2014 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel
Read, Write and Copy Dependencies for Symbolic Model Checking
verfasst von : Jeroen Meijer, Gijs Kant, Stefan Blom, Jaco van de Pol
Erschienen in: Hardware and Software: Verification and Testing
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.
Wählen Sie Textabschnitte aus um mit Künstlicher Intelligenz passenden Patente zu finden. powered by
Markieren Sie Textabschnitte, um KI-gestützt weitere passende Inhalte zu finden. powered by
This paper aims at improving symbolic model checking for explicit state modeling languages, e.g.,
Promela
,
Dve
and
mCRL
2. The modular
Pins
architecture of
LTSmin
supports a notion of event locality, by merely indicating for each event on which variables it depends. However, one could distinguish four separate dependencies:
read
,
may-write
,
must-write
and
copy
. In this paper, we introduce these notions in a language-independent manner. In particular, models with arrays need to distinguish overwriting and copying of values.
We also adapt the symbolic model checking algorithms to exploit the refined dependency information. We have implemented refined dependency matrices for
Promela
,
Dve
and
mCRL
2, in order to compare our new algorithms to the original version of
LTSmin
. The results show that the amount of successor computations and memory footprint are greatly reduced. Finally, the optimal variable ordering is also affected by the refined dependencies: We determined experimentally that variables with a read dependency should occur at a higher BDD level than variables with a write dependency.