Abstract
By analyzing data from two catalogs of seismicity, one local and one regional, examples are drawn that demonstrate artificial seismicity patterns which can arise when changes in magnitude reporting or in detection ability are introduced by changes in operating procedures of a seismic network. In the first case, a catalog which comprises seismic data from Guerrero, Mexico, is revised and a correction is applied to magnitudes suspected of being affected by different operative practices. Next, several time windows are analyzed which compare the seismicity rate within the window to that of the total record mapped as a function of space. The same procedure is applied to the original (i.e., uncorrected) catalog. A significant seismic quiescence apparent in the original data set in the center of the seismic network all but disappears in the corrected data, indicating that this anomaly is not naturally induced. In the second case, we investigate the homogeneity of seismicity reporting for the Interior of Alaska. We computed the standard deviate z as a function of time by comparing the overall seismicity rate with the rate in a 3-year window. The maps z-values were inspected for all times. The most outstanding rate change is found around 1992.5. Since the b-value remained unchanged, the most reasonable explanation for the observed rate change around mid-1992 is a decrease in the detection ability of the network in the Interior of Alaska. Both case studies demonstrate the usefulness of systematic comparisons of the cumulative and noncumulative frequency-magnitude distribution, and of spatial and temporal mapping of the seismicity rates as a tool to investigate the homogeneity of earthquake reporting.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bufe, C. G., Nishenko, S. P., and Varnes, D. J. (1994), Seismicity Trends and Potential for Large Earthquakes in the Alaska-Aleutian Region, Pure appl. geophys. 142, 83–99.
Dieterich, J. H. (1994), A Constitutive Law for Rate of Earthquake Production and its Application to Earthquake Clustering, J. Geophys. Res. 99, 2601–2618.
Dieterich, J. H., and Okubo, P. G. (1996), An Unusual Pattern of Seismic Quiescence at Kalapana, Hawaii, Geophys. Res. Letts. 23, 447–450.
Fletcher, H. J., and Christensen, D. H. (1996), A Determination of Source Properties of Large Intraplate Earthquakes in Alaska, Pure appl. geophys. 146, 21–41.
Frohlich, C., and Davis, S. D. (1993), Teleseismic b-values; or, much ado about 1.0, J. Geophys. Res. 98, 631–644.
Habermann, R. E., and Creamer, F. (1994), Catalog Errors and the M 8 Earthquake Prediction Algorithm, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 84, 1551–1559.
Habermann, R. E. (1982), Consistency of Teleseismic Reporting since 1963, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 72, 93–112.
Habermann, R. E. (1983), Teleseismic Detection in the Aleutian Island Arc, J. Geophys. Res. 88, 5056–5064.
Habermann, R. E. (1987), Man-made Changes of Seismicity Rates, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 77, 141–159.
Habermann, R. E. (1991), Seismicity Rate Variations and Systematic Changes in Magnitudes in Teleseismic Catalogs, Tectonophys. 193, 277–289.
Lindquist, K. (1998), Seismic Array Processing and Computational Infrastructure for Improved Monitoring of Alaskan and Aleutian Seismicity and Volcanoes, University of Alaska, Fairbanks.
Kato, N., Ohtake, M., and Hirasawa, T. (1997), Possible Mechanism of Precursory Seismic Quiescence: Regional Stress Relaxation due to Preseismic Sliding, Pure appl. geophys. 150, 249–267.
Keilis-Borok, V. I., and Kossobokov, V. G. (1990), Premonitory Activation of Earthquake Flow: Algorithm M 8, Phys. Earth Plan. Int. 61, 73–83.
Kossosokov, V. G., and Carlson, J. M. (1995), Active Zone Size versus Activity: A Study of Different Seismicity Patterns in the Context of the Prediction Algorithm M 8, J. Geophys. Res. 100, 6431–6441.
Lahr, J. C. (1989), HYPOELLIPSE/version 2.00: A Computer Program for Determining Local Earthquakes Hypocentral Parameters, Magnitude, and First Motion Pattern, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open-File Rep. 89–116.
Page, R. A., Plafker, G., and Pulpan, H. (1995), Block Rotation in East-central Alaska: A Framework for Evaluation Earthquake Potential, Geology 23, 629–632.
Perez, O. J., and Scholz, C. H. (1984), Heterogeneity of the Instrumental Seismicity Catalog (19041980) for Strong Shallow Earthquakes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 74, 669–686.
Reasenberg, P. A. (1985), Second-order Moment of Central California Seismicity, J. Geophys. Res. 90, 5479–5495.
Reasenberg, P. A., and Matthews, M. V. (1988), Precursory Seismic Quiescence: A Preliminary Assessment of the Hypothesis, Pure appl. geophys. 126, 373–406.
SuÁRez, G., Monfret, T., Wittlinger, G., and David, C. (1990), Geometry of Subduction and Depth of the Seismogenic Zone in the Guerrero Gap, Mexico, Nature 345, 336–338.
Varnes, D. J. (1989), Predicting Earthquakes by Analyzing Accelerating Precursory Seismic Activity, Pure appl. geophys. 130, 661–686.
Wiemer, S., and Wyss, M. (1994), Seismic Quiescence before the Landers (M = 7.5) and Big Bear (M= 6.5) 1992 Earthquakes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 84, 900–916.
Wyss, M. (1991), Reporting History of the Central Aleutians Seismograph Network and the Quiescence Preceding the 1986 Andreanof Island Earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 81, 1231–1254.
Wyss, M. (1997), Nomination of Precursory Seismic Quiescence as a Significant Precursor, Pure appl. geophys. 149, 79–114.
Wyss, M., Shimazaki, K., and Urabe, T. (1996), Quantitative Mapping of a Precursory Quiescence to the Izu-Oshima 1990 (M = 6.5) Earthquake, Japan, Geophys. J. Int. 127, 735–743.
Wyss, M., and Wiemer, S. (1997), Two Current Seismic Quiescences within 40 km of Tokyo, Geophys. J. Int. 128, 459–473.
ZÚÑiga, F. R. (1989), A Study of the Homogeneity of the NOAA Earthquake Data File in the Mid-America Region by the Magnitude Signature Technique, Geofísica Internacional 28, 103–119.
ZÚÑIGA, F. R., and Wyss, M. (1995), Inadvertent Changes in Magnitude Reported in Earthquake Catalogs: Their Evaluation Through b-value Estimates, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 85, 1858–1866.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Birkhäuser Verlag
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zúñiga, F.R., Wiemer, S. (1999). Seismicity Patterns: Are they Always Related to Natural Causes?. In: Wyss, M., Shimazaki, K., Ito, A. (eds) Seismicity Patterns, their Statistical Significance and Physical Meaning. Pageoph Topical Volumes. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8677-2_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8677-2_24
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel
Print ISBN: 978-3-7643-6209-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-8677-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive