Skip to main content

The Evolution of Acoustic Methods for the Study of Bats

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
50 Years of Bat Research

Abstract

The study of bat acoustic signals requires specialized equipment with microphones capable of recording high frequencies. There has been growing interest in bat acoustics and a rapid evolution in ultrasonic recording equipment, from the pioneering work using detectors weighing several kilograms, to the current pocket-sized and open source recorders. The increasing accessibility of bat detectors has extended the field of bat acoustics from simple activity detection to acoustic species identification and experimental research. Traditional call analysis was based on multivariate statistical techniques such as discriminant function analysis. However, technological improvements have led to expanding knowledge regarding the complexity and versatility of bat echolocation, and have kindled the evolution of signal processing methods with new approaches (i.e. deep learning) and more powerful computational techniques. Free access to reference libraries that permit adequate and extensive algorithm comparisons have emerged as a cornerstone for the refinement of automated acoustic analysis. Acoustic surveys have provided important insights into the effects of anthropogenic activities and urbanization on bat activity and diversity. Understanding how human activities affect biodiversity is a crucial prerequisite for the development and application of effective species conservation programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams AM, Jantzen MK, Hamilton RM et al (2012) Do you hear what I hear? Implications of detector selection for acoustic monitoring of bats. Methods Ecol Evol 3:992–998

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlen I, Pettersson L (1985) Improvements of portable systems for ultrasonic detection. Bat Res News 26:76

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage DW, Ober HK (2010) A comparison of supervised learning techniques in the classification of bat echolocation calls. Eco Inform 5(6):465–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett D, Russ J (2001) The bats of Madagascar: a field guide with descriptions of echolocation calls. Viper Press, Glossop

    Google Scholar 

  • Biscardi SJ, Orprecio MB, Fenton MB et al (2004) Data, sample sizes and statistics affect the recognition of species of bats by their echolocation calls. Acta Chiropterol 6(2):347–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadotte MW, Carscadden K, Mirotchnick N (2011) Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and service. J Appl Ecol 48(5):1079–1087

    Google Scholar 

  • Collen A (2012) The evolution of echolocation. Dissertation, University College London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenton MB (1970) A technique for monitoring bat activity with results obtained from different environments in southern Ontario. Can J Zool 48(4):847–851

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenton MB, Bell GP (1981) Recognition of species of insectivorous bats by their echolocation calls. J Mammal 62(2):233–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Greif S, Yovel Y (2019) Using on-board sound recordings to infer behaviour of free-moving wild animals. J Exp Biol 222:jeb184689

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grinell AD, Gould E, Fenton MB (2016) A history of the study of echolocation. In: Fenton MB, Grinell AD, Popper AN et al (eds) Bat bioacoustics. ASA Press/Springer, New York, pp 1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill AP, Prince P, Snaddon JL et al (2019) AudioMoth: a low-cost acoustic device for monitoring biodiversity and the environment. Hardware X 6:e00073

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings N, Parsons S, Pocock MJO (2008) Human vs. machine: identification of bat species from their echolocation calls by humans and by artificial neural networks. J Zool 86:371–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones G, Jacobs DS, Kunz TH et al (2009) Carpe noctem: the importance of bats as bioindicators. Endanger Species Res 8(23):93–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones KE, Russ J, Bashta A-T et al (2013) Indicator bats program: a system for the global acoustic monitoring of bats. In: Collen B, Pettorelli N, Durant S et al (eds) Biodiversity monitoring and conservation: bridging the gaps between global commitment and local action. Wiley-Blackwell, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE (2012) Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: NIPS’12 Proceedings of the 25th international on neural information processing systems, Nevada, 3–6 December 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemen C, Freeman PW, White JA, Andersen BR (2015) The problem of low agreement among automated identification programs for acoustical surveys of bats. West N Am Nat 75:218–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeb SC, Rodhouse TJ, Ellison LE et al (2015) A plan for the north American bat monitoring program (NABat). United States Department of Agriculture, Asheville

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac Aodha O, Gibb R, Barlow K et al (2018) Bat detective-deep learning tools for bat acoustic signal detection. PLoS Comput Biol 14(3):e1005995

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • MacSwiney GMC, Clarke FM, Racey PA (2008) What you see is not what you get: the role of ultrasonic detectors in increasing inventory completeness in Neotropical bat assemblages. J Appl Ecol 45(5):1364–1371

    Google Scholar 

  • Monadjem A, Shapiro JT, Mtsetfwa F et al (2017) Acoustic call library and detection distances for bats of Swaziland. Acta Chiropterol 19(1):175–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Novick A (1977) Acoustic orientation. In: Wimsatt WA (ed) Biology of bats, vol 3. Academic Press, New York, pp 74–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons S, Szewczak JM (2009) Detecting, recording, and analyzing the vocalizations of bats. In: Kunz TH, Parsons S (eds) Ecological and behavioral methods for the study of bats, 2nd edn. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 91–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Penone C, Kerbiriou C, Julien J-F et al (2018) Body size information in large-scale acoustic bat databases. PeerJ 6:e5370

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pettersson L (2002) The properties of sound and bat detectors. In: Brigham RM, EKV K, Jones G, Parsons S, HJGA L (eds) Bat echolocation research tools, techniques and analyses. Bat Conservation International, Austin, TX, pp 9–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce GW, Griffin DR (1938) Experimental determination of supersonic notes emitted by bats. J Mammal 19:454–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainho A, Amorim F, Marques JT et al (2012) Chave de identificação de vocalizações dos morcegos de Portugal continental, v. 2. Versão electrónica de 5 de Junho de 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhold L, Law B, Ford G et al (2001) Key to the bat calls of south-east Queensland and north-east New South Wales. Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Russ J (2012) British bat calls: a guide to species identification. Pelagic Publishing, Exeter

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo D, Voigt CC (2016) The use of automated identification of bat echolocation calls in acoustic monitoring: a cautionary note for a sound analysis. Ecol Indic 66:598–602

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons JA, Howell DJ, Suga N (1975) Information content of bat sonar echoes: recent research on echolocation in bats identifies some of the kinds of information conveyed by echoes of their sonar sounds. Am Sci 63(2):204–215

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons JA, Fenton MB, O’Farrell MJ (1979) Echolocation and pursuit of prey by bats. Science 203:16–21

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skowronski MD, Fenton MB (2009) Quantifying bat call detection performance of humans and machines. J Acoust Soc Am 125:513–521

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skowronski MD, Harris JG (2006) Acoustic detection and classification of microchiroptera using machine learning: lessons learned from automatic speech recognition. J Acoust Soc Am 119:1827–1833

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan N, Jones G, Harris S (1997) Habitat use by bats (Chiroptera) assessed by means of a broad-band acoustic method. J Appl Ecol 34(3):716–730

    Google Scholar 

  • Voigt CC, Kingston T (2016) Bats in the anthropocene. In: Voigt CC, Kingston T (eds) Bats in the anthropocene: conservation of bats in a changing world. Springer International Publishing AG Switzerland, pp 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters CL, Freeman R, Dietz C et al (2012) A continental-scale tool for acoustic identification of European bats. J Appl Ecol 49:1064–1074

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters CL, Collen A, Lucas T et al (2013) Challenges of using bioacoustics to globally monitor bats. In: Adams RA, Pedersen SC (eds) Bat evolution, ecology and conservation. Springer, New York, pp 479–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert DH (2001) The supervised learning no-free-lunch theorems. In: Proceedings of the 6th online world conference on soft computing in industrial applications (WSC 2006), p 25–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamora-Gutierrez V, Lopez-Gonzalez C, MacSwiney GMC et al (2016) Acoustic identification of Mexican bats based on taxonomic and ecological constraints on call design. Methods Ecol Evol 7:1082–1091

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamora-Gutierrez V, Ortega J, Avila-Flores R et al (2020) The sonozotz project: assembling an echolocation calls library for bats in a megadiverse country. Ecol Evol 10:4928–4943

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 North American Society for Bat Research (NASBR)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zamora-Gutierrez, V., MacSwiney G., M.C., Martínez Balvanera, S., Robredo Esquivelzeta, E. (2021). The Evolution of Acoustic Methods for the Study of Bats. In: Lim, B.K., et al. 50 Years of Bat Research. Fascinating Life Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54727-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics