Abstract
The study of bat acoustic signals requires specialized equipment with microphones capable of recording high frequencies. There has been growing interest in bat acoustics and a rapid evolution in ultrasonic recording equipment, from the pioneering work using detectors weighing several kilograms, to the current pocket-sized and open source recorders. The increasing accessibility of bat detectors has extended the field of bat acoustics from simple activity detection to acoustic species identification and experimental research. Traditional call analysis was based on multivariate statistical techniques such as discriminant function analysis. However, technological improvements have led to expanding knowledge regarding the complexity and versatility of bat echolocation, and have kindled the evolution of signal processing methods with new approaches (i.e. deep learning) and more powerful computational techniques. Free access to reference libraries that permit adequate and extensive algorithm comparisons have emerged as a cornerstone for the refinement of automated acoustic analysis. Acoustic surveys have provided important insights into the effects of anthropogenic activities and urbanization on bat activity and diversity. Understanding how human activities affect biodiversity is a crucial prerequisite for the development and application of effective species conservation programs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams AM, Jantzen MK, Hamilton RM et al (2012) Do you hear what I hear? Implications of detector selection for acoustic monitoring of bats. Methods Ecol Evol 3:992–998
Ahlen I, Pettersson L (1985) Improvements of portable systems for ultrasonic detection. Bat Res News 26:76
Armitage DW, Ober HK (2010) A comparison of supervised learning techniques in the classification of bat echolocation calls. Eco Inform 5(6):465–473
Bennett D, Russ J (2001) The bats of Madagascar: a field guide with descriptions of echolocation calls. Viper Press, Glossop
Biscardi SJ, Orprecio MB, Fenton MB et al (2004) Data, sample sizes and statistics affect the recognition of species of bats by their echolocation calls. Acta Chiropterol 6(2):347–363
Cadotte MW, Carscadden K, Mirotchnick N (2011) Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and service. J Appl Ecol 48(5):1079–1087
Collen A (2012) The evolution of echolocation. Dissertation, University College London
Fenton MB (1970) A technique for monitoring bat activity with results obtained from different environments in southern Ontario. Can J Zool 48(4):847–851
Fenton MB, Bell GP (1981) Recognition of species of insectivorous bats by their echolocation calls. J Mammal 62(2):233–243
Greif S, Yovel Y (2019) Using on-board sound recordings to infer behaviour of free-moving wild animals. J Exp Biol 222:jeb184689
Grinell AD, Gould E, Fenton MB (2016) A history of the study of echolocation. In: Fenton MB, Grinell AD, Popper AN et al (eds) Bat bioacoustics. ASA Press/Springer, New York, pp 1–24
Hill AP, Prince P, Snaddon JL et al (2019) AudioMoth: a low-cost acoustic device for monitoring biodiversity and the environment. Hardware X 6:e00073
Jennings N, Parsons S, Pocock MJO (2008) Human vs. machine: identification of bat species from their echolocation calls by humans and by artificial neural networks. J Zool 86:371–377
Jones G, Jacobs DS, Kunz TH et al (2009) Carpe noctem: the importance of bats as bioindicators. Endanger Species Res 8(23):93–115
Jones KE, Russ J, Bashta A-T et al (2013) Indicator bats program: a system for the global acoustic monitoring of bats. In: Collen B, Pettorelli N, Durant S et al (eds) Biodiversity monitoring and conservation: bridging the gaps between global commitment and local action. Wiley-Blackwell, London
Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE (2012) Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: NIPS’12 Proceedings of the 25th international on neural information processing systems, Nevada, 3–6 December 2012
Lemen C, Freeman PW, White JA, Andersen BR (2015) The problem of low agreement among automated identification programs for acoustical surveys of bats. West N Am Nat 75:218–225
Loeb SC, Rodhouse TJ, Ellison LE et al (2015) A plan for the north American bat monitoring program (NABat). United States Department of Agriculture, Asheville
Mac Aodha O, Gibb R, Barlow K et al (2018) Bat detective-deep learning tools for bat acoustic signal detection. PLoS Comput Biol 14(3):e1005995
MacSwiney GMC, Clarke FM, Racey PA (2008) What you see is not what you get: the role of ultrasonic detectors in increasing inventory completeness in Neotropical bat assemblages. J Appl Ecol 45(5):1364–1371
Monadjem A, Shapiro JT, Mtsetfwa F et al (2017) Acoustic call library and detection distances for bats of Swaziland. Acta Chiropterol 19(1):175–187
Novick A (1977) Acoustic orientation. In: Wimsatt WA (ed) Biology of bats, vol 3. Academic Press, New York, pp 74–287
Parsons S, Szewczak JM (2009) Detecting, recording, and analyzing the vocalizations of bats. In: Kunz TH, Parsons S (eds) Ecological and behavioral methods for the study of bats, 2nd edn. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 91–111
Penone C, Kerbiriou C, Julien J-F et al (2018) Body size information in large-scale acoustic bat databases. PeerJ 6:e5370
Pettersson L (2002) The properties of sound and bat detectors. In: Brigham RM, EKV K, Jones G, Parsons S, HJGA L (eds) Bat echolocation research tools, techniques and analyses. Bat Conservation International, Austin, TX, pp 9–12
Pierce GW, Griffin DR (1938) Experimental determination of supersonic notes emitted by bats. J Mammal 19:454–455
Rainho A, Amorim F, Marques JT et al (2012) Chave de identificação de vocalizações dos morcegos de Portugal continental, v. 2. Versão electrónica de 5 de Junho de 2011
Reinhold L, Law B, Ford G et al (2001) Key to the bat calls of south-east Queensland and north-east New South Wales. Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Brisbane
Russ J (2012) British bat calls: a guide to species identification. Pelagic Publishing, Exeter
Russo D, Voigt CC (2016) The use of automated identification of bat echolocation calls in acoustic monitoring: a cautionary note for a sound analysis. Ecol Indic 66:598–602
Simmons JA, Howell DJ, Suga N (1975) Information content of bat sonar echoes: recent research on echolocation in bats identifies some of the kinds of information conveyed by echoes of their sonar sounds. Am Sci 63(2):204–215
Simmons JA, Fenton MB, O’Farrell MJ (1979) Echolocation and pursuit of prey by bats. Science 203:16–21
Skowronski MD, Fenton MB (2009) Quantifying bat call detection performance of humans and machines. J Acoust Soc Am 125:513–521
Skowronski MD, Harris JG (2006) Acoustic detection and classification of microchiroptera using machine learning: lessons learned from automatic speech recognition. J Acoust Soc Am 119:1827–1833
Vaughan N, Jones G, Harris S (1997) Habitat use by bats (Chiroptera) assessed by means of a broad-band acoustic method. J Appl Ecol 34(3):716–730
Voigt CC, Kingston T (2016) Bats in the anthropocene. In: Voigt CC, Kingston T (eds) Bats in the anthropocene: conservation of bats in a changing world. Springer International Publishing AG Switzerland, pp 1–9
Walters CL, Freeman R, Dietz C et al (2012) A continental-scale tool for acoustic identification of European bats. J Appl Ecol 49:1064–1074
Walters CL, Collen A, Lucas T et al (2013) Challenges of using bioacoustics to globally monitor bats. In: Adams RA, Pedersen SC (eds) Bat evolution, ecology and conservation. Springer, New York, pp 479–499
Wolpert DH (2001) The supervised learning no-free-lunch theorems. In: Proceedings of the 6th online world conference on soft computing in industrial applications (WSC 2006), p 25–42
Zamora-Gutierrez V, Lopez-Gonzalez C, MacSwiney GMC et al (2016) Acoustic identification of Mexican bats based on taxonomic and ecological constraints on call design. Methods Ecol Evol 7:1082–1091
Zamora-Gutierrez V, Ortega J, Avila-Flores R et al (2020) The sonozotz project: assembling an echolocation calls library for bats in a megadiverse country. Ecol Evol 10:4928–4943
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 North American Society for Bat Research (NASBR)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zamora-Gutierrez, V., MacSwiney G., M.C., Martínez Balvanera, S., Robredo Esquivelzeta, E. (2021). The Evolution of Acoustic Methods for the Study of Bats. In: Lim, B.K., et al. 50 Years of Bat Research. Fascinating Life Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54727-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54727-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-54726-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-54727-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)