Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Discovering and Navigating a Collection of Process Models Using Multiple Quality Dimensions Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2014 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Evaluating KIPN for Modeling KIP

verfasst von : Joanne Manhães Netto, Flávia Maria Santoro, Fernanda Araujo Baião

Erschienen in: Business Process Management Workshops

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Modeling Knowledge-Intensive Processes (KIP) is not an easy task due to its essential characteristics: unstructured, based on social interactions, experience and intentions of the actors involved. The previously developed Knowledge Intensive Process Ontology (KIPO) proposed all the concepts (and relationships among them) to make a KIP explicit. However, KIPO does not provide a graphical notation, which is crucial for the stakeholders to reach a common understanding about it. This paper presents the Knowledge Intensive Process Notation (KIPN), a notation for building knowledge-intensive processes graphical models. We discuss the results of an exploratory study where a KIP was modeled by its participants. The goal was to explore the use of the notation as a basis for identifying the elements within the process modeling.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel A Navigation Metaphor to Support Mobile Workflow Systems
Literatur
1.
Abecker, A.: DECOR Consortium: DECOR – Delivery of context-sensitive organizational knowledge. E-Work and E-Commerce. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2001)
2.
Aalst, W.M.P., Weske, M., Grünbauer, D.: Case handling: a new paradigm for business process support. Data Knowl. Eng. 53(2), 129–162 (2005)CrossRef
3.
Businska, L., Kirikova, M.: Knowledge dimension in business process modeling. In: Nurcan, S. (ed.) CAiSE Forum 2011. LNBIP, vol. 107, pp. 186–201. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
4.
Buzan, T.: The Mind Map Book, 2nd edn. BBC Books, London (1995)
5.
Cardoso, E.C.S., Santos Jr., P.S., Almeida, J.P.A., Guizzardi, R.S.S., Guizzardi, G.: Semantic integration of goal and business process modeling. In: International Conference on Research and Practical Issues of Enterprise Information Systems, Brasil (2010)
6.
Di Ciccio, C., Mecella, M., Catarci, T.: Representing and visualizing mined artful processes in MailOfMine. In: Holzinger, A., Simonic, K.-M. (eds.) USAB 2011. LNCS, vol. 7058, pp. 83–94. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
7.
Di Ciccio, C., Marrella, A., Russo, A.: Knowledge-intensive processes: an overview of contemporary approaches. In: International workshop on Knowledge-intense Business Processes, Italy, pp. 32–47 (2012)
8.
Easterbrook, S.M., Singer, J., Storey, M., Damian, D.: Selecting empirical methods for software engineering research. In: Shull, F., Singer, J. (eds.) Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering. Springer, London (2007)
9.
Eppler, M.J., Seifried, P.M., Ropnack, A.: Improving knowledge intensive processes through an enterprise knowledge medium. In: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Personnel Research, USA, pp. 222–230 (1999)
10.
Eriksson, H.-E., Penker, M.: Business Modeling with UML: Business Patterns at Work. E.U.A. Wiley, Somerset (2000)
11.
França, J.B.S., Santoro, F.M., Baião, F.A.: Towards characterizing knowledge intensive processes. In: International Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work in Design, China , vol. 113, pp. 497–504 (2012a)
12.
dos França, J.B.S., Netto, J., Carvalho, J.E.S., Santoro, F., Baião, F.A., Pimentel, M.: An exploratory study on collaboratively conceptualizing knowledge intensive processes. In: Bider, I., Halpin, T., Krogstie, J., Nurcan, S., Proper, E., Schmidt, R., Soffer, P., Wrycza, S. (eds.) EMMSAD 2012 and BPMDS 2012. LNBIP, vol. 113, pp. 46–60. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
13.
dos França, J.B.S., Netto, J., Barradas, R.G., Santoro, F., Baião, F.A.: Towards knowledge-intensive processes representation. In: La Rosa, M., Soffer, P. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2012. LNBIP, vol. 132, pp. 126–136. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
14.
Gronau, N., Muller, C., Korf, R.: KMDL - capturing, analyzing and improving knowledge intensive business process. J. Univ. Comput. Sci. 11(4), 452–472 (2005)
15.
Hildebrandt, T.T., Mukkamala, R.R.: Declarative event-based workflow as distributed dynamic condition response graphs. In: Programming Languages Approaches to Concurrency and Communication-cEntric Software, Cyprus, pp. 59–73 (2010)
16.
Hill, C., Yates, R., Jones, C., Kogan, S.L.: Beyond predictable workflows: enhancing productivity in artful business processes. IBM Syst. J. 45(4), 663–682 (2006)CrossRef
17.
Korherr, B., List, B.: A UML 2 profile for event driven process chains. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Research and Practical Issues of Enterprise Information Systems, Springer (2006)
18.
19.
Man, H.: Case management: a review of modeling approaches. In: BPTrends, January 2009
20.
Moody, D.: The physics of notations: toward a scientific basis for constructing visual notations in software engineering. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 35(6), 756–779 (2009)CrossRef
21.
Netto, J.M.; França, J.B.S.; Santoro, F.M.; Baião, F.A.: A notation for knowledge-intensive processes. In: 17th IEEE International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, Canada , pp. 190–195 (2013)
22.
Oliveira, A.P.A.: Intentional requirements engineering: a method of elicitation, modeling and analysis of requirements. D.Sc. Thesis, PUC, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (2008) (In Portuguese)
23.
Oliveira, F.F.: A collaboration ontology and its applications. M.Sc. Dissertation. Federal University of Espírito Santo, Brazil (2009) (In Portuguese)
24.
25.
Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: BDI agents: from theory to practice. In: First International Conference on Multiagent Systems, USA, pp. 312–319 (1995)
26.
Schreiber, G., Akkermans, H., Anjewierden, A., Hoog, R., Shadbolt, N., De Velde, W.V., Wielinga, B.: Knowledge Engineering and Management: The CommonKADS Methedology. MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)
27.
Supulniece, I., Businska, L., Kirikova, M.: Towards extending BPMN with the knowledge dimension. In: Bider, I., Halpin, T., Krogstie, J., Nurcan, S., Proper, E., Schmidt, R., Ukor, R. (eds.) BPMDS 2010 and EMMSAD 2010. LNBIP, vol. 50, pp. 69–81. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
28.
Wang, J., Kumar, A.: A Framework for Document-Driven Workflow Systems. In: van der Aalst, W.M., Benatallah, B., Casati, F., Curbera, F. (eds.) BPM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3649, pp. 285–301. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
29.
Yu, E.: Towards modelling and reasoning support for early-phase requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, USA, pp. 226–235 (1997)
30.
Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks (2003)
Metadaten
Titel
Evaluating KIPN for Modeling KIP
verfasst von
Joanne Manhães Netto
Flávia Maria Santoro
Fernanda Araujo Baião
Copyright-Jahr
2014
Buch
Business Process Management Workshops

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06256-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-06257-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2014

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06257-0_44