Skip to main content

Understanding Chaos and Complexity in Education Systems Through Conceptualization of Fractal Properties

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Chaos, Complexity and Leadership 2013

Abstract

Education is a trans-phenomenal, trans-disciplinary, and inter-discursive enterprise. Research into education necessarily reflects this. Educational theorists are making increasing use of the metaphors and concepts of complexity thinking in their discourses. This is normally done in company of exploration of chaotic tendencies in education systems. In this paper we discuss the elements of complexity that engulf educational systems today and highlight some cases of chaos in the education system as well. In doing so we also dissect the properties of fractals which obtain in chaos and complexity theory and how they relate with the features of education systems. We conclude by arguing that if the managers and stakeholders in education are fully abreast with properties of fractals, they would find education systems quite manageable since the properties would inform their operations through understanding the nature, steps and implications of various scenarios in the education system. Thus knowledge of fractal properties becomes a sine-qua-non for educational management and understanding of education systems. We hope the study is a ground breaking one and there is no gain saying that it will contribute massively to the growing body of elusive knowledge that is fractals and how they can help educationists transform the education systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander G (2011) Dealing with the complexities of integration in cultural diverse rural school communities in South Africa. Online J New Horiz Educ 1:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnhardt R, Kawagley O (2003) Culture, chaos & complexity—catalysts for change in indigenous education. CSQ issue: 27.4 indigenous education and the prospects for cultural survival

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois E (2002) Developing foresight for the development of higher education/research relations in the perspective of the European Research Area (ERA). The European Commission Publication

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns T, Wilkoszewski H (2011) Governing complex education systems. Project Plan 2013–2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahill K (2010) Even in chaos: education in times of emergency. Fordham University Press, NewYork

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnall C (2003) Managing change in organizations, Pearson education limited. Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark CM, Floden RE (1988) Preparing teachers for uncertainty. Teachers College Record, Summer 1988

    Google Scholar 

  • Claypole M (2011) The fractal approach to teaching english as a foreign language. Guardian Weekly, Tuesday 5 July 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloete F (2004) A brief note on quantum theory. In: Cloete F (ed) Contemporary trends in public policy analysis. Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, pp 1–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Credaro A (2006) Innovation and change in education. http://www.warriorlibrarian.com/LIBRARY/innovate.html. Accessed 28 Dec 2013

  • Cunningham R (2000) Chaos, complexity and the study of education communities. Institute of Education

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean J (2000) Improving children’s learning: effective teaching in the primary school. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Erçetin ŞŞ, Potas N, Kısa N, Açıkalın ŞN (2013) To be on the edge of chaos with organizational intelligence and health. In: Banerjee S (ed) Chaos and complexity theory for management: nonlinear dynamics. IGI Global, USA, pp 184–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Erçetin ŞŞ (2001) Yönetimde yeni yaklaşımlar. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer KW, Immordino-Yang MA (2002) Cognitive development and education: from dynamic general structure to specific learning and teaching (essay for the Spencer Foundation). Harvard Graduate School of Education, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryer P, Ruis J (2004) What are fractal systems? a brief description of complex adaptive and emergent systems (CAES) http://www.fractal.org/Bewustzijns-Besturings-Model/Fractal-systems.htm. Accessed 28 Dec 2013

  • Garmston R, Wellman B (1995) Adaptive schools in a quantum universe. Educ Leadersh 52(7):6–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgeta I, Castro D (2012) Governance in Spanish universities: changing paradigms. J Hispanic High Educ 11:336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleick J (1987) Chaos: making a new science. Penguin Books, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Glickman, Carl D (2001) Supervision and instructional leadership. Bacon, Allyn

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald GA (2001) Roadmap for managers in the 21st century, Warner Books Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Herghiligiu IV et al (2013) A new conceptual framework for environmental decision based on fractal philosophy. Environ Eng Manage J 12(5):1095–1102

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman J (2010) What we can learn from the first digital generation: Implications for developing twenty-first century learning and thinking skills in the primary grades. Education 3–13; 38(1):47–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper T, Ovens A, Burtler J (2013) Complexity thinking in public education: Reforming curriculum pedagogy and research. Routledge Publishers, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Iancu D, et al (2012) Educational management, a new paradigm in social development. International conference of scientific paper: Afases. Brasov, 24–26 May 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson PW (1986) The practice of teaching. Teachers College Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamali D (2004) Changing management paradigms: implications for educational institutions. Suliman S. Olayan School of Business, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon

    Google Scholar 

  • Kara A (2008) Understanding today’s schools with chaos theory. http://www.fountainmagazine.com/Issue/detail/Understanding-Todays-Schools-with-Chaos-Theory. Accessed 28 Dec 2013

  • Klein M, Rossler E (1998) Toward a better understanding of fractality in nature. In: Pickover CA (ed) Chaos and fractals: a computer graphical journey. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluge T (2000) Fractals in nature and applications. http://kluge.in-chemnitz.de/documents/fractal/node2.html. Accessed 28 Dec 2013

  • Lemke J L, Sabelli N (2002) Complex systems and educational change: towards a new research agenda. University of Michigan. http://www.jaylemke.com. Accessed 28 Dec 2013

  • Lortie DC (1975) Schoolteacher: A sociological study. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Mennin S (2010) Complexity and health professions education: a basic glossary. J Eval Clin Pract 16, 4:838–840

    Google Scholar 

  • McManus M (1993) Discipline in students exclude from school. In: Varma V (ed) Management of behaviour in schools. Longman, London, pp 218–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Mrówka R, Mikołaj P (2011) Dispersion of leadership in global organizations applying new types of organizational structures. Intellect Econ 5(3):477–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanavati M, McCulloch B (2003) School culture and the changing role of the secondary vice principal. Research Report Prepared for the Ontario Principals’ Council

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell C (2008) The class as a learning entity (complex adaptive system): An idea from complexity science and educational research SFU Educational Review, 2, 1:5-17

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonakaa I et al (2013) Dynamic fractal organizations for promoting knowledge-based transformation—A new paradigm for organizational theory. Eur Manage J 33:1875–1883

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2013) Governing complex education systems agenda third thematic conference effective multilevel governance in education. UNESCO Headquarters, 7 Place de Fontenoy, 75007 Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Peurach D (2011) Seeing complexity in public education: problems, possibilities and success for all. Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickover CA (1998) The crying of fractal batrachion. In: Pickover CA (ed) Chaos and fractals: a computer graphical journey. Elsevier Science B.V., Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich PR (2000) Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. J Educ Psychol 92:544–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Praught H (2004) An overview of complexity science and its relevance to the health care sector In: Cloete F (ed) Contemporary trends in public policy analysis. Stellenbosch University Stellenbosch, pp. 433–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Raye J (2012) Fractal organization theory. Petaluma, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstein MT, Collins JJ (1998) Visualizing the effects of filtering chaotic signals. In: Pickover CA (ed) Chaos and fractals: a computer graphical journey. Elsevier Science B.V., Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandkuhl K, Kirikova M (2011) Analysing enterprise models from a fractal organisation perspective—potentials and limitations. In: Johannesson P, Krogstie J, Opdahl AL (eds) The practice of enterprise modeling: lecture notes in business information processing 92. Springer, Germany, pp 193–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoön DA. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York,

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder G (1995) A place in space: Ethics, Aesthetics, and Watersheds. Counterpoint Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprott JC (1998) Automatic generation of strange attractors. In: Pickover CA (ed) Chaos and fractals: a computer graphical journey. Elsevier Science B.V., Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Topper B, Lagadec P (2013) Fractal crises—a new path for crisis theory and management. J Contingencies Crisis Manag 21(1):4–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teichler U (2002) ERASMUS in the SOCRATES Programme: Findings of an evaluation study. Lemmens, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Trygestad J (1997) Chaos in the classroom: An application of chaos theory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL, March 24–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan-Zhong L (2005) Fractal administrative organization: New exploration on administrative organizational pattern. Workshop on innovations in governance and public service to achieve a Harmonious Society. Beijing, 7 Dec 2005

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Şefika Şule Erçetin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Erçetin, Ş.Ş., Bisaso, S.M., Saeed, F. (2015). Understanding Chaos and Complexity in Education Systems Through Conceptualization of Fractal Properties. In: Erçetin, Ş., Banerjee, S. (eds) Chaos, Complexity and Leadership 2013. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09710-7_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics