Skip to main content

The Magic Ring in Action: Social Environment and Sustainability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Magic Ring

Part of the book series: Contemporary Systems Thinking ((CST))

  • 408 Accesses

Abstract

In Chap. 6, we headed off on an ideal journey to learn to recognize and model the action of multiple Rings operating in various environments. I hope the reader has become aware that without the action of the Rings, without their ubiquitous magic presence everywhere in a world made up of interconnected variables, life, order, and progress could not exist. The aim of this chapter is to guide the reader as he continues this journey through the world of human populations that interact to self-control their dynamics, and as he subsequently moves on to the action of the Rings in our ecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We know nothing at all. All our knowledge is but the knowledge of schoolchildren. The real nature of things we shall never know (Albert Einstein).

    As this book deals with Control Systems considered from various points of view, a complete bibliography may appear to be boundless. Here I have only listed the works cited in the book. All the sites mentioned have been visited in April 2014. In order to make it easier for the reader to directly examine

References

We know nothing at all. All our knowledge is but the knowledge of schoolchildren. The real nature of things we shall never know (Albert Einstein).

As this book deals with Control Systems considered from various points of view, a complete bibliography may appear to be boundless. Here I have only listed the works cited in the book. All the sites mentioned have been visited in April 2014. In order to make it easier for the reader to directly examine

  • Adams, W. M. (2006). The future of sustainability: Re-thinking environment and development in the twenty-first century. http://iucn.org

  • Ahmed, E., Elgazzar, A. S., & Hegazi, A. S. (2005). An overview of complex adaptive systems. arXiv:nlin/0506059 [nlin.AO]. http://arxiv.org/abs/nlin/0506059v1

  • Allen, P. M. (1997). Cities & regions as self-organizing systems: Model of complexity. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1993). Knowledge for action. A guide to overcoming barriers to organizational change. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1979). The heart of enterprise. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biernat, M., & Kobrynowicz, D. (1997). Gender-and race-based standards of competence: Lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breventano, S. (1570). A history of antiquity, nobility, and of notable things of the city of Pavia [original: Istoria della antichità, nobiltà, et delle cose notabili della città di Pavia]. Pavia: Hieronimo Bartholi, MDLXX. http://books.google.it/books?id=_CQ8AAAAcAAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=it&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q=torri&f=false

  • Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our common future. United Nations General Assembly. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED)—The “Brundtland Commission”, Future. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, W. (2000). Project tools for leading organizational change. Wheat Ridge: Executive Leadership Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • CASG, Complex Adaptive Systems Group. (2013). http://www.cas-group.net

  • Castelfranchi, C. (1998). Through the minds of the agents. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 1(1), 1–5. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/1/1/5.html

  • Christen, M., & Schmidt, S. (2012). A formal framework for conceptions of sustainability—A theoretical contribution to the discourse in sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 20(6), 400–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Club of Rome. (1972). The limits to growth. A Potomae Associates Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conte, R., & Paolucci, M. (2001). Intelligent social learning. JASSS Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/4/1/3.html

  • Costanza, R., & Patten, B. C. (1995). Defining and predicting sustainability. Ecological Economics, 15(3), 193–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (1949). Human society. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. C., & Robinson, D. N. (1984). The wonder of being human. Our brain & our mind. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethnologue, Languages of the World. (2013). http://www.ethnologue.com/ethno_docs/distribution.asp?by = area

  • Ferber, M., & Nelson, J. (1993, last ed. 2020). Feminist economics today: Beyond economic man. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W. (1983). Foreward. In N. Roberts, D. Andersen, M. S. Garet, W. A. Shaffer, & R. M. Deal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell-Mann, M. (1992). Complexity and complex adaptive systems. In The evolution of human languages. Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, 11 (pp. 3–18). Redwood City: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell-Mann, M. (1994). The quark and the jaguar. New York: W. H. Freeman.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gell-Mann, M. (1995). What is complexity? Complexity, 1(1), 16–19.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gendered Innovations. (2020, online). Stereotypes. Stanford: Stanford University. https://genderedinnovations.stanford.edu/terms/stereotypes.html

  • Gilbert, N. (1995). Simulation: An emergent perspective. In Conference on new technologies in the social sciences (pp. 27–29). Bournemouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, N., & Troitzsch, K. G. (1999). Simulation for the social scientist. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.). (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffee, R., & Jones, G. (1998). The character of a corporation: How your company’s culture can make or break your business. London: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, S. (2005). Enterprise-wide change: Superior results through systems thinking. San Francisco: Pfeiffer-John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (1995). Developing relationships in business networks. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1985). An ecolate view of the human predicament. www.garretthardinsociety.org/articles/art_ecolate_view_human_predicament.html

  • Hatch, M. J., & Cunliffe, A. L. (2013). Organization theory: Modern, symbolic and postmodern perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, R. B., & Jaikumar, R. (1988). Manufacturing’s crisis: New technologies, obsolete organizations. Harvard Business Review, 66(5), 77–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hentschel, T., Heilman, M. E., & Peus, C. V. (2019). The multiple dimensions of gender stereotypes: A current look at men’s and women’s characterizations of others and themselves. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 11. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00011/full

  • Heylighen, F. (2013). The global superorganism: An evolutionary-cybernetic model of the emerging network society. www.txtshr.com/computers/11212/index.html

  • Hiatt, J. M. (2006). ADKAR: A model for change in business, government and our community. Loveland: Prosci Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. H. (1995). Hidden order. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler, B., & Wilson, E. O. (1990). The ants. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hudak, M. A. (1993). Gender schema theory revisited: Men's stereotypes of American women. Sex Roles, 28(5–6), 279–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, A. E. (1988). The economics of regulation: Principles and institutions. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, S. (2018). The terrifying power of stereotypes – And how to deal with them. The conversation. https://theconversation.com/the-terrifying-power-of-stereotypes-and-how-to-deal-with-them-101904

  • Kanter, R. M. (2012). Ten reasons people resist change. Harvard Business Review, 74. https://hbr.org/2012/09/ten-reasons-people-resist-chang

  • Kauffman, S. A. (1993). The origins of order: Self organization and selection in evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. A. (1996). At home in the universe: The search for laws of complexity. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koestler, A. (1967). The ghost in the machine. London: Arkana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 86, 97–103. https://hbr.org/1995/05/leading-change-why-transformation-efforts-fail-2

  • Kotter, J. P. (1996, 2nd ed. 2012). Leading change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2002). The leadership challenge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazear, E. P., & Rosen, S. (1981). Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 841–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1947a). Frontiers in group dynamics. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers (pp. 188–237). London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1947b). Group decisions and social change. In T. M. Newcomb & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 197–211). New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. P., Simons, G. F., & Fennig, C. D. (Eds.). (2013). Ethnologue: Languages of the world. Dallas: SIL International. http://www.ethnologue.com/ethno_docs/distribution.asp?by = area

  • Liguori, M. (2012). The supremacy of the sequence: Key elements and dimensions in the process of change. Organization Studies, 33(4), 507–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippmann, W. (1922, online). Public opinion. https://books.google.it/books?id=fqpEWJHEzIkC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Lippmann+public+opinion&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj13YHA9KHqAhVHmYsKHVlzD8oQ6AEwAHoECAAQAg#v=onepage&q=Lippmann%20public%20opinion&f=false

  • Maturana, H. R., & Guiloff, G. (1980). The quest for the intelligence of intelligence. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 3(2), 135–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980, 1st ed, 1972). Autopoiesis and cognition. The realization of living. Boston: Reidel Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mella, P. (2006). Spatial co-localisation of firms and entrepreneurial dynamics: The combinatory system view. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2(3), 391–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mella, P. (2012). Systems thinking: Intelligence in action. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mella, P. (2017). The Combinatory Systems theory. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Monod, J. (1970). Chance and necessity: Essay on the natural philosophy of modern biology [original: Le hazard et la nécéssité]. New York: Vintage Books (1972). (original: Paris: Seuil).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickols, F. (2010). Change management 101. A primer. http://www.nickols.us/change.pdf

  • Nickols, F. (2011). Change management as problem finding and problem solving. www.odnetwork.org/publications/seasonings/samples/article_nickols.php

  • Osborn, A. F. A. (1953). Applied imagination: The principles and procedures of creative thinking. New York: Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1971). The system of modern societies. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. (1999). Economics and environment: Essays on ecological economics and sustainable development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pentland, B. T., & Feldman, M. S. (2008). Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action. Information and Organization, 18(4), 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, M. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2004). Theories of organizational change and innovation processes. In Handbook of organizational change and innovation (pp. 374–397).

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (2008). On competition (Updated and expanded edition). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, A., & Georgeff, M. (1992). Social plans: Preliminary report. In E. Werner & C. Castelfranchi (Eds.), Decentralized AI 3, proceedings of MAAMAW‘91. Amsterdam: Elsevier North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, S. P. (1987). Organization theory: Structure, design, and applications. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968, expanded ed. 2003). Pygmalion in the classroom. Crown House Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1990). Organizational culture. American Psychological Association, 45(2), 109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1992, last ed. 2010). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, V. E., Mueller, R., Lituchy, T., & Liu, J. (1996). Think manager—Think male: A global phenomenon? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17(1), 33–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiebinger, L. (2014). Gendered innovations: Harnessing the creative power of sex and gender analysis to discover new ideas and develop new technologies. Triple Helix, 1(1), 1–17.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Segre, S. (2012). Talcott parsons: An introduction. Lanham: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (2006, 1st ed. 1990). The fifth discipline: The Art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency (last edition, revised and enlarged).

    Google Scholar 

  • SHRM. (2020). Managing organizational change. https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/tools-and-samples/toolkits/pages/managingorganizationalchange.aspx

  • Söderbaum, P. (2008). Understanding sustainability economics: Towards pluralism in economics. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spelta, A. M. (1602). History written by Antonio Maria Spelta, citizen of Pavia [original: Historia d'Antonio Maria Spelta, Cittadino Pavese]. Pavia: Pietro Bartoli, MDCII (Library of the University of Pavia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, C. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valian, V. (1999). Why so slow?: The advancement of women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • von der Pütten, J. C. (2008). Moral issues and concerns about China’s one-child policy: A cosmopolitan perspective. Norderstedt: GRIN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldrop, M. M. (1992). Complexity. The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. New York: Simon & Shuster.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, R., Jr., Peters, T., & Phillips, J. R. (1980). Structure is not organization. Business Horizons, 23(3), 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P., Weakland, J. H., & Fisch, R. (1974). Change: Principles of problem formation and problem resolution. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, N. (1961, 1st ed. 1948). Cybernetics: Or control and communication in the animal and the machine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia. (2020). Nelson rules. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nelson_rules

  • Wooldridge, M., & Jennings, N. R. (1994, August). Toward a theory of cooperative problem solving. In Proceedings of the 6th European workshop on modelling autonomous agents in a multi-agent world. Odense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuradelli, C. (1888). The towers of Pavia [original: Le torri di Pavia]. Pavia: Tipografia F.lli Fusi (Library of the University of Pavia).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mella, P. (2021). The Magic Ring in Action: Social Environment and Sustainability. In: The Magic Ring. Contemporary Systems Thinking. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64194-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics