Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Knowledge as a Driver of Technological Change and Regional Growth Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2013 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

4. The Role of Intra-, Inter-, and Extra-Regional Sources of Knowledge Spillovers. The Evidence of High-Tech Industries

verfasst von : Małgorzata Runiewicz-Wardyn

Erschienen in: Knowledge Flows, Technological Change and Regional Growth in the European Union

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

While Chap.​ 3 focused on RIS and local or intra-regional drivers of the regional innovation processes, this chapter aims to investigate inter- and extra-regional knowledge spillovers across EU regions. Inspired by the previously discussed literature in Chap.​ 1 and by factual innovation trends in the EU presented in Chap.​ 2, this chapter aims to investigate geographically and technologically determined knowledge spillovers among European regions and thus contribute to the understanding of the diffusion processes of innovation and knowledge in space. The inflow of R&D spillovers from extra- and inter-regional sources may be an important additional source of technological advantage for many regions.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel The Efficiency of Regional Innovation Systems (RIS). The Role of High-Tech Industry and Knowledge-Intensive Services
Nächstes Kapitel Localized Knowledge Spillovers, Agglomeration Externalities, and Technological Dynamics in High-Tech Industries. Evidence Based on the EU Regions
Fußnoten
1
The main goal of the ERA is to strengthen networking between research partners and across research disciplines as well as to link geographically-distant centers of excellence and to disseminate knowledge across Europe. Data on research networks financed by the EU within the different FP are publicly available through the CORDIS.
 
2
The knowledge spillovers matrix was based on Greunz (2003).
 
3
The respondents were approached by a personal contact, email, and a phone call.
 
4
Bertolotti (2005) refers to lasers as one of the most important scientific inventions of the twentieth century, with a great variety of applications that include range finding and transmission and storage of information, material processing, printing, and medical technology.
 
Literatur
Almeida P, Kogut B (1999) Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Manag Sci 45(7):905–917CrossRef
Anselin L, Varga A, Acs Z (1997) Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. J Urban Econ 42(3):422–448CrossRef
Audretsch DB, Stephan PE (1996) Company − scientist locational links: the case of biotechnology. Am Econ Rev 86(3):641–652
Bania N, Eberts RW, Fogarty MS (1993) Universities and the startup of new companies: can we generalize from Route 128 and Silicon Valley. Rev Econ Stat 75(4):761–766CrossRef
Baptista R (2001) Geographical clusters and innovation diffusion. Technol Forecast Soc Change 66(1):31–46CrossRef
Breschi S, Cusmano L (2004) Unveiling the texture of a European research area: emergence of oligarchic networks under EU framework programmes. Int J Technol Manag 27(8):747–772CrossRef
Breschi S, Lissoni F (2001) Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: a critical survey. Ind Corp Change 10(4):975–1005CrossRef
Feldman MP (1994) The geography of innovation. Kluwer Academic, BostonCrossRef
Greunz L (2003) The technology gap and European regional growth dynamics. ULB Institutional Repository 2013/9485. Universite Libre de Bruxelles
Griffith R, Lee S, Van Reenen J (2011) Is distance dying at last? Falling home bias in fixed-effects models of patent citations. Quant Econ 2(2):211–249, ISSN 1759–7323CrossRef
Griliches Z (1979) Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell J Econ 10(1):92–116CrossRef
Jaffe AB (1986) Technological opportunity and spillovers from R&D: evidence from firms’ patents, profits, and market value. Am Econ Rev 76(5):984–1001
Jaffe AB (1989) Real effects of academic research. Am Econ Rev 79(5):957–970
Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (1996) Flows of knowledge from universities and federal labs. NBER Work Pap 5712:1–18
Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge flows as evidenced by patent citations. Q J Econ 108:577–598CrossRef
Johnson DKN, Siripong N, Brown A (2002b) The demise of distance? The declining role of physical distance in knowledge transmission. Wellesley College Department of Economics working paper, Wellesley, Sept 2002
Knudsen B, Florida R, Gates G, Stolarick K (2007) Urban density, creativity and innovation. Working paper, The Martin Prosperity Institute, University of Toronto
Maurseth PB, Verspagen B (2002) Knowledge spillovers in Europe: a patent citations analysis. Scand J Econ 104(4):531–545CrossRef
Parent O, Riou S (2005) Bayesian analysis of knowledge spillovers in European regions. J Reg Sci 45(4):747–775CrossRef
Rodriguez-Pose A, Crescenzi R (2006) R&D, spillovers, innovation systems and the genesis of regional growth in Europe. ERSA conference papers. European Regional Science Association, p 371
Roediger-Schluga T, Barber MJ (2006) The structure of R&D collaboration networks in the European Framework Programmes. UNU-MERIT working paper, 2006–036
Smith PJ (1999) Do knowledge spillovers contribute to U.S. state output and growth? J Urban Econ 45:331–353CrossRef
von Hippel E (1998) Economics of product development by users: the impact of ‘sticky’ local information. Manag Sci 44(5):629–644CrossRef
Zucker LG, Darby MD, Armstrong J (1998) Geographically localized knowledge: spillovers or markets? Econ Inq 36(1):65–86CrossRef
Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (1998) International knowledge flows: evidence from patent citations. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge
Saxenian AL (2006) The new argonauts: regional advantage in a global economy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Glaeser EW (2000) The new economics of urban and regional growth, In: Clark G, Gertler M, Feldman M (eds) The Oxford handbook of economic geography, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 83–98
Sonn JW, Storper M (2005) The increasing importance of geographical proximity in technological innovation: an analysis of U.S. patent citations, 1975–1997. Mimeo
Acs Z, Anselin L, Varga A (2002) Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Res Policy J 31:1069–1085, ElsevierCrossRef
Beal B, Gimeno J (2002) Geographic agglomeration, knowledge spillovers and competitive evolution. INSEAD Working paper, 2001/26/SM
Harabi N (1997) Channels of R&D spillovers: an empirical investigation of Swiss firms. Technovation J 17(11/12):627–635CrossRef
Piergiovanni R, Santarelli E (2001) Patents and the geographic localization of R&D spillovers in French manufacturing. Reg Stud J 35:697–702, Taylor&FrancisCrossRef
Castells M (1996) The rise of the network society. Blackwell, Oxford
Cairncross F (1997) The death of distance. Harvard Business Press, Cambridge
Ponds R, Van Oort F, Frenken K (2007) The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration. Reg Sci J 86(3):423–443, Taylor&Francis
Singh J (2005) Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Manag Sci J 51(5):756–770, published by Institute for Operations Research and the Management SciencesCrossRef
Grossetti M, Bes MP (2003) Dynamique de reseau et des cercles. Encastrements et decouplages. Journal of Revue d'Economie Industrielle, Numero special sur la morphogenese des reseaux 103(2):43–58CrossRef
Autant-Bernard C, Billand P, Frachisse D, Massard N (2007) Social distance versus spatial distance in R&D cooperation: empirical evidence from European collaboration choices in micro and nanotechnologies. Pap Reg Sci 86:495–519, SpringerCrossRef
Sjöholm F (1996) International transfer of knowledge: the role of international trade and geographic proximity. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 132:97–115CrossRef
Sjöholm F (1997) Knowledge inflow to Sweden: does geography and international trade matter? In: Fagerberg J, Hansson P, Lundberg L, Melchior A (eds) Technology and international trade. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Paci R, Usai S (1999) The role of specialisation and diversity externalities in the agglomeration of innovative activities, Working Paper CRENoS 15, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia
Döring T, Schnellenbach J (2006) What do we know about geographical knowledge spillovers and regional growth? A survey of the literature. Reg Stud J 40:375–395, Taylor&FrancisCrossRef
Maggioni MA, Nosvelli M, Uberti TE (2007) Space vs. networks in the geography of innovation: a European analysis. Pap Reg Sci 86(3):471–493CrossRef
Hoekman J, Frenken K, van Oort F (2010) The geography of collaborative knowledge production in Europe. Ann Reg Sci 43:721–738, SpringerCrossRef
Dijkstra BR, Manderson E, Lee T-Y (2011) Extending the sectoral coverage of an international emissions trading scheme. J Environ Resour Econ 50:243–266, SpringerCrossRef
Karlsson C, Manduchi A (2001) Knowledge spillovers in a spatial context – a critical review and assessment. In: Fisher M, Frölich M (eds) Knowledge complexity and innovation systems. Springer, Berlin/New York
Bottazzi L, Peri G (1999) Innovation, demand and knowledge spillovers: theory and evidence from European regions, Working Papers 153, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University
Bottazzi L, Peri G (2005) The international dynamics of R&D and innovation in the short and in the long run, vol 11524, NBER Working Papers. National Bureau of Economic Research, CambridgeCrossRef
Giuliani E (2007) The selective nature of knowledge networks in clusters: evidence from the wine industry. J Econ Geogr 7:139–168, Oxford JournalsCrossRef
Morrison A, Rabellotti R (2009) Knowledge and information networks in an Italian wine cluster. Taylor&Francis: Eur Plann Stud 17(7):983–1006CrossRef
Ostergaard CR (2008) Knowledge flows through social networks in a cluster: comparing University and industry links. In: Proceedings of the 5th international EMAEE conference, Metropolitan University, Manchester. www.​cjournal.​cz/​files/​56.​pdf
Brockhoff K, Gupta A, Rotering C (1991) Inter-firm R&D cooperations in Germany. Technovation J 11(4):219–229, ElsevierCrossRef
Brockhoff K, Teichert T (1995) Cooperative R&D and partners` measures of success. Int J Technol Manag 10(1):111–123, Special Issue on the Management of Technological Flows Across Industrial Boundaries
Lane PJ, Lubatkin M (1998) Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strateg Manag J 19:461–477, Wiley-BlackwellCrossRef
Nooteboom B (2000) Learning and innovation in organizations and economies. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Baum JAC, Silverman BS (1998) Alliances, patents and competitive dynamics in Canadian biotechnology. Adm Sci Assoc Canada, Adm Sci Q 19(6):61–70
Kneller R (1999) University-industry cooperaiton in biomedical R&D in Japan and the United States: implications for biomedical industries. In: Branscomb L et al (eds) Industrializing knowledge: university-industry linkage in Japan and the United States. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Kneller R (2001) Technology transfer: a review for biomedical researchers. Clin Cancer Res J 7:761–774
Thumm N (2004) Strategic patenting in biotechnology. J Technol Anal Strateg Manag 16(4):529–538CrossRef
Arora A, Merges R (2004) Specialized supply firms, property rights and firm boundaries. J Ind Corp Change 13(3):451–475CrossRef
Gambardella A (2005) Patents and the division of innovative labor, In: Arora A, Merges R. Specialized supply firms, property rights, and firm boundaries, J Ind Corp Change 14(6):1223–12233
Paul D (1994) Toward a new economics of science. Res Policy J 23(5):487–522, ElsevierCrossRef
Shane S (2005) The effects of patent litigation on university licensing efforts. NBER Reporter (2)
Sargossi S, de la Potterie B v P (2003) What patent data reveal about universities: the case of Belgium. J Technol Transfer 28:47–51CrossRef
Shulman S (1999) Owning the future. Houghton Mifflin, Boston
Walsh JP, Arora A, Cohen WM (2003) The patenting and licensing of research tools and biomedical innovation. In: Cohen WM, Merrill S (eds) Patents in the knowledge-based economy. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, pp 285–340
Murray F, Stern S (2007) When ideas are not free: the impact of patents on scientific research. In: Jaffe AB, Lerner J, Stern S (eds) Innovation policy and the economy, vol 7. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 33–69
Hagedoorn J (2002) Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. J Res Policy 31:477–492, ElsevierCrossRef
Van Everdingen Y, Waarts E (2003) The effect of national culture on the adoption of innovations. J Mark Lett 14(3):217–232, SpringerCrossRef
Dasgupta P, David P (1994) Toward a new economics of science. J Res Policy 23(5):487–522, ElsevierCrossRef
Geuna A, Nesta LJJ (2006) University patenting and its effects on academic research: the emerging European evidence. J Res Policy 35:790–807, ElsevierCrossRef
Blumenthal D, Campbell EG, Anderson MS, Causino N, Louis KS (1997) Withholding research results in academic life science: evidence from a national survey of faculty. JAMA 277:1224–1228CrossRef
Blumenthal D, Campbell EG, Gokhale M, Yucel R, Clarridge B, Hilgartner S, Holtzman NA (2006) Data withholding in genetics and other life sciences: prevalences and practices. J Acad Med 81(2):137–145CrossRef
Campbell J, Hlavka DL, Welton EJ, Flynn CJ, Turner DD, Spinhirne JD, Scott VS, Hwang IH (2002) Full-time, eye-safe cloud and aerosol lidar observation at atmospheric radiation measurement program sites: instruments and data processing. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 19:431–442CrossRef
Walsh JP, Cohenb WM, Cho C (2007) Where excludability matters: material versus intellectual property in academic biomedical research. J Res Policy 36:1184–1203, ElsevierCrossRef
Davis L, Larsen MT, Lotz P (2011) Scientists’ perspectives concerning the effects of university patenting on the conduct of academic research in the life sciences. J Technol Transfer 36(1):14–37CrossRef
Agrawal A, Henderson R (2002) Putting patents in context: exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. J Manag Sci 48(1):44–60, INFORMSCrossRef
Van Looy B, Callaert J, Debackere K (2006) Scientific and entreprenurial activities within academia: mutually reinforcing, hampering or just co-existing? J Res Policy 34(3):321–342, Elsevier
Fabrizio KR, Di Minin A (2008) Commercializing the laboratory: faculty patenting and the open science environment. J Res Policy 37(5):914–931, ElsevierCrossRef
Maggioni MA, Uberti TE (2007) International networks of knowledge flows: an econometric analysis. In: Frenken K (ed) Applied evolutionary economics and economic geography. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK
Scherngell T, Barber MJ (2009) Spatial interaction modelling of cross-region R&D collaborations. Empirical evidence from the 5th EU framework programme. Pap Reg Sci 88:531–546, SpringerCrossRef
Scherngell T, Barber M (2010) Distinct spatial characteristics of industrial and public research collaborations: evidence from the 5th EU framework programme. Ann Reg Sci 46:247–266CrossRef
Autant-Bernard C, Billand P, Frachisse P, Massard N (2007b) Social distance versus spatial distance in R&D cooperation: empirical evidence from European collaboration choices in micro and nanotechnologies. Pap Reg Sci 86:495–519, SpringerCrossRef
Constantelou A, Tsakanikas A, Caloghirou Y (2004) Inter-country technological linkages in European framework programmes: a spur to European integration? Int J Technol Manag 27:773–790CrossRef
Protogerou A, Caloghirou Y, Lioukas S (2011) Dynamic capabilities and their indirect impact on firm performance. J Ind Corp Change, 1–33
Ortega JL, Aguillo IF (2010) Shaping the European research collaboration in the 6th framework programme health thematic area through network analysis. J Scientometrics 85:377–386CrossRef
Lesage V, Gosselin JF, Hammill MO, Kingsley MCS, Lawson JW (2007) Ecologically and Biologically Significant Areas (EBSAs) in the Estuary and Gulf of St. Lawrence - A marine mammal perspective. Research Document. Can Sci Adv Sec 2007/046:1–94
Scherngell T, Lata R (2011) The geographical dynamics of R&D networks in Europe: a regional perspective using framework programme data. Paper presented at the 2011 EAEPE congress, Vienna, 27–29 Oct 2011
Kruckenberg L, Brandes A, Ahrweiler P (2008) R&D governance rules of the EU framework programmes: the EURuleD archive. NEMO (Supported by the EU FP6-NEST-Adventure Programme Contract n° 028875) Working Paper 6
Jenelius E (2010) User inequity implications of road network vulnerability, Royal Institute of Technology. J Transport Land Use 2(3/4):57–73
Beckmann M (2000) Interurban Knowldhe Networks. In: Batten D et al (eds) Learning, innovation and the urban evolution. Kluwer Academic, London
Johansson B, Klaesson J, Olsson M (2002) Time distances and labor market integration. Pap Reg Sci 81:305–327, SpringerCrossRef
Johansson B, Klaesson J (2001) Monopolistic competition, increasing returns, agglomeration, and transport costs. Ann Reg Sci 35(3):375–394, SpringerCrossRef
Zucker LG, Darby MR (1995) Present at the revolution: transformation of technical identity for a large incumbent pharmaceutical firm after the biotechnological breakthrough, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 5243, August
Broekel T, Boschma R (2010) Knowledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry: the proximity paradox. J Econ Geogr, Res Policy 38:746–755
Draganinska S, Wink R (2005) Interregional and international knowledge flows in medium technology sectors: the role of formal and informal institutions. Paper presented at the 45th ERSA Congress, Amsterdam, August 2005
Cooke P, Ehret O (2009) Proximity and procurement: a study of agglomeration in the Welsh aerospace industry. J Eur Plann Stud 17(4):549–567CrossRef
Tödtling F, Trippl M (2005) One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Res Policy 34:1023–1209CrossRef
Van Egeraat C, Curran D (2010) Defining and valuing the creative industries. Dublin City Council, Dublin
Häussler C, Zademach HM (2006) Cluster performance reconsidered: structure, linkages and paths in the German biotechnology industry, 1996–2003. Discussion paper series of SFB/TR 15 governance and the efficiency of economic systems, Free University of Berlin
Bertolotti M (2005) The history of the laser. Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol
Bromberg J (1991) The laser in America, 1950–1970. MIT Press, Cambridge
Grupp H (2000) Learning in a science-driven market: the case of lasers. Ind Corp Change 9:143–172CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The Role of Intra-, Inter-, and Extra-Regional Sources of Knowledge Spillovers. The Evidence of High-Tech Industries
verfasst von
Małgorzata Runiewicz-Wardyn
Copyright-Jahr
2013
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Buch
Knowledge Flows, Technological Change and Regional Growth in the European Union

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00341-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-00342-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2013

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00342-9_4