Skip to main content

A Method of Process Similarity Measure Based on Task Clustering Abstraction

  • Conference paper
Asia Pacific Business Process Management (AP-BPM 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 181))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A variety of methods have been proposed to measure the similarity of process models. But most of the methods only consider the structure while ignoring the semantic feature of the process model. When dealing with the process models with similar semantics but different in structure, these methods fail to achieve due similarity value. In this paper, a novel process model abstraction method is proposed which can keep the semantics as well as the structure features of the process model during abstraction. The output can then be used in the similarity measure. The experiment shows that this method can significantly improve the similarity value and make it closer to actual conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dijkman, R., Dumas, M., van Dongen, B., et al.: Similarity of business process models: Metrics and evaluation. Information Systems 36(2SI), 498–516 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Levenshtein, V.I.: Binary Codes Capable of Correcting Deletions, Insertions and Reversals (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ehrig, M., Koschmider, A., Oberweis, A.: Measuring similarity between semantic business process models. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Asia-Pacific Conference on Comceptual Modelling, vol. 67, pp. 71–80. Australian Computer Society, Inc. (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Miller, G.A.: WordNet: A lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM 38(11), 39–41 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yan, Z., Dijkman, R., Grefen, P.: Fast Business Process Similarity Search with Feature-Based Similarity Estimation. In: Meersman, R., Dillon, T.S., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6426, pp. 60–77. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Dijkman, R., Dumas, M., García-Bañuelos, L.: Graph Matching Algorithms for Business Process Model Similarity Search. In: Dayal, U., Eder, J., Koehler, J., Reijers, H.A. (eds.) BPM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5701, pp. 48–63. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Bae, J., Caverlee, J., Liu, L., Yan, H.: Process Mining by Measuring Process Block Similarity. In: Eder, J., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2006. LNCS, vol. 4103, pp. 141–152. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Fernández, M.-L., Valiente, G.: A graph distance metric combining maximum common subgraph and minimum common supergraph. Pattern Recognition Letters 22(6-7), 753–758 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Bunke, H., Shearer, K.: A graph distance metric based on the maximal common subgraph. Pattern Recognition Letters 19(3-4), 255–259 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kunze, M., Weidlich, M., Weske, M.: Behavioral similarity: A proper metric. In: Rinderle-Ma, S., Toumani, F., Wolf, K. (eds.) BPM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6896, pp. 166–181. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. van Dongen, B.F., Dijkman, R., Mendling, J.: Measuring Similarity between Business Process Models. In: Bellahsène, Z., Léonard, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5074, pp. 450–464. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Gerke, K., Cardoso, J., Claus, A.: Measuring the Compliance of Processes with Reference Models. In: Meersman, R., Dillon, T., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM 2009, Part I. LNCS, vol. 5870, pp. 76–93. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Jung, J.-Y., Bae, J.: Workflow Clustering Method Based on Process Similarity. In: Gavrilova, M.L., Gervasi, O., Kumar, V., Tan, C.J.K., Taniar, D., Laganá, A., Mun, Y., Choo, H. (eds.) ICCSA 2006. LNCS, vol. 3981, pp. 379–389. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, S., Wen, L., Wei, D., Wang, J.: SSDT matrix-based behavioral similarity algorithm for process models. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems 19(8), 1822–1831 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yuan, C.: The Principle and Application of Petri Net. Publishing House of Electronics Industry (2005) (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Smirnov, S., Reijers, H.A., Weske, M.: A semantic approach for business process model abstraction. In: Mouratidis, H., Rolland, C. (eds.) CAiSE 2011. LNCS, vol. 6741, pp. 497–511. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Porter, M.F.: An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program: Electronic library and information systems 14(3), 130–137 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chen, J., Yan, Y., Liu, X., Yu, Y. (2014). A Method of Process Similarity Measure Based on Task Clustering Abstraction. In: Ouyang, C., Jung, JY. (eds) Asia Pacific Business Process Management. AP-BPM 2014. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 181. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08222-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08222-6_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08221-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08222-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics