekker, New York (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Bloom, B.S.: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. David McKay Company Inc., New York (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  4. De Marsico, M., Sciarrone, F., Sterbini, A., Temperini, M.: Supporting mediated peer-evaluation to grade answers to open-ended questions. EURASIA J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 13(4), 1085–1106 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fox, J.P.: Bayesian Item Response Modeling: Theory and Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. de Freitas, S.I., Morgan, J., Gibson, D.: Will MOOCs transform learning and teaching in higher education? engagement and course retention in online learning provision. Brit. J. Educ. Technol. 46(3), 455–471 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gelman, A., Rubin, D.B.: Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat. Sci. 7(4), 457–472 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoffman, M.D., Gelman, A.: The No-U-Turn sampler: adaptively setting path lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15, 1593–1623 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Jiang, Z., Carter, R.: Using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo to estimate the log-linear cognitive diagnosis model via Stan. Behav. Res. Methods 51(2), 651–662 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lord, F.: Applications of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems. Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Luo, Y., Jiao, H.: Using the stan program for bayesian item response theory. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 78(3), 384–408 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mitchell, T.M.: Machine Learning, 1st edn. David McKay, New York (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Muraki, E.: A generalized partial credit model. In: van der Linden, W.J., Hambleton, R.K. (eds.) Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory, pp. 153–164. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Patz, R.J., Junker, B.: Applications and extensions of MCMC in IRT: multiple item types, missing data, and rated responses. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 24, 342–366 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sciarrone, F., Temperini, M.: K-openanswer: a simulation environment to analyze the dynamics of massive open online courses in smart cities. Soft Computing (2020). In Press

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sciarrone, F., Temperini, M.: Simulating massive open on-line courses dynamics. In: Proceedings of iTHET 2019, Magdeburg, Germany, pp. 1–9 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sun, D.L., Harris, N., Walther, G., Baiocchi, M.: Peer assessment enhances student learning: the results of a matched randmized crossover experiment in a college statistics class. PLoS ONE 10(12), 1–7 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Uto, M.: Rater-effect IRT model integrating supervised LDA for accurate measurement of essay writing ability. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 494–506 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Uto, M., Ueno, M.: Item response theory for peer assessment. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 9(2), 157–170 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Uto, M., Ueno, M.: Empirical comparison of item response theory models with rater’s parameters. Heliyon 4, 1–32 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Uto, M., Ueno, M.: Item response theory without restriction of equal interval scale for rater’s score. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 363–368 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was partially supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), KAKEN (17H00825).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minoru Nakayama .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nakayama, M., Sciarrone, F., Uto, M., Temperini, M. (2021). Estimating Student’s Performance Based on Item Response Theory in a MOOC Environment with Peer Assessment. In: Kubincová, Z., Lancia, L., Popescu, E., Nakayama, M., Scarano, V., Gil, A. (eds) Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, 10th International Conference. Workshops. MIS4TEL 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1236. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52287-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics